F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The top Ryzen 7 offers strong performance and provides excellent value for upgrading from the 2700X.

The top Ryzen 7 offers strong performance and provides excellent value for upgrading from the 2700X.

The top Ryzen 7 offers strong performance and provides excellent value for upgrading from the 2700X.

N
nathy2402
Member
75
12-14-2018, 02:21 PM
#1
I purchased the Ryzen 7 2700X in July 2019 and am looking for the top upgrade options for that model in 2022, focusing on performance or value for money. Also, I’m interested in finding the most budget-friendly upgrade. No pressure on me to reply—just help if you can. Thanks!
N
nathy2402
12-14-2018, 02:21 PM #1

I purchased the Ryzen 7 2700X in July 2019 and am looking for the top upgrade options for that model in 2022, focusing on performance or value for money. Also, I’m interested in finding the most budget-friendly upgrade. No pressure on me to reply—just help if you can. Thanks!

J
JuliBr0
Senior Member
495
12-16-2018, 01:02 AM
#2
R5 5600X offers strong performance without extra cores if you need more power for the price. It delivers 6 cores and 12 threads, outperforming the 2700X in multi-core scenarios. On a single core, it remains ahead.
J
JuliBr0
12-16-2018, 01:02 AM #2

R5 5600X offers strong performance without extra cores if you need more power for the price. It delivers 6 cores and 12 threads, outperforming the 2700X in multi-core scenarios. On a single core, it remains ahead.

E
Eusebio06
Senior Member
595
12-17-2018, 10:30 AM
#3
r7 5800x3d ideal for gaming; r7 5700 offers better value for money, while the 5k5600 provides extra savings.
E
Eusebio06
12-17-2018, 10:30 AM #3

r7 5800x3d ideal for gaming; r7 5700 offers better value for money, while the 5k5600 provides extra savings.

D
DavinchiisHD
Junior Member
12
12-18-2018, 11:35 PM
#4
I’d adjust the settings to just 5600 or 5800X3D. This fits your needs and budget well. The 5600 offers solid performance, while the 5800X3D extends your AM4 capabilities until your next upgrade.
D
DavinchiisHD
12-18-2018, 11:35 PM #4

I’d adjust the settings to just 5600 or 5800X3D. This fits your needs and budget well. The 5600 offers solid performance, while the 5800X3D extends your AM4 capabilities until your next upgrade.

F
FlorProPvP
Member
115
12-20-2018, 05:08 PM
#5
It's a bit unclear what you're aiming for here. The top upgrade to your 2700X is likely a Ryzen 5 5600 or 5600X, as they offer similar performance at a lower cost. The strongest Ryzen 7 option is the 5800X (for gaming and work), or the newer 5800X3D (better for games but less so for productivity). There are also higher-end Ryzen models available. It seems you're thinking you need a Ryzen 7 to see any benefit, which isn't true. You probably fit the ideal profile for the 5800X3D—someone with a 3000-series or older chip wanting the best gaming upgrade without changing platforms. At around $450, it might still be beyond your budget.
F
FlorProPvP
12-20-2018, 05:08 PM #5

It's a bit unclear what you're aiming for here. The top upgrade to your 2700X is likely a Ryzen 5 5600 or 5600X, as they offer similar performance at a lower cost. The strongest Ryzen 7 option is the 5800X (for gaming and work), or the newer 5800X3D (better for games but less so for productivity). There are also higher-end Ryzen models available. It seems you're thinking you need a Ryzen 7 to see any benefit, which isn't true. You probably fit the ideal profile for the 5800X3D—someone with a 3000-series or older chip wanting the best gaming upgrade without changing platforms. At around $450, it might still be beyond your budget.

C
CraftingCobus
Junior Member
9
12-28-2018, 10:35 AM
#6
I’ll end up on that hill where the 5800x3d feels like a waste of money at $450, while the 5900x is now around $380 on sites like Newegg or Amazon and works much better in most areas except gaming. Who really sticks to games on their PC? It’s not true that the 5900x is only for gamers either. In my opinion, the two Ryzen models that stand out are the 5600 and the 5900x. The 5700x, 5800x, and 5800x3d are way overpriced compared to their value versus the 5600. The 5600 is fine unless it matches the price of the 5600, otherwise it’s not worth the investment.
C
CraftingCobus
12-28-2018, 10:35 AM #6

I’ll end up on that hill where the 5800x3d feels like a waste of money at $450, while the 5900x is now around $380 on sites like Newegg or Amazon and works much better in most areas except gaming. Who really sticks to games on their PC? It’s not true that the 5900x is only for gamers either. In my opinion, the two Ryzen models that stand out are the 5600 and the 5900x. The 5700x, 5800x, and 5800x3d are way overpriced compared to their value versus the 5600. The 5600 is fine unless it matches the price of the 5600, otherwise it’s not worth the investment.

S
snuttisnutti
Member
206
12-28-2018, 12:05 PM
#7
I believe most folks concentrate on gaming and the rest will still work adequately enough. Like with most matters, returns on investment decline as spending increases relative to benefits. The pricing on the 5800X3D isn’t that poor compared to the i9-12900KS. You also receive additional value beyond a standard factory build. As for other activities outside gaming…that largely depends on the individual. For me, all current CPUs are significantly faster than what I need for non-gaming work, making the 5800X3D worthwhile. Still, I’m holding off on upgrading. The 10900KF still performed well.
S
snuttisnutti
12-28-2018, 12:05 PM #7

I believe most folks concentrate on gaming and the rest will still work adequately enough. Like with most matters, returns on investment decline as spending increases relative to benefits. The pricing on the 5800X3D isn’t that poor compared to the i9-12900KS. You also receive additional value beyond a standard factory build. As for other activities outside gaming…that largely depends on the individual. For me, all current CPUs are significantly faster than what I need for non-gaming work, making the 5800X3D worthwhile. Still, I’m holding off on upgrading. The 10900KF still performed well.

H
Hecchicero
Member
171
12-29-2018, 02:17 PM
#8
I'm not sure what everyone thinks, but keeping lots of Chrome windows open and using Spotify while you play doesn't really mean you're multitasking. The real tasks like rendering and editing are usually measured in CPU tests that suggest some CPUs are better for non-gaming work. Most folks end up buying things they think will help them stream later, but it's not a proven strategy.
H
Hecchicero
12-29-2018, 02:17 PM #8

I'm not sure what everyone thinks, but keeping lots of Chrome windows open and using Spotify while you play doesn't really mean you're multitasking. The real tasks like rendering and editing are usually measured in CPU tests that suggest some CPUs are better for non-gaming work. Most folks end up buying things they think will help them stream later, but it's not a proven strategy.

A
ADIR_4444
Senior Member
417
12-29-2018, 04:12 PM
#9
Did you notice a pattern in past builds where graphics cards were consistently the most costly part? I remember a CPU around $350, a video card between $180 and $250, and a MOBO costing $75 to $125. RAM was very affordable, so people maximized it. This seems to align with the years 1996 to 2002—am I right or is this an early sign of something? Thanks!
A
ADIR_4444
12-29-2018, 04:12 PM #9

Did you notice a pattern in past builds where graphics cards were consistently the most costly part? I remember a CPU around $350, a video card between $180 and $250, and a MOBO costing $75 to $125. RAM was very affordable, so people maximized it. This seems to align with the years 1996 to 2002—am I right or is this an early sign of something? Thanks!