F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The setup is ready for use.

The setup is ready for use.

The setup is ready for use.

E
EtAlien
Member
172
11-28-2018, 08:17 PM
#1
I adjusted and fine-tuned an original configuration for my 9900KS a few months ago, reaching a consistent performance level on a Gigabyte Z390 Designare. The setup includes: CPU clock ratio 50, ring ratio 46, IPG ratio auto, AVX offset auto, enhanced multicore enhancement disabled, and a CPU score of 1.35. The voltage line is auto Vcore with medium VCCIO calibration at 1.1V system voltage and 3200 Trident Z CL14 XMP profile. Under heavy loads like Cinebench or Blender, the CPU maintains around 1.26 to 1.28V during stress, stays near 80°C in Cinebench R23. I spent time testing until I found a reliable configuration that didn’t crash and performed well. Now I’m looking for a more stable option suited for DAW workflows—like Pro Tools—so it won’t fail unexpectedly due to multicore spikes in creative software. A balanced setup with minimal tweaking, XMP support, and acceptable performance is ideal. The simplest choice so far has been the default BIOS on the motherboard, but that keeps the CPU constantly running at full speed across all cores, which isn’t ideal for stability.
E
EtAlien
11-28-2018, 08:17 PM #1

I adjusted and fine-tuned an original configuration for my 9900KS a few months ago, reaching a consistent performance level on a Gigabyte Z390 Designare. The setup includes: CPU clock ratio 50, ring ratio 46, IPG ratio auto, AVX offset auto, enhanced multicore enhancement disabled, and a CPU score of 1.35. The voltage line is auto Vcore with medium VCCIO calibration at 1.1V system voltage and 3200 Trident Z CL14 XMP profile. Under heavy loads like Cinebench or Blender, the CPU maintains around 1.26 to 1.28V during stress, stays near 80°C in Cinebench R23. I spent time testing until I found a reliable configuration that didn’t crash and performed well. Now I’m looking for a more stable option suited for DAW workflows—like Pro Tools—so it won’t fail unexpectedly due to multicore spikes in creative software. A balanced setup with minimal tweaking, XMP support, and acceptable performance is ideal. The simplest choice so far has been the default BIOS on the motherboard, but that keeps the CPU constantly running at full speed across all cores, which isn’t ideal for stability.

J
JOCKER1709
Member
66
11-29-2018, 03:03 AM
#2
A lot of effort wasted trying to run it at XMP. If you want stability, just use 24-hour prime95 large FFTs. The CPU won’t handle p95 smallest FFTs well—they turn it into a room heater.
J
JOCKER1709
11-29-2018, 03:03 AM #2

A lot of effort wasted trying to run it at XMP. If you want stability, just use 24-hour prime95 large FFTs. The CPU won’t handle p95 smallest FFTs well—they turn it into a room heater.

T
TommyTheLommy
Posting Freak
846
11-30-2018, 06:51 AM
#3
I've tested prime in several environments, adjusting CPU and memory settings (not just the smallest FFT but also not overly relaxed). I've also used aida64 and Blender. Still, stability can be an issue—sometimes you might notice sudden spikes in power usage due to a problematic plugin or hardware quirk that pushes temperatures beyond safe limits. This hasn't happened to me yet, but I recall how delicate the balance was between power and thermal performance. I’d prefer software with automatic power management to avoid random surges that could cause overheating or crashes, without being too hot. And the standard BIOS settings tend to draw more power and generate more heat. PS: Don’t miss out, because you might be missing the chance to get more performance from your quality hardware.
T
TommyTheLommy
11-30-2018, 06:51 AM #3

I've tested prime in several environments, adjusting CPU and memory settings (not just the smallest FFT but also not overly relaxed). I've also used aida64 and Blender. Still, stability can be an issue—sometimes you might notice sudden spikes in power usage due to a problematic plugin or hardware quirk that pushes temperatures beyond safe limits. This hasn't happened to me yet, but I recall how delicate the balance was between power and thermal performance. I’d prefer software with automatic power management to avoid random surges that could cause overheating or crashes, without being too hot. And the standard BIOS settings tend to draw more power and generate more heat. PS: Don’t miss out, because you might be missing the chance to get more performance from your quality hardware.

T
209
12-16-2018, 11:24 PM
#4
Adjust your settings a bit more if you want top performance, but if max speed is too unstable, reduce it slightly to avoid extreme fluctuations. Small temperature changes can cause crashes or errors, so proper cooling is essential. For example, with my 1520 DDR2, I can push it to 1520 on a basic setup, but if the temperature rises too much it starts failing. Lowering to 1470 lets me run at a lower voltage (2.2v instead of 2.38v) and keeps stability without needing multiple fans. I'm still looking for a better RAM controller to see if I can get consistent 1600 DDR2 performance on air, since it's exciting to try overclocking.
T
timidgecko1134
12-16-2018, 11:24 PM #4

Adjust your settings a bit more if you want top performance, but if max speed is too unstable, reduce it slightly to avoid extreme fluctuations. Small temperature changes can cause crashes or errors, so proper cooling is essential. For example, with my 1520 DDR2, I can push it to 1520 on a basic setup, but if the temperature rises too much it starts failing. Lowering to 1470 lets me run at a lower voltage (2.2v instead of 2.38v) and keeps stability without needing multiple fans. I'm still looking for a better RAM controller to see if I can get consistent 1600 DDR2 performance on air, since it's exciting to try overclocking.

C
Chester09
Senior Member
491
12-22-2018, 07:16 AM
#5
I understand, the process of locating the 1.35 V at medium LLC was challenging due to voltage fluctuations—sometimes too low, sometimes too high, causing crashes or overheating. It wasn't perfectly stable even after a crash occurred after two weeks. Regarding your question, are there automatic power settings that maintain performance and stability without manual adjustments?
C
Chester09
12-22-2018, 07:16 AM #5

I understand, the process of locating the 1.35 V at medium LLC was challenging due to voltage fluctuations—sometimes too low, sometimes too high, causing crashes or overheating. It wasn't perfectly stable even after a crash occurred after two weeks. Regarding your question, are there automatic power settings that maintain performance and stability without manual adjustments?

H
Hagnarock
Senior Member
434
12-22-2018, 08:17 AM
#6
Adjust to 4.9 or 4.8ghz provides extra flexibility, helping avoid crashes during sudden temperature changes
H
Hagnarock
12-22-2018, 08:17 AM #6

Adjust to 4.9 or 4.8ghz provides extra flexibility, helping avoid crashes during sudden temperature changes

X
Xerii
Junior Member
10
12-22-2018, 09:06 AM
#7
I suppose I used to do that too and it might be the optimal choice. Could you share your thoughts on areas to enhance my custom OC? I was considering a setup similar to the default motherboard configuration, which lacks an LLC and reduces the frequency with dynamic offset from 5 GHz to 4.9 GHz for lower temperatures. My custom tuning is about 12 degrees cooler, which translates to a Cinebench R23 score of 78 versus 90. Yet I’m puzzled—why does playing Hunt Showdown give me better FPS and steadier performance with my custom tuning? It seems counterintuitive, since in-game temperatures are around 70 degrees compared to a peak of 80°C. I didn’t adjust the c-states in my custom profile either. It feels strange, except I turned off Enhanced Multicore performance. Another point: I believed Enhanced Multicore boosts every core to its maximum frequency (likely around 4.7 GHz on the 9900K), but a tutorial said otherwise: disable these power management settings—Intel Speed Shift, C1E, C3, C6/C7, C8, and C10 support. Or better yet, just turn off Enhanced Multi-Core in Advanced Frequency Settings. Could this be the reason for the stability difference? Since it’s off in my custom profile but not in the standard one? Also, should I modify the system agent and VCCIO, or does the RAM XMP profile already handle this?
X
Xerii
12-22-2018, 09:06 AM #7

I suppose I used to do that too and it might be the optimal choice. Could you share your thoughts on areas to enhance my custom OC? I was considering a setup similar to the default motherboard configuration, which lacks an LLC and reduces the frequency with dynamic offset from 5 GHz to 4.9 GHz for lower temperatures. My custom tuning is about 12 degrees cooler, which translates to a Cinebench R23 score of 78 versus 90. Yet I’m puzzled—why does playing Hunt Showdown give me better FPS and steadier performance with my custom tuning? It seems counterintuitive, since in-game temperatures are around 70 degrees compared to a peak of 80°C. I didn’t adjust the c-states in my custom profile either. It feels strange, except I turned off Enhanced Multicore performance. Another point: I believed Enhanced Multicore boosts every core to its maximum frequency (likely around 4.7 GHz on the 9900K), but a tutorial said otherwise: disable these power management settings—Intel Speed Shift, C1E, C3, C6/C7, C8, and C10 support. Or better yet, just turn off Enhanced Multi-Core in Advanced Frequency Settings. Could this be the reason for the stability difference? Since it’s off in my custom profile but not in the standard one? Also, should I modify the system agent and VCCIO, or does the RAM XMP profile already handle this?

E
Eduardo_GameOn
Posting Freak
921
12-22-2018, 03:46 PM
#8
Perhaps the improved in-game performance and stability come from using my custom OC, which locks the voltage, whereas the standard BIOS auto mode changes it depending on how you use it, causing less consistent results. I’m still puzzled by why disabling Enhanced Multicore Performance also turns off C-States and related features.
E
Eduardo_GameOn
12-22-2018, 03:46 PM #8

Perhaps the improved in-game performance and stability come from using my custom OC, which locks the voltage, whereas the standard BIOS auto mode changes it depending on how you use it, causing less consistent results. I’m still puzzled by why disabling Enhanced Multicore Performance also turns off C-States and related features.

G
Geartator
Member
61
12-28-2018, 04:17 AM
#9
Adjust the frequency to 4.9 or 4.8 for more headroom. For VCCSA/IO, set both to 1.45V and check how much your IMC can handle before the die dies—likely not exceeding 4400, so overheating shouldn't be a big issue. You'll still need a fan over the RAM because die temperature is sensitive, and it supports voltages above 1.5V which may be necessary as voltage scaling improves performance.
G
Geartator
12-28-2018, 04:17 AM #9

Adjust the frequency to 4.9 or 4.8 for more headroom. For VCCSA/IO, set both to 1.45V and check how much your IMC can handle before the die dies—likely not exceeding 4400, so overheating shouldn't be a big issue. You'll still need a fan over the RAM because die temperature is sensitive, and it supports voltages above 1.5V which may be necessary as voltage scaling improves performance.