F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks The new Poco M5s devices cannot link smoothly with the Deco system.

The new Poco M5s devices cannot link smoothly with the Deco system.

The new Poco M5s devices cannot link smoothly with the Deco system.

M
MONSTERmoose91
Senior Member
526
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#1
I received three Deco units, two linked to the ISP via W-Fi (disabled) with a 1GB fiber link, and one connected through Wi-Fi. After installing my new phone, I experienced Wi-Fi instability while moving around the house. The connection lasted as long as possible, then dropped to "no internet" until I returned to the Deco’s location. Reconnecting took time, and sometimes it didn’t establish at all with nearby units. I recalled a similar issue with my old Redmi Note 9S; I checked network settings but couldn’t find a fix. The Poco device had tethering enabled, which I turned off without success. In the Deoc app, both phones were set to "Mesh Technology." I switched both Wi-Fi off and back on in the same area, connecting them to the same Deco on the 5GHz band. Network details showed the Poco received 433Mbps while the old phone got 866Mbps. Both devices appear to share the same hardware for networking. Why would this happen?
M
MONSTERmoose91
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #1

I received three Deco units, two linked to the ISP via W-Fi (disabled) with a 1GB fiber link, and one connected through Wi-Fi. After installing my new phone, I experienced Wi-Fi instability while moving around the house. The connection lasted as long as possible, then dropped to "no internet" until I returned to the Deco’s location. Reconnecting took time, and sometimes it didn’t establish at all with nearby units. I recalled a similar issue with my old Redmi Note 9S; I checked network settings but couldn’t find a fix. The Poco device had tethering enabled, which I turned off without success. In the Deoc app, both phones were set to "Mesh Technology." I switched both Wi-Fi off and back on in the same area, connecting them to the same Deco on the 5GHz band. Network details showed the Poco received 433Mbps while the old phone got 866Mbps. Both devices appear to share the same hardware for networking. Why would this happen?

R
R3kty
Member
133
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#2
The specific Deco model referenced is likely the 2-unit setup linked to the ISP, operating in AP mode.
R
R3kty
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #2

The specific Deco model referenced is likely the 2-unit setup linked to the ISP, operating in AP mode.

S
Sasuke2k
Junior Member
19
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#3
Deco x20 two units are linked to the ISP, and the third uses Wi-Fi. All devices are grouped together in the app using AP mode. It’s unclear if this matters, but I thought it worth noting the configuration. Everything functions properly on the older phone, suggesting the issue relates to Poco.
S
Sasuke2k
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #3

Deco x20 two units are linked to the ISP, and the third uses Wi-Fi. All devices are grouped together in the app using AP mode. It’s unclear if this matters, but I thought it worth noting the configuration. Everything functions properly on the older phone, suggesting the issue relates to Poco.

N
NYAn_Kat_FTW
Junior Member
1
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#4
In reality, they differ. The Redmi Note 9S paired with Snapdragon 720G appears more appealing in theory. When switching between various wireless configurations, it's typically the client device that chooses when to detach from weaker signals and connect to stronger ones. Software tools on the access point can assist, but the client retains most authority. If the client stays on the weaker signal, performance will decline for that user. On contemporary smartphones, managing wireless transitions via the antenna is challenging since it's determined by the manufacturer and governed by the operating system. Previously, users relied on apps, though compatibility with recent Android versions or mesh networks is questionable. The only suggestion I can offer is to enable 'WiFi safe mode' in Developer settings—toggle it to observe any changes during regular use. There’s limited documentation available, so I’m relying on the brief description provided.
N
NYAn_Kat_FTW
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #4

In reality, they differ. The Redmi Note 9S paired with Snapdragon 720G appears more appealing in theory. When switching between various wireless configurations, it's typically the client device that chooses when to detach from weaker signals and connect to stronger ones. Software tools on the access point can assist, but the client retains most authority. If the client stays on the weaker signal, performance will decline for that user. On contemporary smartphones, managing wireless transitions via the antenna is challenging since it's determined by the manufacturer and governed by the operating system. Previously, users relied on apps, though compatibility with recent Android versions or mesh networks is questionable. The only suggestion I can offer is to enable 'WiFi safe mode' in Developer settings—toggle it to observe any changes during regular use. There’s limited documentation available, so I’m relying on the brief description provided.

S
SwarmGiant
Junior Member
11
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#5
From the network perspective, it appears similar functionality exists. Not someone with technical expertise... It might be a 2022 model priced around the same level and from the same manufacturer—parts quality could be lower for networking. The frustrating part is I’m certain this issue also occurred with older devices, which were somehow fixed but now I’m uncertain if it actually happened. I didn’t see "WiFi safe mode" in the developer settings. It seems to be labeled differently. For network configurations, I only have: Wireless display certification – OFF, WiFi verbose logging – OFF, WiFi scan throttling – OFF, WiFi non-persistent MAC re-use – OFF, Always keep mobile data on for quick switching – ON, Tethering hardware acceleration – ON, rest are Bluetooth settings.
S
SwarmGiant
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #5

From the network perspective, it appears similar functionality exists. Not someone with technical expertise... It might be a 2022 model priced around the same level and from the same manufacturer—parts quality could be lower for networking. The frustrating part is I’m certain this issue also occurred with older devices, which were somehow fixed but now I’m uncertain if it actually happened. I didn’t see "WiFi safe mode" in the developer settings. It seems to be labeled differently. For network configurations, I only have: Wireless display certification – OFF, WiFi verbose logging – OFF, WiFi scan throttling – OFF, WiFi non-persistent MAC re-use – OFF, Always keep mobile data on for quick switching – ON, Tethering hardware acceleration – ON, rest are Bluetooth settings.

B
BobDerMaurer
Member
176
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#6
I own three Deco X20 models and haven’t run into problems except with the Chromecast v1, which needs a special configuration. It seems mesh networking was turned off for that unit. In the app, you can decide whether each device uses mesh technology. Within the app, locate the Mac address to identify the faulty device and ensure mesh is activated. If mesh is on, try disabling it temporarily to see if it improves connectivity. Determine which Deco is the primary or master unit—check if it’s directly connected to your ISP router. Look for the second unit that also has a wired connection; verify it displays "Connected to: Main (Ethernet)". Consider using switches in your home; some older models lack support for multicast packets used for device-to-device communication. This guide helps: https://www.tp-link.com/ca/support/faq/1794/ Regarding networking upgrades, yes—some components can be swapped to cut costs, as seen with older iPhones where better reception existed on earlier models.
B
BobDerMaurer
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #6

I own three Deco X20 models and haven’t run into problems except with the Chromecast v1, which needs a special configuration. It seems mesh networking was turned off for that unit. In the app, you can decide whether each device uses mesh technology. Within the app, locate the Mac address to identify the faulty device and ensure mesh is activated. If mesh is on, try disabling it temporarily to see if it improves connectivity. Determine which Deco is the primary or master unit—check if it’s directly connected to your ISP router. Look for the second unit that also has a wired connection; verify it displays "Connected to: Main (Ethernet)". Consider using switches in your home; some older models lack support for multicast packets used for device-to-device communication. This guide helps: https://www.tp-link.com/ca/support/faq/1794/ Regarding networking upgrades, yes—some components can be swapped to cut costs, as seen with older iPhones where better reception existed on earlier models.

K
56
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM
#7
It seems it's the device itself. Everything else is functioning properly. 1) I tried, but it didn't work. 2) Yes, the two connected by wires are the ones I use most and the third via WiFi is farther away and rarely used. I can see the wired icon for the second one, but there are no switches. That's frustrating. I'd prefer a stable connection over a glitchy one. I use two main rooms that are on opposite sides, so it's quite noticeable. I hope something gets resolved. Thanks for the advice.
K
KungFooToaster
05-13-2025, 12:47 PM #7

It seems it's the device itself. Everything else is functioning properly. 1) I tried, but it didn't work. 2) Yes, the two connected by wires are the ones I use most and the third via WiFi is farther away and rarely used. I can see the wired icon for the second one, but there are no switches. That's frustrating. I'd prefer a stable connection over a glitchy one. I use two main rooms that are on opposite sides, so it's quite noticeable. I hope something gets resolved. Thanks for the advice.