F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The most powerful processor designed specifically for Socket 775 motherboards was the Intel Core i9-13900K.

The most powerful processor designed specifically for Socket 775 motherboards was the Intel Core i9-13900K.

The most powerful processor designed specifically for Socket 775 motherboards was the Intel Core i9-13900K.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
Logitech_
Junior Member
19
05-23-2022, 06:59 PM
#1
I still rely on my 2006 machine. It features an Intel Core 2 Duo E2180, which I purchased for around $65,000 INR today. Did these chips deliver strong performance or were they replaced by Core i series?
L
Logitech_
05-23-2022, 06:59 PM #1

I still rely on my 2006 machine. It features an Intel Core 2 Duo E2180, which I purchased for around $65,000 INR today. Did these chips deliver strong performance or were they replaced by Core i series?

2
2Gustav
Member
59
05-24-2022, 01:47 AM
#2
From the buyer's perspective, the Yorkfield Core 2 Quad Extremes would be a good choice. I recall a QX9650 existed, and there were likely even higher models available. They remain quite costly. The most powerful CPUs in a series are still sought after due to limited availability and the need for robust processors on LGA 775 boards. If you're considering an upgrade, the Q9550 seems to be the top option, provided your motherboard can handle it. Early LGA 775 boards lacked support for Core 2 Quads, while later models did but not all supported the latest C2Q CPUs. On the server side, I have no clear information about the top-tier LGA 775 Xeons in terms of performance or core count.
2
2Gustav
05-24-2022, 01:47 AM #2

From the buyer's perspective, the Yorkfield Core 2 Quad Extremes would be a good choice. I recall a QX9650 existed, and there were likely even higher models available. They remain quite costly. The most powerful CPUs in a series are still sought after due to limited availability and the need for robust processors on LGA 775 boards. If you're considering an upgrade, the Q9550 seems to be the top option, provided your motherboard can handle it. Early LGA 775 boards lacked support for Core 2 Quads, while later models did but not all supported the latest C2Q CPUs. On the server side, I have no clear information about the top-tier LGA 775 Xeons in terms of performance or core count.

V
VadorKrazY_PvP
Junior Member
5
05-26-2022, 06:23 AM
#3
I believe it was the QX9650. It featured four cores operating at 3GHz. It was manufactured using the 45nm process, whereas many other LGA 775 chips used the 65nm node. The Xeon X3380 would slightly surpass the QX9650 in performance. It also offered additional advantages like ECC memory support. However, processors significantly more powerful than the E3180 for LGA 775 existed before the Core i series launched, making the LGA 775 quickly outdated.
V
VadorKrazY_PvP
05-26-2022, 06:23 AM #3

I believe it was the QX9650. It featured four cores operating at 3GHz. It was manufactured using the 45nm process, whereas many other LGA 775 chips used the 65nm node. The Xeon X3380 would slightly surpass the QX9650 in performance. It also offered additional advantages like ECC memory support. However, processors significantly more powerful than the E3180 for LGA 775 existed before the Core i series launched, making the LGA 775 quickly outdated.

K
KINGPIE108
Member
53
05-26-2022, 07:18 PM
#4
You might face challenges running this chip on your device as it is provided "As is." It’s important to identify the specific board you’re using and its compatibility. I can verify that numerous boards accommodate both older and newer 775 chips due to high production numbers. Many devices were designed to include space for newer models, but older chip support was removed from BIOS files once they were released. This situation arose from a problem I encountered before resolving it, involving two BIOS chips on the same board—one for older models and another updated with a newer BIOS to enable support.
K
KINGPIE108
05-26-2022, 07:18 PM #4

You might face challenges running this chip on your device as it is provided "As is." It’s important to identify the specific board you’re using and its compatibility. I can verify that numerous boards accommodate both older and newer 775 chips due to high production numbers. Many devices were designed to include space for newer models, but older chip support was removed from BIOS files once they were released. This situation arose from a problem I encountered before resolving it, involving two BIOS chips on the same board—one for older models and another updated with a newer BIOS to enable support.

I
iron_finder1
Posting Freak
750
05-27-2022, 12:14 PM
#5
Q9650 is exactly what you mentioned. All Extreme Editions remain surprisingly costly yet function identically to standard chips when you don’t overclock them. 771 Xeons won’t work on 775 boards unless you modify them, but you can find altered 771 models on AliExpress that fit the 775 sockets.
I
iron_finder1
05-27-2022, 12:14 PM #5

Q9650 is exactly what you mentioned. All Extreme Editions remain surprisingly costly yet function identically to standard chips when you don’t overclock them. 771 Xeons won’t work on 775 boards unless you modify them, but you can find altered 771 models on AliExpress that fit the 775 sockets.

D
doglover4421
Member
112
05-29-2022, 06:34 AM
#6
It seems I missed that those Xeons from back had their own connector. QX9650, though, I still believe a unicorn QX9750 existed.
D
doglover4421
05-29-2022, 06:34 AM #6

It seems I missed that those Xeons from back had their own connector. QX9650, though, I still believe a unicorn QX9750 existed.

C
Codster1239
Junior Member
11
05-29-2022, 08:20 AM
#7
Consider pairing this Intel Core2 Quad QX9650 with an Intel DP45SG board for optimal performance. Adding a NVidia 660 GTX and 8 GB of QVL Listed DDR3 1333 RAM would still leave you struggling with older titles like Diablo III. A configuration like this would be constrained by the CPU and wouldn't handle modern applications well, even though Windows 10 Pro runs smoothly. I’ve learned this the hard way.
C
Codster1239
05-29-2022, 08:20 AM #7

Consider pairing this Intel Core2 Quad QX9650 with an Intel DP45SG board for optimal performance. Adding a NVidia 660 GTX and 8 GB of QVL Listed DDR3 1333 RAM would still leave you struggling with older titles like Diablo III. A configuration like this would be constrained by the CPU and wouldn't handle modern applications well, even though Windows 10 Pro runs smoothly. I’ve learned this the hard way.

K
kilian1902
Member
56
06-01-2022, 11:47 AM
#8
I remember the QX9750 was LGA 771, not LGA 775. If I’m right. Sorry... correction came later. The QX9750 used socket 775, while the Core 2 Quad Extreme model was LGA 771. I checked Wikipedia and found the CPU details. The QX9770 launched MRSP for $1399, but it was extremely rare. The QX9650 was widely available when you could afford it. You also needed a motherboard supporting 1600 MT/s FSB, making the QX9650 at 1333 MT/s a top choice for LGA 775 P45 boards.
K
kilian1902
06-01-2022, 11:47 AM #8

I remember the QX9750 was LGA 771, not LGA 775. If I’m right. Sorry... correction came later. The QX9750 used socket 775, while the Core 2 Quad Extreme model was LGA 771. I checked Wikipedia and found the CPU details. The QX9770 launched MRSP for $1399, but it was extremely rare. The QX9650 was widely available when you could afford it. You also needed a motherboard supporting 1600 MT/s FSB, making the QX9650 at 1333 MT/s a top choice for LGA 775 P45 boards.

T
Thuder2
Member
174
06-01-2022, 12:18 PM
#9
According to Ark, the LGA775 QX9770 was available at 136W for a 3.2Ghz quad-core processor.
T
Thuder2
06-01-2022, 12:18 PM #9

According to Ark, the LGA775 QX9770 was available at 136W for a 3.2Ghz quad-core processor.

M
MrHuchin
Junior Member
13
06-06-2022, 11:37 PM
#10
The front side bus speed was 1600 MT/s, not the advertised 1333 MT/s. The motherboard used a P45 chipset with 1333 FSB. I’m not familiar with any LGA 775 board supporting 1600 FSB. For my Intel DP45SG, the QX9770 was the only option, not the QX9650. I didn’t know any board at that time supported the QX9770. I used a large Zalman heatpipe tower with a 120mm PWM fan to cool the QX9650, but only achieved mild overclocks.
M
MrHuchin
06-06-2022, 11:37 PM #10

The front side bus speed was 1600 MT/s, not the advertised 1333 MT/s. The motherboard used a P45 chipset with 1333 FSB. I’m not familiar with any LGA 775 board supporting 1600 FSB. For my Intel DP45SG, the QX9770 was the only option, not the QX9650. I didn’t know any board at that time supported the QX9770. I used a large Zalman heatpipe tower with a 120mm PWM fan to cool the QX9650, but only achieved mild overclocks.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next