F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The maximum safe core voltage for the i9-10980xe is typically around 1.5 volts.

The maximum safe core voltage for the i9-10980xe is typically around 1.5 volts.

The maximum safe core voltage for the i9-10980xe is typically around 1.5 volts.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
G
goephi
Member
210
08-16-2018, 04:57 PM
#1
Hello! I'm looking for the optimal safe core voltage for the i9-10980xe to run at 5GHz across all 18 cores consistently. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. You're already using two 360 radiators and watercooling the VRM, so that helps a lot.
G
goephi
08-16-2018, 04:57 PM #1

Hello! I'm looking for the optimal safe core voltage for the i9-10980xe to run at 5GHz across all 18 cores consistently. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. You're already using two 360 radiators and watercooling the VRM, so that helps a lot.

T
TrueMM2
Member
227
08-16-2018, 05:14 PM
#2
It’s unlikely this will occur with proper cooling and voltage settings. A static 1.4 should be fine, and I wouldn’t exceed 1.35 with a negative offset. Achieving 5GHz would require even more careful management.
T
TrueMM2
08-16-2018, 05:14 PM #2

It’s unlikely this will occur with proper cooling and voltage settings. A static 1.4 should be fine, and I wouldn’t exceed 1.35 with a negative offset. Achieving 5GHz would require even more careful management.

J
jerppu04
Member
68
08-18-2018, 06:21 AM
#3
What voltage do you suggest for a 4.9GHz frequency?
J
jerppu04
08-18-2018, 06:21 AM #3

What voltage do you suggest for a 4.9GHz frequency?

S
Stealthycat75
Member
74
08-29-2018, 03:18 AM
#4
It's unlikely this will occur. Concerning voltage, the amount needed differs for each chip. You'll need to test it yourself. VRMs generally don't need water cooling unless you're using the cheapest X299 board, as most solid HEDT boards are bulky, but that's up to you. Note: I just realized you're using two 360mm rads—still not a guarantee of reaching 5GHz. In short, aim for under 1.25V to keep temperatures manageable (even with your custom loop). Check out Gamers Nexus' review of the 10980XE; they reported significant overclocking and voltage usage, around 500W. Edited July 1, 2020 by Mateyyy
S
Stealthycat75
08-29-2018, 03:18 AM #4

It's unlikely this will occur. Concerning voltage, the amount needed differs for each chip. You'll need to test it yourself. VRMs generally don't need water cooling unless you're using the cheapest X299 board, as most solid HEDT boards are bulky, but that's up to you. Note: I just realized you're using two 360mm rads—still not a guarantee of reaching 5GHz. In short, aim for under 1.25V to keep temperatures manageable (even with your custom loop). Check out Gamers Nexus' review of the 10980XE; they reported significant overclocking and voltage usage, around 500W. Edited July 1, 2020 by Mateyyy

N
NinjaTurtleNL
Member
207
09-16-2018, 04:37 AM
#5
Test different settings carefully. Each i9-10980XE might respond uniquely, even with identical chips. The performance could vary significantly—some might hit closer to 4.9 GHz while others cap around 4.6 GHz.
N
NinjaTurtleNL
09-16-2018, 04:37 AM #5

Test different settings carefully. Each i9-10980XE might respond uniquely, even with identical chips. The performance could vary significantly—some might hit closer to 4.9 GHz while others cap around 4.6 GHz.

_
___Alex___
Member
109
09-16-2018, 06:52 AM
#6
Right now I'm performing reliably at 4.8ghz with a 1.23V core voltage across all 18 cores @-rascal-
_
___Alex___
09-16-2018, 06:52 AM #6

Right now I'm performing reliably at 4.8ghz with a 1.23V core voltage across all 18 cores @-rascal-

_
_Mi4S_
Junior Member
43
09-16-2018, 10:50 AM
#7
My question is funny but I'll only be ignorant for 5 minutes versus being ignorant forever no question with the intention of learning is a dumb question. thank you all for your help.
_
_Mi4S_
09-16-2018, 10:50 AM #7

My question is funny but I'll only be ignorant for 5 minutes versus being ignorant forever no question with the intention of learning is a dumb question. thank you all for your help.

R
robbierobot99
Member
102
09-16-2018, 05:22 PM
#8
They altered the approach compared to Skylake-X, though not dramatically. If it reaches similar performance levels, it could ease things, but cooling will remain a challenge. The main issue remains overheating the CPU, limiting voltage increases and forcing a compromise between temperature and reliability. Based on my experience with the 7920X using a Noctua D15, I typically hit around 4.5 GHz at about 1.15 volts. Beyond that, thermal limits cause instability. The 10980XE offers some improvements—it's newer and soldered, which helps—but expect limited gains. You might manage a bit further, but thermal constraints will likely set an upper bound before you hit risky voltages. A solid clock, but pushing it further isn't practical.
R
robbierobot99
09-16-2018, 05:22 PM #8

They altered the approach compared to Skylake-X, though not dramatically. If it reaches similar performance levels, it could ease things, but cooling will remain a challenge. The main issue remains overheating the CPU, limiting voltage increases and forcing a compromise between temperature and reliability. Based on my experience with the 7920X using a Noctua D15, I typically hit around 4.5 GHz at about 1.15 volts. Beyond that, thermal limits cause instability. The 10980XE offers some improvements—it's newer and soldered, which helps—but expect limited gains. You might manage a bit further, but thermal constraints will likely set an upper bound before you hit risky voltages. A solid clock, but pushing it further isn't practical.

X
xXIronZombieXx
Junior Member
31
09-18-2018, 03:26 PM
#9
Thank you. The 4.8GHz at 1.23V is perfect for continuous, 24/7 operation. My temperatures remain stable across cores—my hottest core stays around 60°C with Porina.
X
xXIronZombieXx
09-18-2018, 03:26 PM #9

Thank you. The 4.8GHz at 1.23V is perfect for continuous, 24/7 operation. My temperatures remain stable across cores—my hottest core stays around 60°C with Porina.

A
AthenasLight
Posting Freak
781
09-18-2018, 10:22 PM
#10
You're checking which workloads affect stability. It seems some compute tasks might cause issues, but skipping them is fine. You're also open to experimenting with AVX offsets if required.
A
AthenasLight
09-18-2018, 10:22 PM #10

You're checking which workloads affect stability. It seems some compute tasks might cause issues, but skipping them is fine. You're also open to experimenting with AVX offsets if required.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next