The large server backup is experiencing slow transfers due to network issues or insufficient bandwidth.

F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks The large server backup is experiencing slow transfers due to network issues or insufficient bandwidth.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2

Maisiemoo12
Member

154

06-18-2016, 10:27 PM

#11

Here you go again, bruh.

Maisiemoo12

06-18-2016, 10:27 PM #11

Here you go again, bruh.

Mackonaut
Member

145

06-19-2016, 11:58 PM

#12

It’s unclear why zfs to zfs is preferred over zfs send—transfer overhead isn’t the main concern. The status of sync depends on your configuration; it may be enabled or disabled based on settings.

Mackonaut

06-19-2016, 11:58 PM #12

rolcon
Junior Member

06-20-2016, 09:49 AM

#13

Are there numerous tiny files present? This could severely impact your transfer speed no matter which protocol you use.

rolcon

06-20-2016, 09:49 AM #13

Are there numerous tiny files present? This could severely impact your transfer speed no matter which protocol you use.

alonr1
Junior Member

06-20-2016, 09:55 AM

#14

It's true, even when switching between NFS and NFS, performance remains poor when transferring data between SSDs versus SSDs on the same system. I'm looking for ways to enhance it but haven't discovered any solutions yet.

alonr1

06-20-2016, 09:55 AM #14

Sheray
Member

218

06-20-2016, 01:11 PM

#15

Yes, it changes how data is transferred. Using rsync with -z compresses the data during transfer.

Sheray

06-20-2016, 01:11 PM #15

Yes, it changes how data is transferred. Using rsync with -z compresses the data during transfer.

RayBae1
Junior Member

06-20-2016, 01:33 PM

#16

It sparked some interest for me and I experimented with SCP to move a big file, achieving 260.9MB/s which looks impressive given the 2.5Gbit speed. I just wanted to keep the conversation focused on the original poster, assuming we might face similar delays when handling many smaller files.

RayBae1

06-20-2016, 01:33 PM #16

undead_mcgill
Member

108

06-28-2016, 05:42 AM

#17

After further investigation, it appears the issue lies in the lengthy synchronization phase before transfers begin and the initiation of subsequent steps.

undead_mcgill

06-28-2016, 05:42 AM #17

After further investigation, it appears the issue lies in the lengthy synchronization phase before transfers begin and the initiation of subsequent steps.

KrizoG_
Junior Member

07-02-2016, 09:56 AM

#18

Each file or the subsequent files after the rsync command execution.

KrizoG_

07-02-2016, 09:56 AM #18

Each file or the subsequent files after the rsync command execution.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2