F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop The holes or vents at the base of the IHS are likely for ventilation purposes.

The holes or vents at the base of the IHS are likely for ventilation purposes.

The holes or vents at the base of the IHS are likely for ventilation purposes.

D
dmjcarreira
Junior Member
5
01-02-2016, 06:48 AM
#1
I've shared the update about the new Zen4 CPUs having some openings near the IHS. You can see this in the images (referenced from videocardz and Reddit). Besides looking neat, are there any technical reasons behind it? For example, heat management?
D
dmjcarreira
01-02-2016, 06:48 AM #1

I've shared the update about the new Zen4 CPUs having some openings near the IHS. You can see this in the images (referenced from videocardz and Reddit). Besides looking neat, are there any technical reasons behind it? For example, heat management?

U
Unmute_
Junior Member
39
01-09-2016, 02:09 AM
#2
According to what I understand, it's meant to secure the two CCDs and the IOD onto the IHS. The IHS is attached to the CPU packaging at specific locations, whereas modern CPUs feature a more robust seal.
U
Unmute_
01-09-2016, 02:09 AM #2

According to what I understand, it's meant to secure the two CCDs and the IOD onto the IHS. The IHS is attached to the CPU packaging at specific locations, whereas modern CPUs feature a more robust seal.

R
RoyalUmbreon
Member
162
01-14-2016, 06:55 PM
#3
The spaces exist to remove the capacitors in those spots I think...
R
RoyalUmbreon
01-14-2016, 06:55 PM #3

The spaces exist to remove the capacitors in those spots I think...

_
_LilacSoul
Member
183
01-18-2016, 11:38 AM
#4
The IHS design is more substantial on the Ryzen 4 to maintain the same height as earlier models and ensure compatibility with current coolers. The openings might assist in soldering when the IHS attaches to the dies. It could also help lower the overall weight of both the IHS and CPU.
_
_LilacSoul
01-18-2016, 11:38 AM #4

The IHS design is more substantial on the Ryzen 4 to maintain the same height as earlier models and ensure compatibility with current coolers. The openings might assist in soldering when the IHS attaches to the dies. It could also help lower the overall weight of both the IHS and CPU.

A
Angellr
Member
71
01-22-2016, 06:29 PM
#5
The socket requires moving to LGA and has become thinner.
A
Angellr
01-22-2016, 06:29 PM #5

The socket requires moving to LGA and has become thinner.

D
Draker59
Member
126
01-24-2016, 08:38 PM
#6
In essence, yes. AMD had multiple options to fix the problem, but the easiest and most affordable was simply increasing the thickness of the IHS itself. They might have raised the height of the socket or the CPU base using an interposer, though this would likely have been costly since it only involved adding more copper without needing advanced PCB design. Another possibility was abandoning backward compatibility—breaking a compatibility they had maintained for 17 years with certain coolers since the AM2 era. At that stage, it would have seemed acceptable, especially since Intel also lost compatibility recently. Still, it’s impressive that someone could theoretically fit a 2006 cooler onto an X670 board today without upgraded mounting hardware. Even if no 2006 cooler could handle the 7950X, that would represent remarkable backward compatibility.
D
Draker59
01-24-2016, 08:38 PM #6

In essence, yes. AMD had multiple options to fix the problem, but the easiest and most affordable was simply increasing the thickness of the IHS itself. They might have raised the height of the socket or the CPU base using an interposer, though this would likely have been costly since it only involved adding more copper without needing advanced PCB design. Another possibility was abandoning backward compatibility—breaking a compatibility they had maintained for 17 years with certain coolers since the AM2 era. At that stage, it would have seemed acceptable, especially since Intel also lost compatibility recently. Still, it’s impressive that someone could theoretically fit a 2006 cooler onto an X670 board today without upgraded mounting hardware. Even if no 2006 cooler could handle the 7950X, that would represent remarkable backward compatibility.