F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems The black levels in the X.264 version fall short compared to the original file.

The black levels in the X.264 version fall short compared to the original file.

The black levels in the X.264 version fall short compared to the original file.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
T
TheKillerMomo
Junior Member
48
04-20-2016, 10:59 PM
#1
You're experiencing a shift toward more gray tones in the black areas after converting from lossless FRAPS to X.264. This could be due to compression artifacts or color quantization during the conversion process. Also, using HandBreak as your encoder might affect how colors are preserved. Consider adjusting the encoding settings or trying a different codec for better color fidelity.
T
TheKillerMomo
04-20-2016, 10:59 PM #1

You're experiencing a shift toward more gray tones in the black areas after converting from lossless FRAPS to X.264. This could be due to compression artifacts or color quantization during the conversion process. Also, using HandBreak as your encoder might affect how colors are preserved. Consider adjusting the encoding settings or trying a different codec for better color fidelity.

J
javiberni
Member
85
04-21-2016, 02:25 AM
#2
Verify the compression level. The color depth and contrast values appear reduced.
J
javiberni
04-21-2016, 02:25 AM #2

Verify the compression level. The color depth and contrast values appear reduced.

B
BladeOBlood
Member
190
04-26-2016, 10:06 PM
#3
I understand I’m shifting from lossless video to X.264 around 30 Mbps, but the image quality still suffers regardless of the settings.
B
BladeOBlood
04-26-2016, 10:06 PM #3

I understand I’m shifting from lossless video to X.264 around 30 Mbps, but the image quality still suffers regardless of the settings.

A
Ayla_belle_56
Member
61
04-30-2016, 12:43 AM
#4
Try changing the codec to check if the issue persists.
A
Ayla_belle_56
04-30-2016, 12:43 AM #4

Try changing the codec to check if the issue persists.

A
anthonyyy388
Member
184
05-05-2016, 12:11 AM
#5
It shouldn't appear this way at 30 mbps. Consider employing a different code or program.
A
anthonyyy388
05-05-2016, 12:11 AM #5

It shouldn't appear this way at 30 mbps. Consider employing a different code or program.

X
xX_CadePvP_Xx
Junior Member
18
05-07-2016, 05:23 PM
#6
x264 produces a raw, unpolished look that doesn't suit gameplay clips well.
X
xX_CadePvP_Xx
05-07-2016, 05:23 PM #6

x264 produces a raw, unpolished look that doesn't suit gameplay clips well.

S
sh4dowzjd
Junior Member
8
05-18-2016, 12:42 PM
#7
and why is that?
S
sh4dowzjd
05-18-2016, 12:42 PM #7

and why is that?

G
gamb1no
Member
226
05-19-2016, 06:54 PM
#8
It’s likely acceptable for many people, though it can significantly distort any video you test.
G
gamb1no
05-19-2016, 06:54 PM #8

It’s likely acceptable for many people, though it can significantly distort any video you test.

B
bonecrusher357
Junior Member
12
05-21-2016, 12:37 PM
#9
I don't agree with that. Both x264 and x265 are excellent codecs for video playback (video editing is another topic!). Even Blu Ray relies on x264. These two really stand out when it comes to balancing file size and quality. To OP, there seems to be an issue with your Handbrake settings. I’m not very familiar with the software, but try switching from constant bit rate to a two-pass variable bit rate and increasing your average bitrate. It’s possible Handbrake is restricting the file size somehow. I’m aware Handbrake has presets, so maybe the problem lies with those presets? Edited for spelling
Updated: I discovered an image comparing a ProRes still to an x265 still. The quality of x265 is truly impressive. Keep in mind, x265 is essentially x264 but twice as efficient in compression.
B
bonecrusher357
05-21-2016, 12:37 PM #9

I don't agree with that. Both x264 and x265 are excellent codecs for video playback (video editing is another topic!). Even Blu Ray relies on x264. These two really stand out when it comes to balancing file size and quality. To OP, there seems to be an issue with your Handbrake settings. I’m not very familiar with the software, but try switching from constant bit rate to a two-pass variable bit rate and increasing your average bitrate. It’s possible Handbrake is restricting the file size somehow. I’m aware Handbrake has presets, so maybe the problem lies with those presets? Edited for spelling
Updated: I discovered an image comparing a ProRes still to an x265 still. The quality of x265 is truly impressive. Keep in mind, x265 is essentially x264 but twice as efficient in compression.

N
Neonfluzzycat
Member
199
05-21-2016, 02:21 PM
#10
X264 performs exceptionally well when you need the tiniest file size, though it significantly outperforms other encoders by prioritizing compression over video clarity.
N
Neonfluzzycat
05-21-2016, 02:21 PM #10

X264 performs exceptionally well when you need the tiniest file size, though it significantly outperforms other encoders by prioritizing compression over video clarity.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next