The B650 is pricier, while the X670 and X670E offer more affordable options.
The B650 is pricier, while the X670 and X670E offer more affordable options.
I don't see a reason to not go with X670e if you're considering more expensive boards. Its more likely to have drop in support with future CPUs than B650 which doesn't support PCIe 5.0 16x. Something that might matter if we see more 4x and 8x cards in the next couple generations. 'Budget' X670e boards are already above a certain quality/feature standard. I'd generally stay away from any X670 boards unless its got a specific feature you want/need. B650 is obviously for value, B650e being a weird middle ground between the two that has some decent options and PCIe 5.0 16x support. I personally buy motherboards based on the features and layout. Generally, that pushes me towards the higher end. If you're willing to spend X more for Y feature(s), then I don't see why not. There's a stronger argument right now for getting a higher end board on AM5 than LGA 1700. Intel's next generation might get the same treatment since Intel seems willing to have multigenerational socket/chipset support than ever. LGA 1700 being a really solid platform overall in hindsight.
Consider the capabilities beyond the chipsets. Premium boards provide additional I/O options, but it depends on the vendor to include all those extras. This means some B650 models may surpass X670 boards in features, which you’d overlook if you focus only on the chipset. What are your requirements?
Only two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports and strong Wi-Fi are practical since I can't set up Ethernet near the PC. Good durability and room for future CPU improvements would be ideal.
It meets the needs with a reasonably priced board. It offers sufficient VRM for a 7950X, includes two USB 3 connectors on the front panel, and lacks built-in WiFi. Installing a WiFi card would cost around $20 to $25, which is a good quality adapter.