The Asus AX-89X is an overpowered model.
The Asus AX-89X is an overpowered model.
It's available in both Taiwan and mainland China markets. When compared to the AX11000, its wireless range includes 2.4GHz 4x4 plus 5GHz 8x8, whereas the AX11000 supports 2.4GHz 4x4 and 5GHz 4x4 with 5GHz 4x4. The wired connection is noticeably better. Although the AX11000 offers up to 2.5GbE LAN ports, the AX89X provides both a built-in port and an SFP+ 10GbE port. The WAN port can be switched between a standard 1GbE port or one of the 10GbE ports. After configuration, the other two ports become LAN ports. In Taiwan, the price is roughly 83% lower than the AX11000.
people often question whether someone needs more than 1Gbps on the line or requires 10Gbps to their device. Is this really worth investing in a wireless router, or is it just another example of ASUS expanding its features? Also, based on typical ASUS behavior, it seems like something out of a horror film—like in the latest movie they made, a router malfunctions and starts attacking ISP workers.
Uncertain about their target group. Users with Google Fibre aren't the right fit. Companies with 10GbE internet plans require enterprise options. The real focus isn't likely on general consumers.
most people seeking high-speed Wi-Fi opt for ASUS routers and use their dual 10G ports to connect devices with either 1Gb or 10Gb speeds. *if* the device can handle 10Gb routing, it makes sense since such capability is expected.
Two ports could provide a client with full 10GbE access to a NAS. It might be more practical to purchase a MikroTik CRS305-1G-4S+IN. Would the processor be sufficient to handle 10GbE traffic? I’m skeptical about its capability. It seems like a marketing tactic to attract customers. For many wireless devices—especially IoT ones—the setup could work smoothly without significant performance issues. Regarding the switch, it appears appropriate.
Sure thing... however, a 10Gb LAN doesn't fit that scenario. As I mentioned: feature creep.
The 10GbW WAN to LAN and SFP+ offerings represent significant feature additions. The port configurations align reasonably with a plan serving multiple clients at 1Gbit speeds, though even then a simple network switch suffices—routers can delegate 10G interfaces directly without extra effort. These 10Gbe and 10Gbe WAN to LAN solutions are likely more about unnecessary enhancements than practical needs for the intended audience.
Sure, but when you connect real 10G equipment, remember it’s a wireless router meant for ISP locations, typically placed in convenient spots like the living room. It really doesn’t fit anywhere else because each situation has its own needs and better alternatives exist.
In retrospect, one scenario could work: an ambitious "Linus" setup packed with lots of gear in an office, where a powerful modem and a second-hand enterprise switch handle everything. All the tech stays neatly organized on a cluttered desk.
I understand your perspective. You feel my tone suggests I'm trying to confirm its existence, which isn't what you intended. It seems to fit only a niche segment of consumers, similar to early adopters.