The 3950x offers significant advantages over the 9900K in rendering and gaming performance.
The 3950x offers significant advantages over the 9900K in rendering and gaming performance.
Are you compensated for your work? How much does your effort translate into value? If rendering feels more like a casual project than a necessity, the 9900K is worth considering. The 3950X suits rendering well (especially in After Effects) but isn’t ideal for gaming. The 9900K offers a solid balance, being both reliable and affordable.
The 3950x should be around 750, though prices can vary outside the US. Compare it to a 3000x which should be similar to a 9900K but quicker for multicore tasks. The choice depends on the program; I’d switch from Sony Vegas to Reslove for its great performance and speed. It really depends on workload, as the 3900x matches the 9900K closely and the 3950x is a bit faster.
Your workload benefits from additional cores or threads, so gaming isn't a priority. Certain Adobe applications also don't rely heavily on cores, while most video editing, 3D modeling, and similar programs can utilize all available cores. The 3900X offers a more affordable option similar to the 9900K.