F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Standard access for root user is full privileges.

Standard access for root user is full privileges.

Standard access for root user is full privileges.

P
pfau19
Junior Member
24
03-19-2021, 03:19 AM
#1
The default permissions are typically restricted. To revert, change the directory permissions to a more secure setting like 755 or 700, depending on your needs.
P
pfau19
03-19-2021, 03:19 AM #1

The default permissions are typically restricted. To revert, change the directory permissions to a more secure setting like 755 or 700, depending on your needs.

B
BLVTH
Junior Member
31
03-26-2021, 05:03 PM
#2
It appears you're checking a file permission setting. The value 755 means the owner has full access, others have read and execute rights, and group members have read and execute. The comment suggests this is the standard default.
B
BLVTH
03-26-2021, 05:03 PM #2

It appears you're checking a file permission setting. The value 755 means the owner has full access, others have read and execute rights, and group members have read and execute. The comment suggests this is the standard default.

D
deathhawk666
Junior Member
43
03-26-2021, 05:17 PM
#3
By default, files aren't owned by root unless you specify otherwise. If you're okay with that, 755 or 750 usually works well, depending on the level of security required.
D
deathhawk666
03-26-2021, 05:17 PM #3

By default, files aren't owned by root unless you specify otherwise. If you're okay with that, 755 or 750 usually works well, depending on the level of security required.

P
Phantomz_MC
Member
53
03-27-2021, 08:42 AM
#4
Change permissions for the file at / to allow execution by sudo users.
P
Phantomz_MC
03-27-2021, 08:42 AM #4

Change permissions for the file at / to allow execution by sudo users.

E
Elina_Aada20
Member
141
03-27-2021, 12:15 PM
#5
You need to resolve the issue of ownership by clarifying who holds it and ensuring proper access rights.
E
Elina_Aada20
03-27-2021, 12:15 PM #5

You need to resolve the issue of ownership by clarifying who holds it and ensuring proper access rights.

K
Kay123_
Senior Member
368
03-27-2021, 12:49 PM
#6
You may require a -R based on the level of corruption, but sure it should function.
K
Kay123_
03-27-2021, 12:49 PM #6

You may require a -R based on the level of corruption, but sure it should function.

V
Velj3t
Junior Member
45
03-29-2021, 08:58 AM
#7
I didn't apply recursion incorrectly, so I shouldn't require it
V
Velj3t
03-29-2021, 08:58 AM #7

I didn't apply recursion incorrectly, so I shouldn't require it

W
Warkstos
Junior Member
3
04-04-2021, 10:43 AM
#8
Okay then
W
Warkstos
04-04-2021, 10:43 AM #8

Okay then

M
MarkiLFC
Junior Member
41
04-04-2021, 04:43 PM
#9
Very straightforward, just set the ownership using "chown user directory". For permissions, chmod is what you mentioned before. A notable change (don’t stress too much about being a bit odd) is that if you didn’t update permissions recursively, you could have simply verified each folder inside that directory to check its settings.
M
MarkiLFC
04-04-2021, 04:43 PM #9

Very straightforward, just set the ownership using "chown user directory". For permissions, chmod is what you mentioned before. A notable change (don’t stress too much about being a bit odd) is that if you didn’t update permissions recursively, you could have simply verified each folder inside that directory to check its settings.