F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Speed drops noticeably once pfSense is transferred to new equipment

Speed drops noticeably once pfSense is transferred to new equipment

Speed drops noticeably once pfSense is transferred to new equipment

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
_
_SmolKelly_
Member
200
02-02-2017, 11:51 PM
#11
Disabled hyperthreading and changed power settings from 'Balance Power' to 'Performance' fixed the problem. Now achieving around 500Mbps, I'm still testing for higher speeds but that's satisfactory. This also boosted performance on the bridge I referenced—from about 2.7Gbps to roughly 5.8Gbps. It's not close to 10Gbps yet, but it's significantly better. I'll likely wait until I move game servers to a different machine (currently running the 2667v2s) and take over the CPUs.
_
_SmolKelly_
02-02-2017, 11:51 PM #11

Disabled hyperthreading and changed power settings from 'Balance Power' to 'Performance' fixed the problem. Now achieving around 500Mbps, I'm still testing for higher speeds but that's satisfactory. This also boosted performance on the bridge I referenced—from about 2.7Gbps to roughly 5.8Gbps. It's not close to 10Gbps yet, but it's significantly better. I'll likely wait until I move game servers to a different machine (currently running the 2667v2s) and take over the CPUs.

R
Royalsalt
Junior Member
16
02-20-2017, 05:40 AM
#12
You can reduce electricity usage by using virtualization. My PFSense setup is virtual with numerous VLANs and subnets. A Quad 1GbE NIC and an SFP+ card are connected to the PFSense device. For maximum power savings, consider removing one CPU from the hardware if you're committed to a bare metal configuration.
R
Royalsalt
02-20-2017, 05:40 AM #12

You can reduce electricity usage by using virtualization. My PFSense setup is virtual with numerous VLANs and subnets. A Quad 1GbE NIC and an SFP+ card are connected to the PFSense device. For maximum power savings, consider removing one CPU from the hardware if you're committed to a bare metal configuration.

R
Red_Cubez
Member
50
02-21-2017, 06:20 AM
#13
I don’t mind much about power stuff. It’s better to have separate machines for important tasks so that when I need to interact with the main VM server it doesn’t crash everything. Regarding taking a CPU out, I think I’ll only bring one of the 2667 v2s once I’m set up to move them there.
R
Red_Cubez
02-21-2017, 06:20 AM #13

I don’t mind much about power stuff. It’s better to have separate machines for important tasks so that when I need to interact with the main VM server it doesn’t crash everything. Regarding taking a CPU out, I think I’ll only bring one of the 2667 v2s once I’m set up to move them there.

T
TPG_Khalatic
Member
183
02-21-2017, 12:58 PM
#14
That’s reasonable. I used to run pfsense bare metal for this purpose. However, I realized there’s no need to keep two machines running 24/7 when my homelab has ample power to host a pfsense VM. Plus, I have a test bench ready whenever I need to shut down the homelab for maintenance or updates.
T
TPG_Khalatic
02-21-2017, 12:58 PM #14

That’s reasonable. I used to run pfsense bare metal for this purpose. However, I realized there’s no need to keep two machines running 24/7 when my homelab has ample power to host a pfsense VM. Plus, I have a test bench ready whenever I need to shut down the homelab for maintenance or updates.

T
TMayes136
Member
142
03-10-2017, 12:10 AM
#15
T
TMayes136
03-10-2017, 12:10 AM #15

Pages (2): Previous 1 2