Slow Wi-Fi performance for FTP transfers
Slow Wi-Fi performance for FTP transfers
You're focusing on the WiFi setup rather than high-speed Ethernet connections. The main goal here is resolving the mesh network issue. Channel changes could affect performance but don't necessarily ruin the mesh functionality. It might slow down switching between nodes if not managed properly. Channel width matters because it influences signal strength and bandwidth availability, especially with multiple devices sharing the same frequency. With only 15 active users at a time, good channel selection can help maintain stable connections.
Actually, keeping everything on the same channel can hinder the mesh's function. If clients were spread across multiple channels simultaneously, they would clash. However, when not all channels are active at once, proper setup aids in identifying issues by removing possible causes.
@Alex Atkin UK I understand your point about isolating each AP's channels. Without access to an Orbi, I looked up webUI settings but didn’t find a way to separate mesh points. Are you still using the Nighthawk? Does its SSID match the Orbis’? Since WiFi doesn’t retain signals, it’s either fully on or off. Avoid this if possible. Use distinct SSIDs for 2.4GHz and 5GHz networks, and assign all regular non-IoT devices to the 5GHz network. If not, your devices might switch between channels due to auto-negotiation based on signal strength. @smokedporkroast - Could you run a new WiFi survey this time with clearly labeled SSIDs? Please include the 'Analyze' and 'Networks' tabs for both 2.4GHz and 5GHz.
I reviewed it once more and the 157 channel remains active, though I’m unsure about its source. To be clear, I configured the nighthawk for LAN parties in a distinct zone so we avoid affecting other routers during adjustments. These channels are isolated from the orbis range. I’ve attached a fresh WiFi survey. My primary network runs on channels 48 and 11, the secondary on 6 and 149, and I suspect those won’t interfere—so disabling the second network shouldn’t help. There’s also a third channel at 157 whose purpose I don’t understand. My goal is to boost my computer’s FTP file transfers over Wi-Fi to around 500 Mbps instead of the current 100–160 Mbps range. Thanks.
That aligns with your understanding. Appreciate the clarification. Thanks!