F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks SFP未识别

SFP未识别

SFP未识别

S
Sqwalish
Member
155
04-13-2016, 12:03 AM
#1
I recently received a server (Quanta QSSC- 2ML) equipped with an integrated SFP slot. However, the motherboard fails to detect the SFP device. For context, it uses a 1310nm 1.25Gb SC interface. What might be causing this issue?
S
Sqwalish
04-13-2016, 12:03 AM #1

I recently received a server (Quanta QSSC- 2ML) equipped with an integrated SFP slot. However, the motherboard fails to detect the SFP device. For context, it uses a 1310nm 1.25Gb SC interface. What might be causing this issue?

S
Strayn
Junior Member
21
04-14-2016, 12:46 AM
#2
Eprom configuration seems unusual—why is it set to 1.25Gb instead of the expected 1000Mbit or 1Gb? Shouldn't it match the specifications? Checking the server's capabilities for SFP+ support and 1000Base compatibility would be wise. A 10GBASE SFP+ might be a better fit.
S
Strayn
04-14-2016, 12:46 AM #2

Eprom configuration seems unusual—why is it set to 1.25Gb instead of the expected 1000Mbit or 1Gb? Shouldn't it match the specifications? Checking the server's capabilities for SFP+ support and 1000Base compatibility would be wise. A 10GBASE SFP+ might be a better fit.

R
Reltzy
Member
111
04-15-2016, 11:33 PM
#3
It shouldn't be an issue switching from SFP+ to regular SFP, right?
R
Reltzy
04-15-2016, 11:33 PM #3

It shouldn't be an issue switching from SFP+ to regular SFP, right?

K
KrozenFire
Member
124
04-16-2016, 12:01 AM
#4
K
KrozenFire
04-16-2016, 12:01 AM #4

S
Sachsonia
Junior Member
6
04-16-2016, 04:04 AM
#5
I verified compatibility with SFP+ modules, so I need to look for a different one. Appreciate the guidance!
S
Sachsonia
04-16-2016, 04:04 AM #5

I verified compatibility with SFP+ modules, so I need to look for a different one. Appreciate the guidance!

B
BlaizenBoy
Member
157
04-16-2016, 12:46 PM
#6
The stated speed is 1.25Gbit, which is typically greater than the real data transfer rate.
B
BlaizenBoy
04-16-2016, 12:46 PM #6

The stated speed is 1.25Gbit, which is typically greater than the real data transfer rate.

N
nonrnonr
Member
241
04-17-2016, 03:48 AM
#7
I've worked with SFPs for two decades. I understand SAN can have inconsistent performance. It seems they're running at full capacity now, which is impressive.
N
nonrnonr
04-17-2016, 03:48 AM #7

I've worked with SFPs for two decades. I understand SAN can have inconsistent performance. It seems they're running at full capacity now, which is impressive.

J
jReew
Member
61
04-17-2016, 11:46 AM
#8
It's mainly the PHY rate that needs adjustment for overhead, with the real data rate reaching gigabit levels, much like SERDES operates.
J
jReew
04-17-2016, 11:46 AM #8

It's mainly the PHY rate that needs adjustment for overhead, with the real data rate reaching gigabit levels, much like SERDES operates.

J
Jazzy_Senpai
Member
180
04-17-2016, 08:45 PM
#9
The term gigabit can refer to different rates depending on the encoding, but it often relates to 1.25Gbps when moving to higher speeds like 10G. At those levels, there isn’t a separate second physical layer, which is why it’s sometimes called 1.25G instead of a full 1.5 or 1.25Gb rate.
J
Jazzy_Senpai
04-17-2016, 08:45 PM #9

The term gigabit can refer to different rates depending on the encoding, but it often relates to 1.25Gbps when moving to higher speeds like 10G. At those levels, there isn’t a separate second physical layer, which is why it’s sometimes called 1.25G instead of a full 1.5 or 1.25Gb rate.