F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a high-performance server processor designed for demanding workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a high-performance server processor designed for demanding workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a high-performance server processor designed for demanding workloads.

I
ImChepdesk
Junior Member
Find
3
03-25-2017, 12:03 PM
#1
No one has shared their experiences with overclocking the Ryazan Threadripper 1900X. What frequencies have you managed to reach and under which configurations? The top results mention around 3.9GHz, though many consider those numbers modest.
Reply
Reply
I
ImChepdesk
03-25-2017, 12:03 PM #1

No one has shared their experiences with overclocking the Ryazan Threadripper 1900X. What frequencies have you managed to reach and under which configurations? The top results mention around 3.9GHz, though many consider those numbers modest.

Reply
Reply
O
OldTwiist
Member
Find
137
03-25-2017, 06:40 PM
#2
It is basically an r7 1700x or 1800x, so don't be too hopeful of getting it anywhere over 4.0 or 4.1ghz on water or air. It is an first gen product, and you can clearly feel that.
Reply
Reply
O
OldTwiist
03-25-2017, 06:40 PM #2

It is basically an r7 1700x or 1800x, so don't be too hopeful of getting it anywhere over 4.0 or 4.1ghz on water or air. It is an first gen product, and you can clearly feel that.

Reply
Reply
G
gogofrgl1234
Senior Member
Find
718
04-12-2017, 07:38 AM
#3
3.9GHz was a typical upper limit I recall. Early Ryzen models often reached around 4.0GHz, while many only hit about 3.7GHz per core.
Reply
Reply
G
gogofrgl1234
04-12-2017, 07:38 AM #3

3.9GHz was a typical upper limit I recall. Early Ryzen models often reached around 4.0GHz, while many only hit about 3.7GHz per core.

Reply
Reply
T
Tyler_MC
Member
Find
227
05-02-2017, 02:58 PM
#4
Initial generation TRs perform well on their own clocks, but exceeding them quickly leads to rapid instability.
Reply
Reply
T
Tyler_MC
05-02-2017, 02:58 PM #4

Initial generation TRs perform well on their own clocks, but exceeding them quickly leads to rapid instability.

Reply
Reply
S
Sensei_Ping
Junior Member
Find
14
05-02-2017, 03:37 PM
#5
1920x worked smoothly at 4.3 GHz ;D
Reply
Reply
S
Sensei_Ping
05-02-2017, 03:37 PM #5

1920x worked smoothly at 4.3 GHz ;D

Reply
Reply
L
Lucmus3
Member
Find
60
05-02-2017, 03:56 PM
#6
That component stands out. Even Zen+ found it difficult to reach that stage. You shouldn't assume this will become standard.
Reply
Reply
L
Lucmus3
05-02-2017, 03:56 PM #6

That component stands out. Even Zen+ found it difficult to reach that stage. You shouldn't assume this will become standard.

Reply
Reply
U
UnicornCracker
Senior Member
Find
663
05-02-2017, 04:48 PM
#7
Yeah, that's true. I managed to get friends running at 1700 to 4.1 across all cores, but keeping it steady at 1600 on six with 4.0 was tough and ended up reverting to 3.8. It doesn't really matter since both were later fixed back to the base boost settings—these small frequency tweaks didn't really help with his editing or my 3440x1440 gaming.
Reply
Reply
U
UnicornCracker
05-02-2017, 04:48 PM #7

Yeah, that's true. I managed to get friends running at 1700 to 4.1 across all cores, but keeping it steady at 1600 on six with 4.0 was tough and ended up reverting to 3.8. It doesn't really matter since both were later fixed back to the base boost settings—these small frequency tweaks didn't really help with his editing or my 3440x1440 gaming.

Reply
Reply