F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Ryzen 5 1600 3.7 Ghz High Temp

Ryzen 5 1600 3.7 Ghz High Temp

Ryzen 5 1600 3.7 Ghz High Temp

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
N
nathanmizzi
Member
127
04-02-2017, 02:21 PM
#11
Yes, it is possible to achieve 3200MHz stability using only a 1V SOC.
N
nathanmizzi
04-02-2017, 02:21 PM #11

Yes, it is possible to achieve 3200MHz stability using only a 1V SOC.

I
iiMiaaa
Member
200
04-03-2017, 01:56 AM
#12
yes, prime95 (though not suggested) and realbench and aida64 all succeed.
I
iiMiaaa
04-03-2017, 01:56 AM #12

yes, prime95 (though not suggested) and realbench and aida64 all succeed.

R
rezerxtheboss
Member
78
04-05-2017, 04:11 AM
#13
Yes, prime95 (though not advised) and real bench/aida64 all pass. My setup runs at 3000MHz. When I set DOCP to 2933, the SOC Auto stabilizes at 1.1V. Stress tests are stable, though touching the SOC heatsink makes it very hot—I can't hold my finger there for ten seconds. If you want to manually control the SOC, what voltage is suggested?
R
rezerxtheboss
04-05-2017, 04:11 AM #13

Yes, prime95 (though not advised) and real bench/aida64 all pass. My setup runs at 3000MHz. When I set DOCP to 2933, the SOC Auto stabilizes at 1.1V. Stress tests are stable, though touching the SOC heatsink makes it very hot—I can't hold my finger there for ten seconds. If you want to manually control the SOC, what voltage is suggested?

E
Eusebio06
Senior Member
595
04-05-2017, 02:36 PM
#14
try 1.05 first and then 1
E
Eusebio06
04-05-2017, 02:36 PM #14

try 1.05 first and then 1

K
Kaspolman
Senior Member
434
04-08-2017, 03:19 PM
#15
try 1.05 first and then 1 which one is better for memory testing? memtest86 or prime95 (though not recommended), real bench, or aida64 like you mentioned earlier? if there are any differences, i don’t use it in windows memory tests—just memtest86.
K
Kaspolman
04-08-2017, 03:19 PM #15

try 1.05 first and then 1 which one is better for memory testing? memtest86 or prime95 (though not recommended), real bench, or aida64 like you mentioned earlier? if there are any differences, i don’t use it in windows memory tests—just memtest86.

A
Axel_Crone
Junior Member
13
04-10-2017, 03:41 AM
#16
real bench/aida64
A
Axel_Crone
04-10-2017, 03:41 AM #16

real bench/aida64

M
madone10
Junior Member
37
04-10-2017, 06:53 AM
#17
Do you engage in activities with LLC or allow Auto to handle them?
M
madone10
04-10-2017, 06:53 AM #17

Do you engage in activities with LLC or allow Auto to handle them?

S
Sookabooyat
Junior Member
24
04-11-2017, 04:58 PM
#18
Auto
S
Sookabooyat
04-11-2017, 04:58 PM #18

Auto

V
Vryam
Junior Member
48
04-11-2017, 06:07 PM
#19
Hey, can you check if your processor is working correctly? You have the same chip and MSI B350M Mortar, but you're testing at 3.7ghz with 1.3V. In CPU-Z, your core voltage is showing 1.344V while CPUID HWmonitor lists a maximum of 1.352V. This happened after running Prime/Aida and some Cinebench tests. You also set it to Core LLC mode 2 with over-voltage and over-current protection enabled. Are the voltages in your case normal? I expected around +/- 1.3V as set in BIOS.
V
Vryam
04-11-2017, 06:07 PM #19

Hey, can you check if your processor is working correctly? You have the same chip and MSI B350M Mortar, but you're testing at 3.7ghz with 1.3V. In CPU-Z, your core voltage is showing 1.344V while CPUID HWmonitor lists a maximum of 1.352V. This happened after running Prime/Aida and some Cinebench tests. You also set it to Core LLC mode 2 with over-voltage and over-current protection enabled. Are the voltages in your case normal? I expected around +/- 1.3V as set in BIOS.

C
captinmac
Member
61
04-12-2017, 02:08 AM
#20
My performance is about 1.37v in Ryzen Master, which seems typical.
The absolute limit is around 1.45v, giving us ample space.
C
captinmac
04-12-2017, 02:08 AM #20

My performance is about 1.37v in Ryzen Master, which seems typical.
The absolute limit is around 1.45v, giving us ample space.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next