F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming RUST supports various hardware architectures, including x86, ARM, and MIPS.

RUST supports various hardware architectures, including x86, ARM, and MIPS.

RUST supports various hardware architectures, including x86, ARM, and MIPS.

T
Teekanner
Junior Member
7
06-05-2016, 12:43 AM
#1
Hey guys, I'm very torn at what the game rust likes a lot of. I have a couple rigs that all yield results that don't point to a single piece of hardware preference. So far, the only thing I can really see is that it really likes 8gb or more of ram. Also, it doesn't help I can get MSI afterburner to open up with rust. Main Desktop: i7 3770 3.4Ghz 12gb DDR3 gtx 960 4gb VRAM stored on a 7200 rpm hdd I can get 60fps at 1080p on smaller servers and around 40-60fps on servers like rustified Laptop: i7 920xm 2GHz 8gb DDR3 gtx 460m 1.5gb VRAM stored on an older SSD I can get in the lower 40's playing at 720p on medium settings on most servers Desktop at GF's house: core 2 quad q6600 2.4GHz 4gb DDR2 HD 7770 1gb VRAM stored on a 7200 rpm hdd I am lucky if I hang around the 30's on all lowest settings at 720p The only common thing I really get from this data analysis is that rust runs like crap with 4gb of ram. I thought that the i7 920xm would run like crap being a quad core that runs at 2GHz, but the processor isn't struggling at all. Is it because rust is utilizing all 8 threads? I'm wondering if I upgraded the 4gb of ram on the secondary desktop if it would increase at all, or if the 7770 is holding it back (which I don't think is the case). In any event, I'm going to be selling the current desktop at my GF's house and I am wondering if I should be leaning more towards a fast dual core with hyperthreading like the i3 550 if rust likes a fast processor with 4 threads, or if I should be looking more into a slower quad core like the i5 750. Since it is a secondary computer and I wanna keep the cost cheap, I'm doing a LGA 1156 build as I've done them in the past and I am super impressed with what the first generation i3,i5,i7's can do for how old they are and for how dirt cheap the processors are on eBay. If anyone knows what rust actually likes hardware-wise, please leave comments below. Thanks
T
Teekanner
06-05-2016, 12:43 AM #1

Hey guys, I'm very torn at what the game rust likes a lot of. I have a couple rigs that all yield results that don't point to a single piece of hardware preference. So far, the only thing I can really see is that it really likes 8gb or more of ram. Also, it doesn't help I can get MSI afterburner to open up with rust. Main Desktop: i7 3770 3.4Ghz 12gb DDR3 gtx 960 4gb VRAM stored on a 7200 rpm hdd I can get 60fps at 1080p on smaller servers and around 40-60fps on servers like rustified Laptop: i7 920xm 2GHz 8gb DDR3 gtx 460m 1.5gb VRAM stored on an older SSD I can get in the lower 40's playing at 720p on medium settings on most servers Desktop at GF's house: core 2 quad q6600 2.4GHz 4gb DDR2 HD 7770 1gb VRAM stored on a 7200 rpm hdd I am lucky if I hang around the 30's on all lowest settings at 720p The only common thing I really get from this data analysis is that rust runs like crap with 4gb of ram. I thought that the i7 920xm would run like crap being a quad core that runs at 2GHz, but the processor isn't struggling at all. Is it because rust is utilizing all 8 threads? I'm wondering if I upgraded the 4gb of ram on the secondary desktop if it would increase at all, or if the 7770 is holding it back (which I don't think is the case). In any event, I'm going to be selling the current desktop at my GF's house and I am wondering if I should be leaning more towards a fast dual core with hyperthreading like the i3 550 if rust likes a fast processor with 4 threads, or if I should be looking more into a slower quad core like the i5 750. Since it is a secondary computer and I wanna keep the cost cheap, I'm doing a LGA 1156 build as I've done them in the past and I am super impressed with what the first generation i3,i5,i7's can do for how old they are and for how dirt cheap the processors are on eBay. If anyone knows what rust actually likes hardware-wise, please leave comments below. Thanks

H
HotMilkTea
Member
204
06-17-2016, 01:31 AM
#2
No clear indication present
H
HotMilkTea
06-17-2016, 01:31 AM #2

No clear indication present

B
BerkSahin
Member
106
06-17-2016, 05:47 AM
#3
It isn't fully optimized, but it works on an 860k and R7 260 at 30 fps with the DX9 medium setting.
B
BerkSahin
06-17-2016, 05:47 AM #3

It isn't fully optimized, but it works on an 860k and R7 260 at 30 fps with the DX9 medium setting.

C
233
06-19-2016, 02:13 PM
#4
I run at maximum settings on my R9 390 and I’m aware that an i3 4360 can handle it well alongside the R9 390.
C
captainevan100
06-19-2016, 02:13 PM #4

I run at maximum settings on my R9 390 and I’m aware that an i3 4360 can handle it well alongside the R9 390.

S
Stevetwo
Junior Member
5
06-21-2016, 02:05 PM
#5
What is your RAM capacity?
S
Stevetwo
06-21-2016, 02:05 PM #5

What is your RAM capacity?

W
wpbvjccc
Member
126
06-21-2016, 02:57 PM
#6
They have 32GB of DDR3 memory installed.
W
wpbvjccc
06-21-2016, 02:57 PM #6

They have 32GB of DDR3 memory installed.

9
992x
Senior Member
506
07-09-2016, 04:51 AM
#7
9
992x
07-09-2016, 04:51 AM #7

M
matwid
Junior Member
42
07-09-2016, 09:23 AM
#8
I operate smoothly at maximum configurations with a smooth frame rate of 30 frames per second.
M
matwid
07-09-2016, 09:23 AM #8

I operate smoothly at maximum configurations with a smooth frame rate of 30 frames per second.