Report of significant FPS decline across gaming titles
Report of significant FPS decline across gaming titles
Best: MoBo memory QVL list available.
For a DDR4 version of the MoBo, this resource provides tested RAM modules verified by Gigabyte.
With DDR4 support, ideal frequencies are around 3000 Mhz or 3200 Mhz, matching the supported speeds.
In terms of capacity, 2x 8GB (16 GB) works well now. For gaming or 3D rendering, a total of 32 GB would be preferable, and for workstation tasks, 64 GB is recommended. This aligns with the maximum RAM capacity offered by that model.
Overall, if you aim for speeds of 3000/3200 Mhz, choosing from the memory QVL is optimal. However, if you prioritize stability over speed and are comfortable using JEDEC standard frequencies (2133/2400/2666 Mhz), it doesn’t affect your choice.
There’s only one top pick: Peerless Assassin 120 SE.
PC part details:
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/hY...sa...a120-se-d3
Please note: the CPU cooler is 155mm tall, so verify your PC case clearance. If needed, let me know and I’ll find an alternative cooler.
There are numerous Gigabyte MoBos with B760M naming; since I’m unsure which you have, I selected a random B760M DDR4-compatible model for comparison.
Link: https://www.gigabyte.com/Comparison/Cons...=9350,9590
B760 chipset offers higher RAM speeds compared to H610, faster USB ports, and additional features on the board. Check the comparison for more details.
Thank you, I decided to switch the mobo back to the H610.
Mobo:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0BPMH3N7H?r...asin_title
RAM:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07RM39V5F?r...asin_title
Cooler:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0821GBNHM?r...asin_title
The cooler seems quite different from the one you mentioned. I don’t know much about them.
And the case I received is:
CiT Mirage F6 Mid Tower Gaming Case - Black - CIT-MIRAGE-F6
Available @ CCL: CiT Mirage F6 Gaming Mid Tower Case in Black with Tempered Glass. Suitable for ATX, MATX, and ITX motherboards. Comes with RGB Fans. Mfg Code: CIT-MIRAGE-F6
www.cclonline.com
Much better MoBo.
A significant change here.
The one I linked is the Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE, which stands out as one of the top-performing large air coolers available. Thanks to its price, it also offers great value.
The item you mentioned is a budget 92mm Cooler Master H410R cooler, which falls short in performance compared to average standards. Even with two units, their combined output wouldn’t match the 120 SE model’s dual 120mm fans and twin towers.
The 120 SE in black, without LED, is available on Amazon UK:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Thermalright-Pe...B0B4G8QKZP
It also comes in RGB, available on Amazon UK:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Thermalright-Pe...B0B4G8JKQ9
Another version in RGB and white is offered here:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Thermalright-Pe...B0B4G8PHSV
As I mentioned, unless your PC case has less than 155mm clearance for the CPU cooler, there’s no compelling reason not to opt for the 120 SE (or similar models).
If your case is narrower, a cooler like the Thermalright Peerless Assassin 90 SE would be a much better fit (110mm tall, twin tower design), and it’s available in black, chrome/gray, and white:
https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/products/com...TW,fL88TW/
When selecting a CPU cooler, always prioritize the best option, as it provides superior thermal management and better performance than average or subpar alternatives.
The price variation is almost negligible compared to the performance gains. That's why I went for the RGB model—it would be a great upgrade! The case has an 160mm cooler height, which is sufficient. I'm planning to assemble this build over the weekend; it looks much better than what I originally had. Cheers
Assemble the build and tested a UBM:
https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/68530051
Significantly improved, particularly with the GPU. Previously using the Samsung 870 EVO as boot drive, but realized the Samsung PM961 from my old laptop is much faster for switching over.
Also enabled XMP in the BIOS, which should help boost the RAM performance.
👍 PM961 is a PCI-E 3.0 M.2 NVMe SSD, whereas the 870 Evo uses a SATA SSD. The performance difference on benchmarks is more than double, but in practice it's hard to notice unless you test with large files. In real situations, the noticeable improvement comes when handling big data, where the speeds become apparent.