F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Reduce 4K graphic settings by lowering resolution, brightness, contrast, and sharpness.

Reduce 4K graphic settings by lowering resolution, brightness, contrast, and sharpness.

Reduce 4K graphic settings by lowering resolution, brightness, contrast, and sharpness.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
Lillen110
Junior Member
33
11-23-2016, 09:22 PM
#1
I had a 4K display but the budget was limited. My GPU is a 980Ti. For AAA titles, it runs between 30-60 FPS on ultra settings. To get the best visuals without big performance drops, I’d suggest sticking to 1080p. Games don’t look much better there either.
L
Lillen110
11-23-2016, 09:22 PM #1

I had a 4K display but the budget was limited. My GPU is a 980Ti. For AAA titles, it runs between 30-60 FPS on ultra settings. To get the best visuals without big performance drops, I’d suggest sticking to 1080p. Games don’t look much better there either.

H
homedawg_
Member
131
12-08-2016, 11:18 AM
#2
motion blur, aa, hair, high resolution lol jk
H
homedawg_
12-08-2016, 11:18 AM #2

motion blur, aa, hair, high resolution lol jk

G
gris0713
Junior Member
9
12-10-2016, 07:59 AM
#3
You probably don't require an AA battery, and the distinction becomes clearer with a larger screen, meaning a 24 or 27-inch 4K display might have been unnecessary.
G
gris0713
12-10-2016, 07:59 AM #3

You probably don't require an AA battery, and the distinction becomes clearer with a larger screen, meaning a 24 or 27-inch 4K display might have been unnecessary.

S
SubTemp
Junior Member
41
12-13-2016, 07:29 PM
#4
980 TI and 27" 4k monitor owner here... I can promise you that either you guys have bad eyes or haven't tried to see the difference yourself. I had a 27" 1080P monitor right next to my 4k monitor playing the same game with the 4k monitor having lower graphical settings... And the 4k look 20X times better. There is an immediate and massively noticable difference between the two. Without a doubt. Even blind tested this with my mom and family yesterday. For sure not a "waste" lol.
S
SubTemp
12-13-2016, 07:29 PM #4

980 TI and 27" 4k monitor owner here... I can promise you that either you guys have bad eyes or haven't tried to see the difference yourself. I had a 27" 1080P monitor right next to my 4k monitor playing the same game with the 4k monitor having lower graphical settings... And the 4k look 20X times better. There is an immediate and massively noticable difference between the two. Without a doubt. Even blind tested this with my mom and family yesterday. For sure not a "waste" lol.

T
Tropiko14
Member
201
12-13-2016, 07:54 PM
#5
I notice a subtle variation, not quite the sudden jump from 720 to 1080 pixels. Game textures still need significant improvement to reach true 4K quality. A major boost in GPU performance would be essential for them to truly stand out.
T
Tropiko14
12-13-2016, 07:54 PM #5

I notice a subtle variation, not quite the sudden jump from 720 to 1080 pixels. Game textures still need significant improvement to reach true 4K quality. A major boost in GPU performance would be essential for them to truly stand out.

S
Snakehammer19
Junior Member
24
12-14-2016, 04:01 AM
#6
If you're facing issues with scaling, performance, and losing quality, it might not be worth the effort. Higher resolutions like 1440p perform better in those scenarios.
S
Snakehammer19
12-14-2016, 04:01 AM #6

If you're facing issues with scaling, performance, and losing quality, it might not be worth the effort. Higher resolutions like 1440p perform better in those scenarios.

P
Postinq
Member
222
12-15-2016, 08:31 AM
#7
What are you referring to? The settings are extreme—125% scaling, 4K at 27 inches, Windows 10. Everything looks clear and sharp for everyone who can see it comfortably at their desk. I often open over 90 rows of Excel at full scale without any issues. It's like having a small text on a novel. Have you ever used a 4K display? Lol.
P
Postinq
12-15-2016, 08:31 AM #7

What are you referring to? The settings are extreme—125% scaling, 4K at 27 inches, Windows 10. Everything looks clear and sharp for everyone who can see it comfortably at their desk. I often open over 90 rows of Excel at full scale without any issues. It's like having a small text on a novel. Have you ever used a 4K display? Lol.

_
_ErikThePanda_
Posting Freak
807
12-15-2016, 03:55 PM
#8
I've tried 24 and 27-inch screens, but they look very small. 4K resolution doesn't work well on them—it's too limited for useful tasks unless you apply scaling.
_
_ErikThePanda_
12-15-2016, 03:55 PM #8

I've tried 24 and 27-inch screens, but they look very small. 4K resolution doesn't work well on them—it's too limited for useful tasks unless you apply scaling.

V
VanillaZ0nE
Junior Member
9
12-15-2016, 06:22 PM
#9
I worked on my 4K monitor for eight hours daily and experienced mixed reactions. At full scaling, text felt like viewing an iPhone, while Windows scaling at 125% often showed apps with poor clarity—blurry text or distorted menus. Office 365 and Skype looked subpar. 1440p seemed better overall. Still, 4K offers a nice look in certain scenarios.
V
VanillaZ0nE
12-15-2016, 06:22 PM #9

I worked on my 4K monitor for eight hours daily and experienced mixed reactions. At full scaling, text felt like viewing an iPhone, while Windows scaling at 125% often showed apps with poor clarity—blurry text or distorted menus. Office 365 and Skype looked subpar. 1440p seemed better overall. Still, 4K offers a nice look in certain scenarios.

R
revender
Junior Member
25
12-16-2016, 06:23 AM
#10
The choice ultimately depends on personal taste. A size of 24"-27" offers a crisp appearance, which I find appealing, but I’d favor 34"-36" to make better use of the display space. OP, don’t turn off AA entirely—sometimes it still makes a noticeable impact. It varies by game and the type of AA employed. Try reducing shadow quality, water effects, particles, and if necessary, increase detail and AF settings. Consider using SSAO instead of HBAO. I suggest enabling MFAA in the NVIDIA Control Panel to bypass MSAA for similar quality and improved performance.
R
revender
12-16-2016, 06:23 AM #10

The choice ultimately depends on personal taste. A size of 24"-27" offers a crisp appearance, which I find appealing, but I’d favor 34"-36" to make better use of the display space. OP, don’t turn off AA entirely—sometimes it still makes a noticeable impact. It varies by game and the type of AA employed. Try reducing shadow quality, water effects, particles, and if necessary, increase detail and AF settings. Consider using SSAO instead of HBAO. I suggest enabling MFAA in the NVIDIA Control Panel to bypass MSAA for similar quality and improved performance.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next