r7 2700x or i5 9600k suitable for 1080p gaming
r7 2700x or i5 9600k suitable for 1080p gaming
You're considering two CPUs for your gaming rig: R7 2700X and i5 9600K. For 144Hz 1080p gaming, the i5 9600K offers better performance and future-proofing, especially for newer titles like Shadow of the Tomb Raider. The R7 2700X is powerful but may be more suited for heavier workloads or overclocking. Based on your needs, the i5 9600K is the better choice.
The Intel vs AMD debate is still ongoing. One offers stronger single-thread performance while the other provides more thread options. I lean toward AMD because of the extra thread capacity, though it might be slower now but could improve later. Think of it as a decision rather than a recommendation. People might have different views, and motherboard quality could also play a role in the outcome.
You'd prefer an R5 3600 with 3600mhz CL16 RAM for smooth 144hz/240hz gaming. A $100 RX 570 works well for CS:GO, handles AAA titles at medium/high settings in 1080p. The RX 5700 offers better performance or similar value. What's your budget and country? Do you have a monitor already?
Usually suggest AMD now, but for this particular scenario the 9600k might outperform a 2700x. Still, it seems in CSGO the third-gen Ryzen are beating Intel in some cases. Could be a misunderstanding. When it comes to newer titles, you'll likely benefit from more cores and threads over time. I’d probably pick a 3700x.
opt for the most affordable combo you can find (motherboard and CPU pair) so you can redirect the remaining funds elsewhere. my previous rig used a 2070 and a 9th gen i5, which had trouble keeping 144 frames at high or ultra settings—thought about the 2017 Star Wars and Mordhau, which are significantly more demanding than CS:GO.
Ryzen 3000 performs better in CSGO compared to Intel. For players focused on that game and planning for upcoming titles needing more threads, this CPU is ideal.
It has six thread slots, which is better than four. Think of it as a fairly slow i5 8400. It’s not the full 8400K, since it runs at its maximum speed but isn’t unlocked at top settings. Still slower than a non-K 8400. I’d rather have a 2600 instead.