Question regarding the Valley Benchmark's usefulness
Question regarding the Valley Benchmark's usefulness
Hello, I recently conducted a performance evaluation on my system utilizing the extremeHD presents benchmark on Valley, achieving a score of 1515. This result is disappointing considering my hardware configuration and falls below average for similar setups. I would greatly appreciate any suggestions you might have. Furthermore, my central processing unit is overclocked to 4.3 GHz and occasionally reaches 4.5 GHz with turbo boost. My system specifications include a FX 8350 processor, an NVIDIA GTX 970 graphics card in an MSI ARMOR 4 GB enclosure, paired with an Asus 970 gaming motherboard. I have 16GB of RAM and a white EVGA 600-watt power supply. My cooling solution consists of an Antec 120mm CPU water cooler, housed within a Corsair 750D case.
Absolutely, so you’re wondering if upgrading to an i5-4590 would be helpful? I'm holding off on constructing a completely new PC until the latest Ryzen processors are released, but I’m experiencing noticeable pauses in my games now and suspect it’s a problem with the processor.
The Intel Core i5-4590 necessitates a complete system overhaul. This would likely involve a new motherboard, central processing unit, and potentially a fresh operating system license. However, is Valley capable of handling multiple threads? The older, less powerful FX-8350 performs noticeably better when running games that utilize numerous threads. Back in its time, games weren’t designed to efficiently use multiple processing cores like they are now. I maintain my FX-8350 and am somewhat taken aback by its continued effectiveness (assuming you have reasonable expectations).