Question about perfomance with this build
Question about perfomance with this build
Hello, I am close to buy a combo upgrade that includes a 9400f (I own an A10 7850K) and at the moment I have a rx460 2gb. Theres no gameplay video that shows me the benchmarks of the settings I am going to use, since I play competitive games, where you want FPS stability more than video quality, as you already know.
1) With my current CPU I have horrendous FPS stability, a thing that I noticed is that I don't gain a noticeable amount of FPS when switching resolutions and settings, in some cases I don't gain FPS at all. Will I see a big impact on perfomance with the CPU change? Will that stability issue be fixed?
2) Being more specific, how well do you think this combo will run games like Fortnite in low settings and a resolution of 1440x900 or lower (I don't plan playing on 1080, at least on online games) will I be able to achieve 75 constant fps? If you don't mind I would also like to know about games in general (Witcher 3, Skyrim, Dark Souls 3, PoE, etc).
Thanks in advance
This is due to the fact that you presently possess an APU instead of a genuine CPU. Furthermore, its performance is significantly less than that of the 9400f, meaning you will definitely observe a noticeable improvement in CPU capabilities.
However, although an RX 460 with 2GB of memory might suffice for games such as Fortnite, it does not meet the minimum specifications needed to play Dark Souls 3.
Thank you for your response! I’ve been advised that the Ryzen 2600 or 3600 would be a preferable choice, though I remain doubtful given my past experience with AMD and the frequent assertion that Intel performs better in gaming. What are your thoughts? Currently, the 9400F (at $94) is remarkably inexpensive when compared to the 2600/3600 options ($225/$267).
The Ryzen series represents AMD’s subsequent development following the unsuccessful Bulldozer processor. It presents a significant advancement, employing the innovative “Zen” design. The Ryzen 3600 incorporates the enhanced Zen 2 architecture and is recognized for offering exceptional value.
Intel generally possesses greater raw gaming performance; however, Ryzen provides superior value when considering multitasking and streaming activities in many regions. The Intel Core i5-9400F can be a suitable choice, easily managing even high-end graphics cards like those capable of running Dark Souls 3 at maximum settings. Be mindful of power consumption and ensure your power supply unit (PSU) meets the requirements if upgrading your GPU.
The 9400F achieves performance nearly equivalent to the Ryzen 2600 on Passmark benchmarks (12,139 compared to 13,503). The Ryzen 3600 reaches a score of 20,045, necessitating a substantial GPU upgrade for optimal results. The 8400 was previously favored for value-oriented gaming, and the 9400 continues this pattern. Note that “F” designates an absence of integrated graphics within the CPU – this is irrelevant if you have a dedicated graphics card.
Core i5-9400F
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu...Hz&id=3397
Ryzen 5 2600
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu...00&id=3243
Ryzen 5 3600
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu...00&id=3481
Thank you for the detailed information. Concerning the power supply unit (PSU), I possess an OCZ 600W SXS model; I’m uncertain of its purchase date – it was a gift when I previously used a GT 240. I've been advised and have verified that it is suitable for high-performance graphics cards. My concern is that due to its age, it may fail unexpectedly, even though I haven’t observed any unusual sounds or excessive heat and routinely maintain it with an air compressor. Could you provide insight into typical power supply unit lifespans?
This power supply unit (PSU) was released in 2008, making it approximately eleven years old. Its continued functionality hinges largely on its usage history; however, provided you’ve consistently removed accumulated dust and avoided prolonged operation under intense gaming loads, it may still be serviceable. The initial SXS models were known for their solid construction. Following this, OCZ began contracting production to lower-tier manufacturers with inferior build quality, fueling a trend of excessive promotion.
Over time, a PSU typically degrades, losing roughly 10% of its rated wattage due to weakening capacitors. Nevertheless, the 540 watts of effective power remain sufficient for your system. Key indicators of an aging PSU include visible capacitor leakage and noisy fan bearings. The capacitors should display clean, dry silver-colored “slit foil” aluminum tops. You may also observe increased voltage instability on the +12 volt lines as time progresses. Voltage measurements can be obtained using free software such as HWiNFO64.
Fan maintenance, including lubrication or replacement, is feasible if you possess technical skills – numerous instructional videos are available on YouTube. It could potentially operate for another five years with proper care and moderate use. However, it’s not ideally suited for future upgrades due to its limited three SATA connections. When a PSU exhibits issues—whether visually apparent, audibly problematic, or displaying voltage irregularities—replacement is the recommended course of action. A faulty PSU can irreparably damage vulnerable components struggling to receive adequate power.
I’ve employed it extensively, frequently going without shutting it down for entire days. If a power supply unit fails, could it also damage other components? For my current construction, I'm additionally modifying the enclosure; I’m uncertain if this aging PSU is compatible with newer cases (with the PSU positioned at the base). My case features an opening above the motherboard.
Certainly, as I previously mentioned, a failing power supply unit (PSU) may negatively impact other components, potentially causing their failure. Regarding mounting options—top or bottom—most PSUs are adaptable to either orientation, so this isn’t a concern.