F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Purchasing a new CPU or motherboard involves careful selection and research to ensure compatibility and performance.

Purchasing a new CPU or motherboard involves careful selection and research to ensure compatibility and performance.

Purchasing a new CPU or motherboard involves careful selection and research to ensure compatibility and performance.

L
lillboman91
Member
164
12-05-2019, 07:42 PM
#1
Hello, I'm considering purchasing a new CPU. I'm leaning towards the Ryzen 5 1600AF with an MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX, planning to overclock it and eventually upgrade to the Ryzen 5 3600 later. Alternatively, I'm thinking about Intel options. My GPU is an RX580 Sapphire Nitro+ with 8GB RAM. I use my PC for MATLAB, programming, and mainly gaming, including COD Modern Warfare at maximum settings.
L
lillboman91
12-05-2019, 07:42 PM #1

Hello, I'm considering purchasing a new CPU. I'm leaning towards the Ryzen 5 1600AF with an MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX, planning to overclock it and eventually upgrade to the Ryzen 5 3600 later. Alternatively, I'm thinking about Intel options. My GPU is an RX580 Sapphire Nitro+ with 8GB RAM. I use my PC for MATLAB, programming, and mainly gaming, including COD Modern Warfare at maximum settings.

S
StarKillerSTF
Member
125
12-05-2019, 08:44 PM
#2
Budget?
S
StarKillerSTF
12-05-2019, 08:44 PM #2

Budget?

X
xanderzone317
Posting Freak
957
12-05-2019, 10:19 PM
#3
They don’t carry anything meaningful except the 9900KS for high-end gaming at 240+Hz. Outside of that, they’re not competitive until the tenth generation. The real choices are between 1600AF and 3600—1600AF is a middle ground while 3600 offers more value. It really depends on your budget, but unless you have a tight one, I’d pick the 3600 if possible.
X
xanderzone317
12-05-2019, 10:19 PM #3

They don’t carry anything meaningful except the 9900KS for high-end gaming at 240+Hz. Outside of that, they’re not competitive until the tenth generation. The real choices are between 1600AF and 3600—1600AF is a middle ground while 3600 offers more value. It really depends on your budget, but unless you have a tight one, I’d pick the 3600 if possible.

E
elemcee
Member
54
12-06-2019, 06:38 AM
#4
I reside in Egypt where the currency isn't used, making that less relevant. However, I can help you find a Ryzen 5 2600 or Intel i5-9400f within your budget.
E
elemcee
12-06-2019, 06:38 AM #4

I reside in Egypt where the currency isn't used, making that less relevant. However, I can help you find a Ryzen 5 2600 or Intel i5-9400f within your budget.

S
slayer__is
Senior Member
521
12-10-2019, 03:16 PM
#5
I’m struggling to meet my budget right now. I can only afford Ryzen 5 2600 or Intel i5-9400f, not the Ryzen 5 3600. The 1600AF is a middle ground because it balances performance and cost. Will it slow down your GPU? With your current i5-3470, you’re getting smooth gameplay at 60–70 FPS, but you’re still experiencing lag in Discord and other moments. It’s a trade-off between power and affordability.
S
slayer__is
12-10-2019, 03:16 PM #5

I’m struggling to meet my budget right now. I can only afford Ryzen 5 2600 or Intel i5-9400f, not the Ryzen 5 3600. The 1600AF is a middle ground because it balances performance and cost. Will it slow down your GPU? With your current i5-3470, you’re getting smooth gameplay at 60–70 FPS, but you’re still experiencing lag in Discord and other moments. It’s a trade-off between power and affordability.

K
kungfutyla
Posting Freak
780
12-20-2019, 01:37 AM
#6
On a limited budget, the 1600AF stands out as the optimal option. It outperforms the 9400F and matches the 2600 in price, though it’s an older model. Its single-core performance falls short of newer systems, and the memory controller isn’t as robust. This usually caps RAM speeds around 3200Mhz, and highly single-threaded titles may see a minor FPS drop. Still, the impact is minimal—especially for games like CS:GO where 350FPS is more noticeable than 400. Overall, the 1600AF remains the top pick for you.
K
kungfutyla
12-20-2019, 01:37 AM #6

On a limited budget, the 1600AF stands out as the optimal option. It outperforms the 9400F and matches the 2600 in price, though it’s an older model. Its single-core performance falls short of newer systems, and the memory controller isn’t as robust. This usually caps RAM speeds around 3200Mhz, and highly single-threaded titles may see a minor FPS drop. Still, the impact is minimal—especially for games like CS:GO where 350FPS is more noticeable than 400. Overall, the 1600AF remains the top pick for you.

T
TheusHG
Junior Member
15
12-20-2019, 02:59 AM
#7
My display runs at 60Hz, but I’m seeing 65–70 FPS with the i5-3470, which is fine as long as it stays above 60. Thanks a lot!
T
TheusHG
12-20-2019, 02:59 AM #7

My display runs at 60Hz, but I’m seeing 65–70 FPS with the i5-3470, which is fine as long as it stays above 60. Thanks a lot!