F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Problem with personal wireless modem and internet service provider connection.

Problem with personal wireless modem and internet service provider connection.

Problem with personal wireless modem and internet service provider connection.

C
Cqristopher
Member
241
09-19-2016, 10:28 AM
#1
From another subject you mentioned earlier, when your modem connects to a network, they send a file with setup details that specify the speed allocation based on your plan. In this case, it seems the file might not match your device's requirements, causing it to enter safe mode or behave unexpectedly. It's unclear how the Netgear modem will handle this situation, but choosing a modem for a network provider is still a tough decision.
C
Cqristopher
09-19-2016, 10:28 AM #1

From another subject you mentioned earlier, when your modem connects to a network, they send a file with setup details that specify the speed allocation based on your plan. In this case, it seems the file might not match your device's requirements, causing it to enter safe mode or behave unexpectedly. It's unclear how the Netgear modem will handle this situation, but choosing a modem for a network provider is still a tough decision.

X
xXFirewitherXx
Posting Freak
878
09-19-2016, 08:35 PM
#2
I used Time Warner and faced a similar issue with them. Their service sends a configuration file to the device via the modem, which can restrict usage if the device isn't on their approved list. I had a modem where using Cox gave me 500 Mbps but with TWC it only provided under 100 Mbps while charging 300. When I contacted them, I explained they have the authority to impose these limits since they're not the hardware manufacturer. It turned out to be fine for me despite my frustration.
X
xXFirewitherXx
09-19-2016, 08:35 PM #2

I used Time Warner and faced a similar issue with them. Their service sends a configuration file to the device via the modem, which can restrict usage if the device isn't on their approved list. I had a modem where using Cox gave me 500 Mbps but with TWC it only provided under 100 Mbps while charging 300. When I contacted them, I explained they have the authority to impose these limits since they're not the hardware manufacturer. It turned out to be fine for me despite my frustration.

A
ArchangelZ21
Member
209
10-06-2016, 09:09 AM
#3
It appears there may be an issue with the setup. Consider reaching out to your ISP for the serial connection settings so you can configure it directly.
A
ArchangelZ21
10-06-2016, 09:09 AM #3

It appears there may be an issue with the setup. Consider reaching out to your ISP for the serial connection settings so you can configure it directly.

M
Morphire
Member
244
10-07-2016, 07:24 AM
#4
I'm trying to understand what actions can be taken right now. It seems strange that restrictions exist even though the device meets the technical requirements listed on their site. I think my TP-Link model might not have been included in their approved list, but it still followed the specifications. According to representatives from TWC/Spectrum support, there are no restrictions affecting my home setup. @Levisallanon, could you clarify what settings you're considering? I'm planning to check them and will ask if needed. Thanks ahead of time! Your feedback so far is valuable. This situation is really frustrating. I own the same TP-Link device at my home in Corpus Christ, Texas, and my ISP is Grande Communications. I've had a smooth service setup with no signal issues or mitigation problems. They use coaxial cable internet as well.
M
Morphire
10-07-2016, 07:24 AM #4

I'm trying to understand what actions can be taken right now. It seems strange that restrictions exist even though the device meets the technical requirements listed on their site. I think my TP-Link model might not have been included in their approved list, but it still followed the specifications. According to representatives from TWC/Spectrum support, there are no restrictions affecting my home setup. @Levisallanon, could you clarify what settings you're considering? I'm planning to check them and will ask if needed. Thanks ahead of time! Your feedback so far is valuable. This situation is really frustrating. I own the same TP-Link device at my home in Corpus Christ, Texas, and my ISP is Grande Communications. I've had a smooth service setup with no signal issues or mitigation problems. They use coaxial cable internet as well.

D
dodotof
Junior Member
7
10-07-2016, 08:03 AM
#5
Refer to paragraph 5.3.1 for instructions on configuring your router. You may need to consult your ISP or their website to determine the appropriate settings.
D
dodotof
10-07-2016, 08:03 AM #5

Refer to paragraph 5.3.1 for instructions on configuring your router. You may need to consult your ISP or their website to determine the appropriate settings.

N
NightmareAura
Junior Member
15
10-07-2016, 12:26 PM
#6
A few ISPs struggle with customer support for modems. It seems you might be using one of them, as they often provide assistance due to FCC rules, even though they sometimes refuse to update older firmware. Comcast maintains a list of tested modems and regularly releases new firmware updates. However, some ISPs don’t offer this support at all. If you encounter issues with outdated firmware, you might consider filing an FCC complaint.
N
NightmareAura
10-07-2016, 12:26 PM #6

A few ISPs struggle with customer support for modems. It seems you might be using one of them, as they often provide assistance due to FCC rules, even though they sometimes refuse to update older firmware. Comcast maintains a list of tested modems and regularly releases new firmware updates. However, some ISPs don’t offer this support at all. If you encounter issues with outdated firmware, you might consider filing an FCC complaint.

A
Anson1108
Member
102
10-12-2016, 02:23 PM
#7
It seems you're likely facing a recurring problem with your ISP. After trying various modem/router combinations and consulting tech support, the issue persists despite clear indications pointing to the ISP's side. The company offered a solution for $79.99, which I accepted, hoping it would resolve the matter. However, the situation remains unresolved, and I'm left with a refund as a potential outcome. This suggests the problem lies with the ISP rather than my setup. The last technician even questioned why I couldn't use their own modem, highlighting the lack of support in this case.
A
Anson1108
10-12-2016, 02:23 PM #7

It seems you're likely facing a recurring problem with your ISP. After trying various modem/router combinations and consulting tech support, the issue persists despite clear indications pointing to the ISP's side. The company offered a solution for $79.99, which I accepted, hoping it would resolve the matter. However, the situation remains unresolved, and I'm left with a refund as a potential outcome. This suggests the problem lies with the ISP rather than my setup. The last technician even questioned why I couldn't use their own modem, highlighting the lack of support in this case.

S
Sertero28
Senior Member
589
10-18-2016, 06:03 AM
#8
Explain your stance clearly, saying you’re not using their modem since it’s unreliable. If they disapprove, they can involve the FCC. File a complaint with the FCC and let them manage it. The charter recently got fined for making poor decisions after the merger. I’m sure the FCC is ready to handle this situation.
S
Sertero28
10-18-2016, 06:03 AM #8

Explain your stance clearly, saying you’re not using their modem since it’s unreliable. If they disapprove, they can involve the FCC. File a complaint with the FCC and let them manage it. The charter recently got fined for making poor decisions after the merger. I’m sure the FCC is ready to handle this situation.

X
xRickyZ
Junior Member
2
10-18-2016, 01:05 PM
#9
Complaint submitted eagerly; fully committed to ensuring they fulfill their responsibilities. Their approach is entirely unreasonable considering the careless management of this matter, especially since I’m a paying client relying on their services locally.
X
xRickyZ
10-18-2016, 01:05 PM #9

Complaint submitted eagerly; fully committed to ensuring they fulfill their responsibilities. Their approach is entirely unreasonable considering the careless management of this matter, especially since I’m a paying client relying on their services locally.

D
Devil_Breaker
Junior Member
36
10-20-2016, 09:04 AM
#10
I recently encountered the same problem. Using 192.168.100.1 as per some paperwork led to no settings options indicating bridge mode, while 192.168.1.1 worked perfectly. This recurring issue appeared in many searches, which is why I updated the thread.
D
Devil_Breaker
10-20-2016, 09:04 AM #10

I recently encountered the same problem. Using 192.168.100.1 as per some paperwork led to no settings options indicating bridge mode, while 192.168.1.1 worked perfectly. This recurring issue appeared in many searches, which is why I updated the thread.