F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Playing games on an Xeon processor Optimizing performance for gaming High-performance computing options available

Playing games on an Xeon processor Optimizing performance for gaming High-performance computing options available

Playing games on an Xeon processor Optimizing performance for gaming High-performance computing options available

B
ByFeNix1350
Senior Member
502
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#1
Shloud, consider Dual Xeon e5-2623 v4 or I7-4470k. You had a strong gaming rig with an older Core i7 and a 1080Ti GPU. The results weren’t great—your performance dropped about 15%. It might be the hardware mismatch or the software limitations. Try the Xeon first; it could offer better results.
B
ByFeNix1350
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #1

Shloud, consider Dual Xeon e5-2623 v4 or I7-4470k. You had a strong gaming rig with an older Core i7 and a 1080Ti GPU. The results weren’t great—your performance dropped about 15%. It might be the hardware mismatch or the software limitations. Try the Xeon first; it could offer better results.

B
Bymaster46_TW
Member
63
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#2
These chips run at lower clock speeds, but with four cores you experience strong performance from the Numa, making the results impressive.
B
Bymaster46_TW
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #2

These chips run at lower clock speeds, but with four cores you experience strong performance from the Numa, making the results impressive.

S
Shiba_lnu
Junior Member
9
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#3
It might simply mean Xeons have reduced single-core speed and limited RAM capacity.
S
Shiba_lnu
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #3

It might simply mean Xeons have reduced single-core speed and limited RAM capacity.

Z
Zed_Zip_
Member
69
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#4
Most games favor strong single-core performance rather than many threads. You might want to optimize your 4770k instead of trying to boost it with dual Xeons. - Someone who previously ran dual Xeon E5-2670 processors.
Z
Zed_Zip_
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #4

Most games favor strong single-core performance rather than many threads. You might want to optimize your 4770k instead of trying to boost it with dual Xeons. - Someone who previously ran dual Xeon E5-2670 processors.

K
KillerPuppet
Junior Member
8
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#5
Gaming dual sockets won't significantly reduce core-to-core latency. Extra cores likely won't help much, particularly with xeons that typically operate at lower clock speeds.
K
KillerPuppet
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #5

Gaming dual sockets won't significantly reduce core-to-core latency. Extra cores likely won't help much, particularly with xeons that typically operate at lower clock speeds.

H
husker53
Posting Freak
802
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#6
Thanks all for the responses. I'll go with my 4770K.
H
husker53
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #6

Thanks all for the responses. I'll go with my 4770K.

S
seigneurZOZ
Member
126
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#7
It's not about whether you can play games anymore. Xeon processors are designed for workstations and servers, usually with more cores but slower speeds. For gaming, core count isn't the main factor—clock speed does matter more. Even in 2021, a six-core setup is usually sufficient. The 4770K’s maximum clock speed is around 3.5 GHz, while I’m not sure about your cooling setup. It should be possible to keep it stable at 4–4.2 GHz for gaming, which might account for the small performance drop you noticed.
S
seigneurZOZ
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #7

It's not about whether you can play games anymore. Xeon processors are designed for workstations and servers, usually with more cores but slower speeds. For gaming, core count isn't the main factor—clock speed does matter more. Even in 2021, a six-core setup is usually sufficient. The 4770K’s maximum clock speed is around 3.5 GHz, while I’m not sure about your cooling setup. It should be possible to keep it stable at 4–4.2 GHz for gaming, which might account for the small performance drop you noticed.

N
nickernoose
Member
56
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#8
Changes are beginning to take shape. Asobo recently showcased an updated MSFS2020 patch arriving soon, designed to leverage multithreaded CPU capabilities more effectively. Several studios have also implemented significant adjustments to optimize performance on systems with many cores—such as Unreal Engine 5, Frostbite, and Unity. DX12U has made a few refinements to support these improvements. However, realizing these benefits still requires dedicated development work from developers, meaning widespread adoption won’t happen immediately. In the end, your insight is accurate: games will gain more from strong single-core speed than from having many cores.
N
nickernoose
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #8

Changes are beginning to take shape. Asobo recently showcased an updated MSFS2020 patch arriving soon, designed to leverage multithreaded CPU capabilities more effectively. Several studios have also implemented significant adjustments to optimize performance on systems with many cores—such as Unreal Engine 5, Frostbite, and Unity. DX12U has made a few refinements to support these improvements. However, realizing these benefits still requires dedicated development work from developers, meaning widespread adoption won’t happen immediately. In the end, your insight is accurate: games will gain more from strong single-core speed than from having many cores.

S
Sierra_Bear
Junior Member
8
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM
#9
Linus demonstrated in the Skulltrail how newer engines such as Vulcan work well with multiple cores, enabling better performance on older dual-socket setups. However, in most games, the weak single-core speed still poses a problem.
S
Sierra_Bear
06-23-2016, 06:42 AM #9

Linus demonstrated in the Skulltrail how newer engines such as Vulcan work well with multiple cores, enabling better performance on older dual-socket setups. However, in most games, the weak single-core speed still poses a problem.