F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks PiHole vs Adguard Home

PiHole vs Adguard Home

PiHole vs Adguard Home

I
isaac17gamer
Member
73
06-01-2024, 03:25 AM
#1
Hello all, Historically I've used my Rasp Pi 5 as my firewall running Pi Hole. I recently bought a new WiFi 7 router that includes built-in Adguard Home support, and was trying to compare the two but couldn't find any recent reviews of both. I was wondering if anyone had used both or could link to a good recent comparison article. My main concern is that while Adguard Home is currently free, that could change and I already have the Rasp Pi set-up with PiHole, so there's no additional cost via either route.
I
isaac17gamer
06-01-2024, 03:25 AM #1

Hello all, Historically I've used my Rasp Pi 5 as my firewall running Pi Hole. I recently bought a new WiFi 7 router that includes built-in Adguard Home support, and was trying to compare the two but couldn't find any recent reviews of both. I was wondering if anyone had used both or could link to a good recent comparison article. My main concern is that while Adguard Home is currently free, that could change and I already have the Rasp Pi set-up with PiHole, so there's no additional cost via either route.

B
BlazedScar
Member
156
06-08-2024, 08:45 AM
#2
The differences in experience between these options are minimal. Most users favor one interface over the other, with little variation in overall feel. Consistent performance and comparable features make it hard to pinpoint a clear advantage. It’s possible either side could eventually need licensing, just like Pi-Hole.
B
BlazedScar
06-08-2024, 08:45 AM #2

The differences in experience between these options are minimal. Most users favor one interface over the other, with little variation in overall feel. Consistent performance and comparable features make it hard to pinpoint a clear advantage. It’s possible either side could eventually need licensing, just like Pi-Hole.

T
ToonCat
Junior Member
7
06-09-2024, 11:30 PM
#3
The main factor making PiHole more likely to stay free than Adguard is its open-source nature, allowing me to use the latest version while Adguard Home relies on a company. I've experienced several instances where products were taken offline, so I've been shifting toward open-source alternatives.
T
ToonCat
06-09-2024, 11:30 PM #3

The main factor making PiHole more likely to stay free than Adguard is its open-source nature, allowing me to use the latest version while Adguard Home relies on a company. I've experienced several instances where products were taken offline, so I've been shifting toward open-source alternatives.

J
JCstyles357
Junior Member
47
07-01-2024, 08:54 PM
#4
When it doesn’t cause discomfort, maintain the pihole and turn off AdGuard. As mentioned, the setup afterward feels almost the same.
J
JCstyles357
07-01-2024, 08:54 PM #4

When it doesn’t cause discomfort, maintain the pihole and turn off AdGuard. As mentioned, the setup afterward feels almost the same.

L
lannijl
Member
64
07-16-2024, 05:46 PM
#5
Adguard Home is available under the open source license, accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome. It seems somewhat contradictory since the company operates as a for-profit entity, yet their browser extension, DNS server, and AdGuard Home are openly shared. Other adblock solutions are not covered in their own documentation, which they reference here: https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-open...olicy.html. We think that when an application is free and prioritizes user privacy, such projects should be transparent—this app must remain open source.
L
lannijl
07-16-2024, 05:46 PM #5

Adguard Home is available under the open source license, accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome. It seems somewhat contradictory since the company operates as a for-profit entity, yet their browser extension, DNS server, and AdGuard Home are openly shared. Other adblock solutions are not covered in their own documentation, which they reference here: https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-open...olicy.html. We think that when an application is free and prioritizes user privacy, such projects should be transparent—this app must remain open source.

I
iHashASF
Member
229
07-19-2024, 02:40 AM
#6
Confirming your understanding… you meant the firewall, not Pihole. It’s not a firewall at all—it’s a DNS service. You can also use it for DHCP, but it’s clearly not a security device.
I
iHashASF
07-19-2024, 02:40 AM #6

Confirming your understanding… you meant the firewall, not Pihole. It’s not a firewall at all—it’s a DNS service. You can also use it for DHCP, but it’s clearly not a security device.

L
Lucky5955
Junior Member
26
07-19-2024, 06:35 AM
#7
I forgot to reply earlier! Actually, I understand now. My router manages DHCP reservations and the Pi-Hole takes care of DNS. It functions like part of the "firewall" by controlling which queries are permitted, though it doesn’t enforce blocking directly.
L
Lucky5955
07-19-2024, 06:35 AM #7

I forgot to reply earlier! Actually, I understand now. My router manages DHCP reservations and the Pi-Hole takes care of DNS. It functions like part of the "firewall" by controlling which queries are permitted, though it doesn’t enforce blocking directly.