F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Performance is extremely poor on Cinebench R23.

Performance is extremely poor on Cinebench R23.

Performance is extremely poor on Cinebench R23.

T
Tsaritsa
Member
Find
59
07-13-2020, 10:29 AM
#1
I'm facing issues with my 5950x. Most users achieve high scores in Cinebench (around 650), but mine is much lower—about 560. After upgrading to R23, I optimized RAM and latency, but still managed only 1563 on a single core (reported 1650s). Multi-core performance is decent but not impressive, especially compared to scores over 3000. I've experimented with various settings and OC configurations without breaking through the 30k mark. The cooling and motherboard seem fine, but results vary depending on core usage. Any suggestions? Thanks!
Reply
Reply
T
Tsaritsa
07-13-2020, 10:29 AM #1

I'm facing issues with my 5950x. Most users achieve high scores in Cinebench (around 650), but mine is much lower—about 560. After upgrading to R23, I optimized RAM and latency, but still managed only 1563 on a single core (reported 1650s). Multi-core performance is decent but not impressive, especially compared to scores over 3000. I've experimented with various settings and OC configurations without breaking through the 30k mark. The cooling and motherboard seem fine, but results vary depending on core usage. Any suggestions? Thanks!

Reply
Reply
S
Shedi
Junior Member
Find
45
07-15-2020, 10:01 AM
#2
The reported latency is 61 ns, but your Cl14 3200 shows 8.75 ns. That’s a difference of about 2.9 ns.
Reply
Reply
S
Shedi
07-15-2020, 10:01 AM #2

The reported latency is 61 ns, but your Cl14 3200 shows 8.75 ns. That’s a difference of about 2.9 ns.

Reply
Reply
J
jpenney7
Member
Find
168
07-15-2020, 11:30 AM
#3
Currently it's around 63.8ns according to AIDA64. If we don't boost the Infinity Fabric speed to match the RAM, I'd expect 75-78ns.
Reply
Reply
J
jpenney7
07-15-2020, 11:30 AM #3

Currently it's around 63.8ns according to AIDA64. If we don't boost the Infinity Fabric speed to match the RAM, I'd expect 75-78ns.

Reply
Reply
M
mg012000
Member
Find
51
07-16-2020, 11:10 AM
#4
That's... a bit intense. I'm trying to stay within reasonable limits.
Reply
Reply
M
mg012000
07-16-2020, 11:10 AM #4

That's... a bit intense. I'm trying to stay within reasonable limits.

Reply
Reply
M
mayan12345
Member
Find
207
07-19-2020, 12:03 AM
#5
Watched a creator's video where they updated their 3000MHz memory for the same brand; anything under 70 performed well, and their delivery was clear. In CPU-Z, I saw a score of 659.7 for single and 12535.5 for multi, which is solid on both metrics, though I’m unsure if it reflects the original or modified build.
Reply
Reply
M
mayan12345
07-19-2020, 12:03 AM #5

Watched a creator's video where they updated their 3000MHz memory for the same brand; anything under 70 performed well, and their delivery was clear. In CPU-Z, I saw a score of 659.7 for single and 12535.5 for multi, which is solid on both metrics, though I’m unsure if it reflects the original or modified build.

Reply
Reply