F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking the i7-5820k

Overclocking the i7-5820k

Overclocking the i7-5820k

S
StarKillerSTF
Member
125
08-16-2016, 02:10 AM
#1
I constructed a computer a few months back using an i7-5820k chip. I boosted it to 4.5 GHz at 1.3v, but stability under heavy use was inconsistent. I reduced it to 4.2 GHz and it performs much better, though the maximum temperature with my liquid cooler stays at 60°C. I’m wondering if adding more voltage is safe, since the cooler can handle a lot. Also, my DDR4 3000 RAM struggles above 2133 MHz, even though I sometimes use 2666. What’s the best stable overclock setting? Thanks for your guidance!
S
StarKillerSTF
08-16-2016, 02:10 AM #1

I constructed a computer a few months back using an i7-5820k chip. I boosted it to 4.5 GHz at 1.3v, but stability under heavy use was inconsistent. I reduced it to 4.2 GHz and it performs much better, though the maximum temperature with my liquid cooler stays at 60°C. I’m wondering if adding more voltage is safe, since the cooler can handle a lot. Also, my DDR4 3000 RAM struggles above 2133 MHz, even though I sometimes use 2666. What’s the best stable overclock setting? Thanks for your guidance!

H
HumbleHawk
Junior Member
31
08-23-2016, 03:41 AM
#2
1.3v typically delivers 4.5ghz in about 90% of cases.
Before increasing voltage further, verify your RAM stability using memtest86.
Check your cache clock or ring ratio—aim for x35 or x40, avoid higher settings.
Setting it to auto or above 40 may lead to instability.
For extra power beyond 1.3v, you can reach up to 1.4v, but temperatures should stay under 80°C.
I’m confident you can achieve 1.3 at 4.5ghz with some adjustments.
H
HumbleHawk
08-23-2016, 03:41 AM #2

1.3v typically delivers 4.5ghz in about 90% of cases.
Before increasing voltage further, verify your RAM stability using memtest86.
Check your cache clock or ring ratio—aim for x35 or x40, avoid higher settings.
Setting it to auto or above 40 may lead to instability.
For extra power beyond 1.3v, you can reach up to 1.4v, but temperatures should stay under 80°C.
I’m confident you can achieve 1.3 at 4.5ghz with some adjustments.

_
_ItsNiels_
Junior Member
4
08-23-2016, 10:11 AM
#3
1.3v typically delivers 4.5ghz in about 90% of cases.
Before increasing voltage further, verify your RAM stability using memtest86.
Check your cache clock or ring ratio—aim for x35 or x40, avoid higher settings.
Setting it to auto or above 40 may lead to instability.
For extra power beyond 1.3v, you can reach up to 1.4v, but temperatures should stay under 80°C.
I’m confident you can achieve 1.3 at 4.5ghz with some adjustments.
_
_ItsNiels_
08-23-2016, 10:11 AM #3

1.3v typically delivers 4.5ghz in about 90% of cases.
Before increasing voltage further, verify your RAM stability using memtest86.
Check your cache clock or ring ratio—aim for x35 or x40, avoid higher settings.
Setting it to auto or above 40 may lead to instability.
For extra power beyond 1.3v, you can reach up to 1.4v, but temperatures should stay under 80°C.
I’m confident you can achieve 1.3 at 4.5ghz with some adjustments.

G
Gariel_Ezmo
Junior Member
7
09-06-2016, 08:41 PM
#4
I will also state clearly that I would never personally exceed 1.35v (I have never gone beyond 1.32). If you can achieve 4.5 at those levels, I believe it isn't worth it and you should settle for the lower setting. It remains extremely fast.
G
Gariel_Ezmo
09-06-2016, 08:41 PM #4

I will also state clearly that I would never personally exceed 1.35v (I have never gone beyond 1.32). If you can achieve 4.5 at those levels, I believe it isn't worth it and you should settle for the lower setting. It remains extremely fast.

B
blackben123
Member
57
09-08-2016, 04:52 AM
#5
I need to verify my cache clock to determine its current value. I plan to maintain a lower clock setting, but so far no problems have arisen.
B
blackben123
09-08-2016, 04:52 AM #5

I need to verify my cache clock to determine its current value. I plan to maintain a lower clock setting, but so far no problems have arisen.

K
Knniff
Junior Member
13
09-19-2016, 01:43 PM
#6
There isn't a significant real-world benefit to using a cache or ring clock faster than 4ghz (or around 3.5ghz, which is a bit of a stretch). Some individuals prefer keeping it synchronized with the core clock in a 1:1 ratio, but this isn't essential and demands precise adjustments along with higher voltage. They do all of this without any actual performance gain.
K
Knniff
09-19-2016, 01:43 PM #6

There isn't a significant real-world benefit to using a cache or ring clock faster than 4ghz (or around 3.5ghz, which is a bit of a stretch). Some individuals prefer keeping it synchronized with the core clock in a 1:1 ratio, but this isn't essential and demands precise adjustments along with higher voltage. They do all of this without any actual performance gain.