F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking overclocking question i5 4690k

overclocking question i5 4690k

overclocking question i5 4690k

S
ShyCarrot
Member
83
07-16-2016, 10:52 PM
#1
I increased my i5 4690k to 4.6ghz at 1.276 volts on an asus maximus vii hero board with a corsair h100i v2 cooler. Temperatures are holding steady near 27c idle and about 47 under load. Should I try pushing it further?
S
ShyCarrot
07-16-2016, 10:52 PM #1

I increased my i5 4690k to 4.6ghz at 1.276 volts on an asus maximus vii hero board with a corsair h100i v2 cooler. Temperatures are holding steady near 27c idle and about 47 under load. Should I try pushing it further?

K
kirbyse
Junior Member
9
07-31-2016, 06:54 AM
#2
Packersfan036 shared their thoughts on the situation, noting the low ambient temperatures and the feasibility of reaching higher clock speeds. They mentioned the potential for 1.32v and a 4.7ghz performance, expressing surprise at the low temperatures achieved. The discussion also touched on stress testing results and the importance of staying under 80C during intensive tests.
K
kirbyse
07-31-2016, 06:54 AM #2

Packersfan036 shared their thoughts on the situation, noting the low ambient temperatures and the feasibility of reaching higher clock speeds. They mentioned the potential for 1.32v and a 4.7ghz performance, expressing surprise at the low temperatures achieved. The discussion also touched on stress testing results and the importance of staying under 80C during intensive tests.

X
XavierPlaysMC
Junior Member
30
08-02-2016, 04:07 AM
#3
Wow, those ambient temperatures seem really low for a 47C load.
You can definitely push it to 1.32v for Haswell, and 4.7ghz should be doable.
X
XavierPlaysMC
08-02-2016, 04:07 AM #3

Wow, those ambient temperatures seem really low for a 47C load.
You can definitely push it to 1.32v for Haswell, and 4.7ghz should be doable.

R
RayMage
Junior Member
16
08-18-2016, 10:32 PM
#4
TechyInAZ shared their thoughts on the situation, noting the surprisingly low ambient temperatures for such a high load. They mentioned being able to reach 1.32v for Haswell and believe 4.7ghz is achievable. They expressed surprise at their own performance and questioned whether they would need 1.32v to hit 4.7ghz, referencing a stress test where temperatures peaked at 55c under heavy use.
R
RayMage
08-18-2016, 10:32 PM #4

TechyInAZ shared their thoughts on the situation, noting the surprisingly low ambient temperatures for such a high load. They mentioned being able to reach 1.32v for Haswell and believe 4.7ghz is achievable. They expressed surprise at their own performance and questioned whether they would need 1.32v to hit 4.7ghz, referencing a stress test where temperatures peaked at 55c under heavy use.

T
209
08-18-2016, 10:42 PM
#5
Packersfan036 shared their thoughts on the situation, noting the low ambient temperatures and confirming the feasibility of reaching high voltages for performance gains. They mentioned being surprised by the low temperatures and questioned whether a 1.32v setting would be necessary to hit 4.7ghz. The original poster responded positively, acknowledging the good CPU and discussing stress testing results, suggesting it's possible to maintain under 80C with intensive tests.
T
timidgecko1134
08-18-2016, 10:42 PM #5

Packersfan036 shared their thoughts on the situation, noting the low ambient temperatures and confirming the feasibility of reaching high voltages for performance gains. They mentioned being surprised by the low temperatures and questioned whether a 1.32v setting would be necessary to hit 4.7ghz. The original poster responded positively, acknowledging the good CPU and discussing stress testing results, suggesting it's possible to maintain under 80C with intensive tests.

D
DieEneDionYT
Junior Member
19
08-19-2016, 06:53 AM
#6
TechInAZ shared their thoughts on the situation. They noted the ambient temperatures seem unusually low for a 47C load and mentioned they could reach 1.32v for Haswell, estimating a 4.7ghz performance. They were surprised by the low temperatures and questioned whether a 1.32v setting would be necessary to hit 4.7ghz. They also referenced a stress test using Intel Extreme Tuning Utility, which showed temps rising to 55C under heavy load. TechInAZ concluded it was good either way and suggested keeping the voltage stable, advising to monitor results before deciding on overclocking.
D
DieEneDionYT
08-19-2016, 06:53 AM #6

TechInAZ shared their thoughts on the situation. They noted the ambient temperatures seem unusually low for a 47C load and mentioned they could reach 1.32v for Haswell, estimating a 4.7ghz performance. They were surprised by the low temperatures and questioned whether a 1.32v setting would be necessary to hit 4.7ghz. They also referenced a stress test using Intel Extreme Tuning Utility, which showed temps rising to 55C under heavy load. TechInAZ concluded it was good either way and suggested keeping the voltage stable, advising to monitor results before deciding on overclocking.

E
EmissaryZ
Member
112
08-19-2016, 03:37 PM
#7
Great, just creep up on the voltage when necessary.
E
EmissaryZ
08-19-2016, 03:37 PM #7

Great, just creep up on the voltage when necessary.

S
Sheriff_Gabers
Junior Member
13
08-27-2016, 03:32 PM
#8
Great, just come in close when necessary.
Cool, thanks.
S
Sheriff_Gabers
08-27-2016, 03:32 PM #8

Great, just come in close when necessary.
Cool, thanks.