F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking noob tips - advice on voltage

Overclocking noob tips - advice on voltage

Overclocking noob tips - advice on voltage

T
Typogif
Junior Member
31
04-29-2022, 01:10 AM
#1
Hey, guys. Here’s what you should consider for your overclocking situation.
T
Typogif
04-29-2022, 01:10 AM #1

Hey, guys. Here’s what you should consider for your overclocking situation.

G
Gulasch99
Junior Member
18
04-29-2022, 07:20 PM
#2
I wouldn't reduce the voltage to 1.265 (or slightly higher) since it remains stable at 1.3V; you might consider raising the frequency instead, as temperature changes are mainly linked to voltage. Aim for a temperature below your comfort level—keep it under 80—to ensure your overclock stays within acceptable limits. Your current setting is fine as it stands. You could attempt 4.6GHz if you're lucky, but it appears your chip isn't among the top performers, as some operate at 4.5GHz without increasing voltage. I suggest trying 4.6GHz up to 1.35V if you're comfortable with that range, and monitor temperatures; if needed, revert to 4.5GHz and 1.3V.
G
Gulasch99
04-29-2022, 07:20 PM #2

I wouldn't reduce the voltage to 1.265 (or slightly higher) since it remains stable at 1.3V; you might consider raising the frequency instead, as temperature changes are mainly linked to voltage. Aim for a temperature below your comfort level—keep it under 80—to ensure your overclock stays within acceptable limits. Your current setting is fine as it stands. You could attempt 4.6GHz if you're lucky, but it appears your chip isn't among the top performers, as some operate at 4.5GHz without increasing voltage. I suggest trying 4.6GHz up to 1.35V if you're comfortable with that range, and monitor temperatures; if needed, revert to 4.5GHz and 1.3V.

M
Murilim
Junior Member
1
04-29-2022, 09:20 PM
#3
I wouldn't reduce the voltage to 1.265 (or slightly higher) since it remains stable at 1.3V; you might consider raising the frequency instead, as temperature changes are mainly linked to voltage. Aim for a temperature below your comfort level—keep it under 80—to ensure your overclock stays within acceptable limits. It would be safe to try reaching 4.6GHz if you're fortunate, but it appears your chip isn't among the top performers, as some can reach 4.5GHz without increasing voltage. I suggest testing 4.6GHz up to 1.35V and monitoring temperatures; if that feels too high, revert to 4.5GHz at 1.3V.
M
Murilim
04-29-2022, 09:20 PM #3

I wouldn't reduce the voltage to 1.265 (or slightly higher) since it remains stable at 1.3V; you might consider raising the frequency instead, as temperature changes are mainly linked to voltage. Aim for a temperature below your comfort level—keep it under 80—to ensure your overclock stays within acceptable limits. It would be safe to try reaching 4.6GHz if you're fortunate, but it appears your chip isn't among the top performers, as some can reach 4.5GHz without increasing voltage. I suggest testing 4.6GHz up to 1.35V and monitoring temperatures; if that feels too high, revert to 4.5GHz at 1.3V.

A
Alsacecoser
Junior Member
44
04-30-2022, 03:34 AM
#4
I'm planning to try 4.6GHz at some point, though I'm satisfied with 4.5GHz using the 1.3V configuration if that works. I just wanted to confirm I was checking the CPU performance properly. Intel Burn Test runs quicker than Prime95, but I'm not sure if they match in effectiveness.
A
Alsacecoser
04-30-2022, 03:34 AM #4

I'm planning to try 4.6GHz at some point, though I'm satisfied with 4.5GHz using the 1.3V configuration if that works. I just wanted to confirm I was checking the CPU performance properly. Intel Burn Test runs quicker than Prime95, but I'm not sure if they match in effectiveness.

C
109
05-01-2022, 12:05 AM
#5
I'm planning to test the 4.6GHz model eventually, but I'm satisfied with the 4.5GHz setup using the 1.3V configuration if that's acceptable. I just wanted to confirm I was evaluating the CPU properly. Intel Burn Test runs quicker than Prime95, though I'm not sure if their results match or are equally reliable. They should perform quite similarly, except for newer P95 versions which might cause overheating and crashes under heavy use. If you're content with your current setup, it's fine—stability is the best.
C
CapnCrunchz559
05-01-2022, 12:05 AM #5

I'm planning to test the 4.6GHz model eventually, but I'm satisfied with the 4.5GHz setup using the 1.3V configuration if that's acceptable. I just wanted to confirm I was evaluating the CPU properly. Intel Burn Test runs quicker than Prime95, though I'm not sure if their results match or are equally reliable. They should perform quite similarly, except for newer P95 versions which might cause overheating and crashes under heavy use. If you're content with your current setup, it's fine—stability is the best.

A
Aribz
Junior Member
5
05-01-2022, 01:50 AM
#6
Fine adjustment: observe the voltage reduction when the CPU is suddenly under stress. This phenomenon is referred to as "Vdroop" if I recall right. Reducing it could allow for a lower core voltage. Are you utilizing any voltage stabilization or load compensation options on the motherboard?
A
Aribz
05-01-2022, 01:50 AM #6

Fine adjustment: observe the voltage reduction when the CPU is suddenly under stress. This phenomenon is referred to as "Vdroop" if I recall right. Reducing it could allow for a lower core voltage. Are you utilizing any voltage stabilization or load compensation options on the motherboard?