F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking overclocking gtx 1050

overclocking gtx 1050

overclocking gtx 1050

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
A
ArchangelZ21
Member
209
05-07-2016, 05:52 PM
#1
I have a GTX 1050 Gigabyte WindForce Edition. I'm checking if these settings are safe since the card uses only the PCIe slot and has those clock speeds. If there are better configurations available, let me know.
A
ArchangelZ21
05-07-2016, 05:52 PM #1

I have a GTX 1050 Gigabyte WindForce Edition. I'm checking if these settings are safe since the card uses only the PCIe slot and has those clock speeds. If there are better configurations available, let me know.

J
JadenOfficial
Member
63
05-09-2016, 10:19 AM
#2
You have the option to increase them as much as desired without causing damage. The settings will stay within the limits set by the GPU's vbios. In short, you can't destroy the card unless you bypass the bios or expose it to liquid.
J
JadenOfficial
05-09-2016, 10:19 AM #2

You have the option to increase them as much as desired without causing damage. The settings will stay within the limits set by the GPU's vbios. In short, you can't destroy the card unless you bypass the bios or expose it to liquid.

E
ExoPlus
Junior Member
9
05-09-2016, 06:28 PM
#3
Is it safe? Each card is unique.
Try it yourself or avoid overclocking.
E
ExoPlus
05-09-2016, 06:28 PM #3

Is it safe? Each card is unique.
Try it yourself or avoid overclocking.

G
galexygamer3
Member
178
05-10-2016, 12:00 PM
#4
Sure, let's clarify this a bit more, rgd1101.
It’s not really about a single “safe” setting, because there are so many factors to consider. It’s like asking if driving at 120 km/h on a road that’s only 90 km/h is safe—probably yes, but there are still risks involved.
You should test and determine what your safe limits are, especially when temperatures are high (over 75-80°C) and you want to avoid any crashes in your system.
G
galexygamer3
05-10-2016, 12:00 PM #4

Sure, let's clarify this a bit more, rgd1101.
It’s not really about a single “safe” setting, because there are so many factors to consider. It’s like asking if driving at 120 km/h on a road that’s only 90 km/h is safe—probably yes, but there are still risks involved.
You should test and determine what your safe limits are, especially when temperatures are high (over 75-80°C) and you want to avoid any crashes in your system.

M
Mr_Budder1982
Junior Member
3
05-10-2016, 04:28 PM
#5
+200 core clock is definitely not stable.
10 and 20 series cards should all be capable of +100 core. Past that, there's very little headroom.
The memory clock is what you can crank up, but did you work your way up to +800? That seems a little high.
Test with:
Msi Kombustor: if it finds errors/artifacts, turn the memory clock down. The longer you test for, the better.
Unigine Heaven: if you notice artifacts, turn the clock down. The longer the test, the better.
Asus Realbench: 8hr stress test run. It'll stop if it finds errors.
M
Mr_Budder1982
05-10-2016, 04:28 PM #5

+200 core clock is definitely not stable.
10 and 20 series cards should all be capable of +100 core. Past that, there's very little headroom.
The memory clock is what you can crank up, but did you work your way up to +800? That seems a little high.
Test with:
Msi Kombustor: if it finds errors/artifacts, turn the memory clock down. The longer you test for, the better.
Unigine Heaven: if you notice artifacts, turn the clock down. The longer the test, the better.
Asus Realbench: 8hr stress test run. It'll stop if it finds errors.

D
DangoBravo
Posting Freak
821
05-15-2016, 01:36 AM
#6
i noticed someone boosting their graphics card to 175 and 500 MHz, and the benchmarks looked great. their channel is nj tech.
D
DangoBravo
05-15-2016, 01:36 AM #6

i noticed someone boosting their graphics card to 175 and 500 MHz, and the benchmarks looked great. their channel is nj tech.

J
JaynKay
Member
233
05-17-2016, 11:48 AM
#7
Silicon quality differs between cards. One might handle +175, another 150, while some struggle beyond 105. This is why testing each card is essential—don’t just use someone else’s settings.
J
JaynKay
05-17-2016, 11:48 AM #7

Silicon quality differs between cards. One might handle +175, another 150, while some struggle beyond 105. This is why testing each card is essential—don’t just use someone else’s settings.

D
DavePlaysYT
Member
224
05-20-2016, 06:57 PM
#8
you should determine the optimal settings by testing with 40+ increments and checking if it works, then repeating the process.
D
DavePlaysYT
05-20-2016, 06:57 PM #8

you should determine the optimal settings by testing with 40+ increments and checking if it works, then repeating the process.

O
ofeliant
Member
174
05-22-2016, 06:56 AM
#9
Yep.
I attempted using an MSI's OC Scanner tool, but discovered it was too forceful with core clock overrides. My card doesn't appear to accept core clocks above 110, yet the program continued to display numbers like 130s, 140s—even 164—and consistently gave a '90%' confidence rating until I actually ran some tests... Memory OC seems to be what these graphics cards prefer, so it wasn't a major issue for me.
O
ofeliant
05-22-2016, 06:56 AM #9

Yep.
I attempted using an MSI's OC Scanner tool, but discovered it was too forceful with core clock overrides. My card doesn't appear to accept core clocks above 110, yet the program continued to display numbers like 130s, 140s—even 164—and consistently gave a '90%' confidence rating until I actually ran some tests... Memory OC seems to be what these graphics cards prefer, so it wasn't a major issue for me.

E
EmmaX06
Junior Member
1
05-24-2016, 01:13 AM
#10
Make sure the power limit is set to maximum in MSPI afterburner, or else your card will only draw from PCIe (75W only).
E
EmmaX06
05-24-2016, 01:13 AM #10

Make sure the power limit is set to maximum in MSPI afterburner, or else your card will only draw from PCIe (75W only).

Pages (2): 1 2 Next