F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking Fx 8370

Overclocking Fx 8370

Overclocking Fx 8370

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
217
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#1
Sorry if I messed up the setup.

Here are the details:
The specs I have are: Fxa 990 Gaming, MSI, FX 8370, CX 750M Corsair, EVGA 970 SSC, H100 V2 Corsair.

It seems to work fairly well for about two days. The bus voltage is 220, and the CPU multiplier is set to x22.0 (which equates to 7 - 22.5) at 4.85GHz. Do CPU-z have a screenshot?

The voltage from the CPU to +1.8, CPU to NB is +0.01, and NB is +0.44. I think that’s what most people end up with when they get it right.

I tested it under maximum load (95%), and it handled 45°C. On Intel burn, it was 40°C; on Prime 95, it failed around 2 minutes, then dropped to a lower temperature afterward. I managed about 4 runs at 4.85GHz without any crashes or instability.

I’m unsure if this is the best setting, but it seems stable enough. I’d prefer keeping it at 4.85GHz, though I’m not sure of my limits. I’ve checked several forums, but I’m still a bit unsure, especially with my PSU.
L
lol_Angela_lol
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #1

Sorry if I messed up the setup.

Here are the details:
The specs I have are: Fxa 990 Gaming, MSI, FX 8370, CX 750M Corsair, EVGA 970 SSC, H100 V2 Corsair.

It seems to work fairly well for about two days. The bus voltage is 220, and the CPU multiplier is set to x22.0 (which equates to 7 - 22.5) at 4.85GHz. Do CPU-z have a screenshot?

The voltage from the CPU to +1.8, CPU to NB is +0.01, and NB is +0.44. I think that’s what most people end up with when they get it right.

I tested it under maximum load (95%), and it handled 45°C. On Intel burn, it was 40°C; on Prime 95, it failed around 2 minutes, then dropped to a lower temperature afterward. I managed about 4 runs at 4.85GHz without any crashes or instability.

I’m unsure if this is the best setting, but it seems stable enough. I’d prefer keeping it at 4.85GHz, though I’m not sure of my limits. I’ve checked several forums, but I’m still a bit unsure, especially with my PSU.

J
jambalaia93
Member
224
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#2
Voltage CPU to +1.8 ??
If that's accurate, it's extremely risky.
I'm also surprised these full load temperatures seem correct.
Maybe try using the Windows Snip Tool to capture a snapshot.
J
jambalaia93
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #2

Voltage CPU to +1.8 ??
If that's accurate, it's extremely risky.
I'm also surprised these full load temperatures seem correct.
Maybe try using the Windows Snip Tool to capture a snapshot.

R
Runnergirl15
Member
246
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#3
Sorry, I have a picture of it.
CPU Voltage is at +0.18, CPU-NB at +0.01, NB at +1.44.
That's what HWiNFO64 reported, and I just shared the Max Temperatures.
Also, sorry if my posts seem a bit sloppy.
R
Runnergirl15
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #3

Sorry, I have a picture of it.
CPU Voltage is at +0.18, CPU-NB at +0.01, NB at +1.44.
That's what HWiNFO64 reported, and I just shared the Max Temperatures.
Also, sorry if my posts seem a bit sloppy.

P
papercut3
Member
221
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#4
I am uncertain about the request.
Regarding the overclock, if it remains stable and temperatures and voltages stay within limits, there is no cause for concern. I recommend keeping it unchanged.
Similar to high CPU usage, the FX83xx series are solid processors but not extremely fast—consider sticking with Intel Core i5 performance at most. Unless the CPU is limiting your speed or creating problems, continue using it. This accounts for the 80% load.
Concerning the power supply, I believe you are not exceeding 450 watts, which should be fine with your current unit. If you plan to use SLI or increase power demands, upgrading would be advisable if possible within your budget.
P
papercut3
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #4

I am uncertain about the request.
Regarding the overclock, if it remains stable and temperatures and voltages stay within limits, there is no cause for concern. I recommend keeping it unchanged.
Similar to high CPU usage, the FX83xx series are solid processors but not extremely fast—consider sticking with Intel Core i5 performance at most. Unless the CPU is limiting your speed or creating problems, continue using it. This accounts for the 80% load.
Concerning the power supply, I believe you are not exceeding 450 watts, which should be fine with your current unit. If you plan to use SLI or increase power demands, upgrading would be advisable if possible within your budget.

T
TheDJKat
Member
55
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#5
Well Honestly, I was more worried about the Mobo I really don’t know what it can handle. I’ve read people using different voltages and temperature limits. I actually like the 8370—it used to have an 8350, but some motherboard defects fried it, lol. I just wish someone would come up with a better architecture and new processor line.

Another good question would be whether I should try increasing the voltage a bit more to see if it becomes stable enough for Intel burn or Prime95 to run smoothly. Since you think it might be safe, maybe I could keep doing small adjustments or just leave it as is?
T
TheDJKat
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #5

Well Honestly, I was more worried about the Mobo I really don’t know what it can handle. I’ve read people using different voltages and temperature limits. I actually like the 8370—it used to have an 8350, but some motherboard defects fried it, lol. I just wish someone would come up with a better architecture and new processor line.

Another good question would be whether I should try increasing the voltage a bit more to see if it becomes stable enough for Intel burn or Prime95 to run smoothly. Since you think it might be safe, maybe I could keep doing small adjustments or just leave it as is?

G
Gustavgurra03
Posting Freak
815
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#6
they are proceeding with the work, zen is expected around late February/early March.
your auxiliary temperatures are elevated, assuming that's the average.
i understand 990 boards are set for the 90s temperature range but that remains higher than my preference.
what actual CPU voltage do you see in cpu-z and hwinfo during stress tests?
G
Gustavgurra03
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #6

they are proceeding with the work, zen is expected around late February/early March.
your auxiliary temperatures are elevated, assuming that's the average.
i understand 990 boards are set for the 90s temperature range but that remains higher than my preference.
what actual CPU voltage do you see in cpu-z and hwinfo during stress tests?

M
mccoop03
Posting Freak
910
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#7
Well I didn't want to hit 1.6V because I wasn't sure what the safe level was. It's still at 1.592V Max, isn't it? That's Zennis, right? I think they're not making any more unclocked for a while, which would be a disappointment. IBT lasted about 3 minutes, lol But at least my computer doesn't crash or freeze.
M
mccoop03
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #7

Well I didn't want to hit 1.6V because I wasn't sure what the safe level was. It's still at 1.592V Max, isn't it? That's Zennis, right? I think they're not making any more unclocked for a while, which would be a disappointment. IBT lasted about 3 minutes, lol But at least my computer doesn't crash or freeze.

L
lotan06
Junior Member
17
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#8
I got a shot of HWiNFO64
L
lotan06
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #8

I got a shot of HWiNFO64

A
Angel_MP
Member
174
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#9
MiauCloud shared his thoughts on the voltage limits. He mentioned he didn't want to exceed 1.6V because he wasn't sure about the safe level, noting it was still at 1.592V max. He thought it might be a new APU and wondered if more unclocked units would come soon, which would be disappointing. He recalled his board lasting about 3 minutes but appreciated that it didn’t crash or freeze. He suggested the safe point is around 1.55V, mentioning the board has a 6+2 phase design similar to the old 970 gaming model, though he admitted it wasn't perfect. He also shared that he would cap performance at 4.5-4.6ghz around 1.48V, noting some boards tend to fail or have memory controller issues when pushed too hard.
A
Angel_MP
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #9

MiauCloud shared his thoughts on the voltage limits. He mentioned he didn't want to exceed 1.6V because he wasn't sure about the safe level, noting it was still at 1.592V max. He thought it might be a new APU and wondered if more unclocked units would come soon, which would be disappointing. He recalled his board lasting about 3 minutes but appreciated that it didn’t crash or freeze. He suggested the safe point is around 1.55V, mentioning the board has a 6+2 phase design similar to the old 970 gaming model, though he admitted it wasn't perfect. He also shared that he would cap performance at 4.5-4.6ghz around 1.48V, noting some boards tend to fail or have memory controller issues when pushed too hard.

N
NinofanTOG
Member
211
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM
#10
Well if you think it's too much, I'll bring it back down.
I'm not sure what the real maximum is the board can handle, but I've read many forums and they seem a bit vague. I just lowered it to 1.5V—it stays stable at 1.4V on 4.6GHz, and then it drops back to around 1.38. I'll let you know what happens.
Also, this was running at full capacity for about 10 minutes. I restarted it accidentally near the end of that time, but those readings still look correct.
N
NinofanTOG
08-30-2024, 03:03 PM #10

Well if you think it's too much, I'll bring it back down.
I'm not sure what the real maximum is the board can handle, but I've read many forums and they seem a bit vague. I just lowered it to 1.5V—it stays stable at 1.4V on 4.6GHz, and then it drops back to around 1.38. I'll let you know what happens.
Also, this was running at full capacity for about 10 minutes. I restarted it accidentally near the end of that time, but those readings still look correct.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next