F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Overclocking a locked Dell motherboard using Windows

Overclocking a locked Dell motherboard using Windows

Overclocking a locked Dell motherboard using Windows

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
spammkys
Junior Member
7
03-24-2016, 07:36 PM
#1
I have a Dell OptiPlex 980 and plan to upgrade it with an RX400 or RX500 series card, aiming to overclock the i7 870. I understand the low chances of success in a locked BIOS, but I’m curious about using Windows’ "Intel Extreme Tuning Utility" for this purpose. I’d like to know the advantages and disadvantages, as well as the highest stable overclock speed before it crashes. Also, I don’t think a motherboard with an unlocked BIOS is worth it, since I’d prefer one that supports future upgrades. I’m mainly interested in whether my current Dell board is still usable for this project.
S
spammkys
03-24-2016, 07:36 PM #1

I have a Dell OptiPlex 980 and plan to upgrade it with an RX400 or RX500 series card, aiming to overclock the i7 870. I understand the low chances of success in a locked BIOS, but I’m curious about using Windows’ "Intel Extreme Tuning Utility" for this purpose. I’d like to know the advantages and disadvantages, as well as the highest stable overclock speed before it crashes. Also, I don’t think a motherboard with an unlocked BIOS is worth it, since I’d prefer one that supports future upgrades. I’m mainly interested in whether my current Dell board is still usable for this project.

C
carlobolla
Member
184
04-15-2016, 12:33 AM
#2
Cons
- Higher temperatures could surpass the capabilities of the restricted OEM coolers.
-Pros
- It seems to run slightly quicker, though the actual improvement is minimal.
C
carlobolla
04-15-2016, 12:33 AM #2

Cons
- Higher temperatures could surpass the capabilities of the restricted OEM coolers.
-Pros
- It seems to run slightly quicker, though the actual improvement is minimal.

K
KeetchuupBoy
Member
56
04-22-2016, 03:36 AM
#3
Cons
- Higher temperatures could surpass the capabilities of the restricted OEM coolers.
-Pros
- It seems to run slightly quicker, though the actual improvement is minimal.
K
KeetchuupBoy
04-22-2016, 03:36 AM #3

Cons
- Higher temperatures could surpass the capabilities of the restricted OEM coolers.
-Pros
- It seems to run slightly quicker, though the actual improvement is minimal.

A
AliMuhammed
Member
50
05-08-2016, 09:48 PM
#4
When the core voltage is fixed, further overclocking becomes impossible.
A
AliMuhammed
05-08-2016, 09:48 PM #4

When the core voltage is fixed, further overclocking becomes impossible.

T
233
05-23-2016, 11:20 PM
#5
If we consider the changes in numbers, we can determine the exact fps improvement from this level of overclocking.
T
TrainerGriffin
05-23-2016, 11:20 PM #5

If we consider the changes in numbers, we can determine the exact fps improvement from this level of overclocking.

I
ISY_0815
Senior Member
566
05-24-2016, 04:16 AM
#6
I don't know.
I
ISY_0815
05-24-2016, 04:16 AM #6

I don't know.

S
Sparxou__
Junior Member
33
06-02-2016, 06:48 AM
#7
.1 to .2 MHz corresponds to a maximum of 1 FPS and introduces overall system instability.
S
Sparxou__
06-02-2016, 06:48 AM #7

.1 to .2 MHz corresponds to a maximum of 1 FPS and introduces overall system instability.

N
Nienke_2002
Senior Member
621
06-02-2016, 08:35 AM
#8
I'd be surprised if you considered the higher FPS without still having fingers on your first hand. This isn't the kind of hardware you need to achieve what you're aiming for, whether it's the motherboard or CPU. Using the OEM cooler won't help much either, and with a lower-end Dell prebuilt PSU (like an AcBel instead of a Delta), you might not even have a suitable power supply.
N
Nienke_2002
06-02-2016, 08:35 AM #8

I'd be surprised if you considered the higher FPS without still having fingers on your first hand. This isn't the kind of hardware you need to achieve what you're aiming for, whether it's the motherboard or CPU. Using the OEM cooler won't help much either, and with a lower-end Dell prebuilt PSU (like an AcBel instead of a Delta), you might not even have a suitable power supply.

L
lapinette92
Member
50
06-02-2016, 09:41 AM
#9
It seems only around 100-300mhz will bring about about 2 frames per second, which means you'll need to push the CPUs further for real improvements. I already overclocked an i7 920 to 3.8ghz and noticed some good gains, though it was a significant overclock.
L
lapinette92
06-02-2016, 09:41 AM #9

It seems only around 100-300mhz will bring about about 2 frames per second, which means you'll need to push the CPUs further for real improvements. I already overclocked an i7 920 to 3.8ghz and noticed some good gains, though it was a significant overclock.

3
3Edge
Senior Member
718
06-05-2016, 04:14 PM
#10
You have the ability to handle a 600Mhz overclock.
Using SetFSB for OC is possible, but ensure your RAM is fast.
What are your PSU's 12V amperage ratings?
Monitor temperatures closely to keep them below 85°C.
I once overclocked an HP Q9550 Workstation from 2.8 to 3.4Ghz with SetFSB.
3
3Edge
06-05-2016, 04:14 PM #10

You have the ability to handle a 600Mhz overclock.
Using SetFSB for OC is possible, but ensure your RAM is fast.
What are your PSU's 12V amperage ratings?
Monitor temperatures closely to keep them below 85°C.
I once overclocked an HP Q9550 Workstation from 2.8 to 3.4Ghz with SetFSB.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next