Overclock testing parameter?
Overclock testing parameter?
Are these tests sufficient to confirm the stability of your CPU and memory?
Don't rely on other tests. Use Prime95 version 26.6 only, for 15 to 24 hours (preferably 24 hours) on Small FFT. This avoids errors in many systems between 15 and 24 hours, though after 24 hours issues are rare. Refer to the link provided.
You don't need any of those other tests. Prime95 version 26.6, and ONLY version 26.6, for 15-24 hours (24 hrs is better as I have seen many systems throw errors between 15 and 24 hrs but rarely after 24 hrs) on Small FFT.
http://windows-downloads-center.blogspot...5-266.html
15 minutes on Small FFT for thermal compliance verification. For memory, run Memtest86+ for 7 passes. That will take a LONG time to run, so be prepared. If you have not overclocked the memory past what it's XMP profile outlines, then you really don't NEED to test the memory, but it doesn't hurt either because there is always the slim chance of having a faulty stick.
If the Memtest is good for 3 passes, it's 90% likely that it's fine. 7 passes generally assures 99.9% reliability.
Darkbreeze :
Avoid the other tests. Use Prime95 version 26.6 only, for 15 to 24 hours – 24 hours is preferable since many systems report errors between 15 and 24 hours, though rarely after 24. Check Small FFT here: http://windows-downloads-center.blogspot...5-266.html
For thermal compliance, run Small FFT for 15 minutes. For memory, perform Memtest86+ with 7 passes. This process will take a long time, so be ready. If your memory hasn’t been overclocked beyond its XMP limits, you probably don’t need to test it, though it’s still wise due to the small risk of a defective stick.
If Memtest passes 3 times, it’s likely in good shape. Seven passes usually guarantee about 99.9% reliability.
I’m using the latest Prime95 version, which is around 29.4. Newer versions should perform better.
Also, I forgot to mention that I ran Memtest86 through DOS with 12 passes; I keep it running when I go to work.
I’ve tried all the recommended app testers from various forums, but I haven’t run Small FFT for over 15 hours this time.
Generally, I won’t do a stress test unless I plan to overclock.
Ryzen 5 1600 3.8 GHz 1.25V
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15R 2933MHz 1.35V SOC 1.1V (16-19-19-36)
Strix B-350F
Newer models aren't necessarily superior. Versions older than 26.6 use AVX instruction sets that aren't stable, so they shouldn't be the only factor when assessing thermal compliance or stability. If you intend to run applications that depend heavily on AVX, it makes sense to choose a version that supports them, but if not, it restricts your thermal performance and leads to overly high temperatures.
This level of accuracy brings you very close to complete stability. Stability isn't always 100% because other factors beyond the CPU and memory can influence it. However, ensuring both components will significantly reduce the risk of silent data corruption from configuration issues.
checking if the latest release supports AVX and reducing the thermal limit by 20°C
would be preferable, especially to maintain CPU temps below 75°C for models like 26.6 or newer?
Anything below 80°C at full capacity for fifteen minutes or longer meets the thermal requirements. Clearly, lower temperatures are preferable, but staying under 80°C aligns with Intel's suggestions. I personally prefer not to observe temperatures exceeding 70°C during testing, as that relates more to product durability than performance.