F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Optimizing performance on an i7 4790K

Optimizing performance on an i7 4790K

Optimizing performance on an i7 4790K

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
O
obomba
Junior Member
11
10-31-2016, 08:37 AM
#1
Hi, your setup looks solid for gaming and light overclocking. You've managed to hit a stable 4.6GHz with RealBench at 1.215V, which is great. The temperatures remain manageable under load. You mentioned trouble reaching 4.7GHz and getting BSODs, even with higher voltages. It might be worth checking the BIOS for any additional CPU overclocking parameters or power settings that could affect stability. Also, ensure your cooling system is functioning optimally—sometimes thermal throttling can interfere with sustained performance. Let me know if you want help reviewing specific BIOS options!
O
obomba
10-31-2016, 08:37 AM #1

Hi, your setup looks solid for gaming and light overclocking. You've managed to hit a stable 4.6GHz with RealBench at 1.215V, which is great. The temperatures remain manageable under load. You mentioned trouble reaching 4.7GHz and getting BSODs, even with higher voltages. It might be worth checking the BIOS for any additional CPU overclocking parameters or power settings that could affect stability. Also, ensure your cooling system is functioning optimally—sometimes thermal throttling can interfere with sustained performance. Let me know if you want help reviewing specific BIOS options!

E
emmavanas
Junior Member
3
10-31-2016, 09:58 AM
#2
The required power doesn't rise in a straightforward way. It also depends on the silicon selection. When the 4790k was released, 4.6GHz felt quite strong. A notable boost came from the later models. You might want to cut your memory speed down to 1600MHz for a more consistent 4.7GHz result.
E
emmavanas
10-31-2016, 09:58 AM #2

The required power doesn't rise in a straightforward way. It also depends on the silicon selection. When the 4790k was released, 4.6GHz felt quite strong. A notable boost came from the later models. You might want to cut your memory speed down to 1600MHz for a more consistent 4.7GHz result.

W
winnerplay25
Senior Member
477
11-06-2016, 02:01 PM
#3
You can attempt the test by applying 1.4 V. It may be sufficient to reach your CPU's 4.7 GHz, but you could notice a significant increase in heat. You might also consider adjusting the LLC (load-line calibration) if you haven't done so already. This adjustment can help stabilize voltage when your CPU is working under load.
W
winnerplay25
11-06-2016, 02:01 PM #3

You can attempt the test by applying 1.4 V. It may be sufficient to reach your CPU's 4.7 GHz, but you could notice a significant increase in heat. You might also consider adjusting the LLC (load-line calibration) if you haven't done so already. This adjustment can help stabilize voltage when your CPU is working under load.

P
ProffesorFrog
Member
137
11-06-2016, 08:53 PM
#4
Be careful with the CPU voltage input, it's typically kept at 2V during overclocking.
P
ProffesorFrog
11-06-2016, 08:53 PM #4

Be careful with the CPU voltage input, it's typically kept at 2V during overclocking.

H
HellaDapper
Member
225
11-07-2016, 04:15 AM
#5
employs Intel's proprietary mayonnaise within the heat spreader; a delid is needed to swap the paste for liquid metal, enabling the CPU to exceed 4.6GHz. Search for details—tutorials exist on YouTube and other platforms. An alternative approach involves using a CrystalWell laptop CPU with an L4 cache, modified for LGA1150 by local developers in China.
H
HellaDapper
11-07-2016, 04:15 AM #5

employs Intel's proprietary mayonnaise within the heat spreader; a delid is needed to swap the paste for liquid metal, enabling the CPU to exceed 4.6GHz. Search for details—tutorials exist on YouTube and other platforms. An alternative approach involves using a CrystalWell laptop CPU with an L4 cache, modified for LGA1150 by local developers in China.

I
ItzMaark
Member
110
11-14-2016, 11:20 AM
#6
Verify your signature. The removal won't instantly grant him a steady overclock. He's experiencing blue screen issues, not thermal throttling.
I
ItzMaark
11-14-2016, 11:20 AM #6

Verify your signature. The removal won't instantly grant him a steady overclock. He's experiencing blue screen issues, not thermal throttling.

G
GideonMax
Junior Member
10
11-14-2016, 02:44 PM
#7
This claim is incorrect. Most users who replace Intel's thermal paste don't switch to a liquid metal, which offers much higher conductivity—73 W/(mK) compared to 12.5 W/(mK) for standard paste, a sixfold improvement. The thinner layer also contributes to better heat transfer. I understand that a delid might not be beneficial in your situation. I sold my 4790K long time ago and don't recall the specific voltages needed to run it above 4.6 GHz, which is a common non-delid configuration for these chips.
G
GideonMax
11-14-2016, 02:44 PM #7

This claim is incorrect. Most users who replace Intel's thermal paste don't switch to a liquid metal, which offers much higher conductivity—73 W/(mK) compared to 12.5 W/(mK) for standard paste, a sixfold improvement. The thinner layer also contributes to better heat transfer. I understand that a delid might not be beneficial in your situation. I sold my 4790K long time ago and don't recall the specific voltages needed to run it above 4.6 GHz, which is a common non-delid configuration for these chips.

H
hector_xd
Junior Member
10
11-16-2016, 09:16 AM
#8
You're welcome on the suggestions. It's true that pushing overclocking can be tricky, but since you managed 4.6 stable at lower voltage, you're on the right track. Increasing input vintage to 2.0 is a good next step. Load line calibration refers to adjusting the voltage reference so your board runs smoothly across different voltages. To set it, refer to your motherboard manual or BIOS settings—usually you'll find options under power management or voltage scaling. Thanks again!
H
hector_xd
11-16-2016, 09:16 AM #8

You're welcome on the suggestions. It's true that pushing overclocking can be tricky, but since you managed 4.6 stable at lower voltage, you're on the right track. Increasing input vintage to 2.0 is a good next step. Load line calibration refers to adjusting the voltage reference so your board runs smoothly across different voltages. To set it, refer to your motherboard manual or BIOS settings—usually you'll find options under power management or voltage scaling. Thanks again!

R
RVCA_SKATER
Member
69
11-16-2016, 09:39 AM
#9
Adjusting the voltage to 2v will only damage your CPU and motherboard.
R
RVCA_SKATER
11-16-2016, 09:39 AM #9

Adjusting the voltage to 2v will only damage your CPU and motherboard.

_
_TrapBoy_
Member
224
11-16-2016, 11:09 AM
#10
low voltage refers to a range where 2.0 volts is considered safe, especially for CPUs around 32nm or older. It's important to note that even at 32nm, voltages near 2.0v can be close to the limits before reaching an instadeath.
_
_TrapBoy_
11-16-2016, 11:09 AM #10

low voltage refers to a range where 2.0 volts is considered safe, especially for CPUs around 32nm or older. It's important to note that even at 32nm, voltages near 2.0v can be close to the limits before reaching an instadeath.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next