Optimal video speeds depend on your setup and goals.
Optimal video speeds depend on your setup and goals.
Hey, I'm a console gamer planning to move to PC soon. I wanted to ask what people who consistently hit over 45fps think about frame rates. A. the lowest smoothness you'd accept B. the sweet spot for you C. a balanced middle ground (why do folks jump to 120 instantly?)
A. It varies a lot depending on the title; for indie titles 30 works, sightseeing games need around 60, and competitive shooters should aim for at least 120fps.
B. The standard remains 60Hz, but anything higher is acceptable—mainly based on your monitor and the game you're using.
You recently received your first 144Hz display and have been exploring its features for an hour. The smoothness and responsiveness are impressive, making the difference between 144 and 120Hz nearly invisible. It feels like a significant improvement over the 60Hz experience before. This 27GL83a is performing well so far.
Frame sync greatly impacts how smooth a video feels. I’m more satisfied with 30-45 frames per second when using freeframe, especially in most titles except for very fast shooters or those at 60+ fps that feel choppy. My 'perfect' rate is around 59 fps locked—roughly 60fps with no tearing. I also have a 60Hz display that isn’t frame-synced.
It was precisely what I did upon encountering a 144Hz monitor for the first time
Many individuals struggle to tell the difference between 100 and 144 hertz. This isn't uncommon. After reaching around 75 hertz, the benefits of smoothness become much less noticeable to the average person. Those who have spent extended periods playing fast-paced games on a 144 hertz setting will notice a significant contrast compared to lower frequencies.