F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking OC i5 6600K Results

OC i5 6600K Results

OC i5 6600K Results

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
S
strit211
Junior Member
37
09-24-2016, 11:51 AM
#1
Hello! Your recent overclocking on the i5 6600K was successful, especially since you haven’t changed it for three years. With the MSI Z170A Gaming M3 motherboard, you achieved stable 4.5Ghz at around 1.190v, and temperatures stayed within a healthy range of 58-60°C after an hour in AIDA64. The Dark Rock Pro 4 maintained good performance. This is definitely a solid result—your first overclock in your life!
S
strit211
09-24-2016, 11:51 AM #1

Hello! Your recent overclocking on the i5 6600K was successful, especially since you haven’t changed it for three years. With the MSI Z170A Gaming M3 motherboard, you achieved stable 4.5Ghz at around 1.190v, and temperatures stayed within a healthy range of 58-60°C after an hour in AIDA64. The Dark Rock Pro 4 maintained good performance. This is definitely a solid result—your first overclock in your life!

C
crazy_crew
Member
112
09-24-2016, 06:21 PM
#2
Your CPU is malfunctioning during that overclock. I wouldn't let it continue like this, as it could end up completely failing eventually.
C
crazy_crew
09-24-2016, 06:21 PM #2

Your CPU is malfunctioning during that overclock. I wouldn't let it continue like this, as it could end up completely failing eventually.

D
DustMC_
Member
207
09-26-2016, 10:17 AM
#3
It's a decent overclock. I'd try it with something other than AIDA64. Load RealBench and perform a 30-minute stress test using half your RAM, observing the temperatures. RealBench also puts pressure on your GPU and PSU. If you're only interested in testing your CPU, run the Prime95 torture test (disabling AVX) for 30 minutes.
D
DustMC_
09-26-2016, 10:17 AM #3

It's a decent overclock. I'd try it with something other than AIDA64. Load RealBench and perform a 30-minute stress test using half your RAM, observing the temperatures. RealBench also puts pressure on your GPU and PSU. If you're only interested in testing your CPU, run the Prime95 torture test (disabling AVX) for 30 minutes.

_
_ErikThePanda_
Posting Freak
807
09-27-2016, 02:53 AM
#4
I attempted Prime95 but after a short time I encountered these issues:
[Fri Feb 21 15:46:36 2020]
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.4999961336, expected less than 0.4
Hardware failure detected, refer to stress.txt file.
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.4964097877, expected less than 0.4
Hardware failure detected, refer to stress.txt file.
FATAL ERROR: Final result was B49014DB, expected: 87610A79.
Hardware failure detected, refer to stress.txt file.
Self-test 288K passed!
It seems three out of four cores experienced a hardware issue. The first one was still under stress testing.
Temperatures reached 69*C but only briefly before these errors appeared.
I don't think increasing the voltage would help—I didn't see any crashes, my games are running smoothly with normal temperatures, or I might be mistaken and need to address this.
EDIT: I recently ran a Cinebench test for a few minutes. It completed successfully at 60*C max.
_
_ErikThePanda_
09-27-2016, 02:53 AM #4

I attempted Prime95 but after a short time I encountered these issues:
[Fri Feb 21 15:46:36 2020]
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.4999961336, expected less than 0.4
Hardware failure detected, refer to stress.txt file.
FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.4964097877, expected less than 0.4
Hardware failure detected, refer to stress.txt file.
FATAL ERROR: Final result was B49014DB, expected: 87610A79.
Hardware failure detected, refer to stress.txt file.
Self-test 288K passed!
It seems three out of four cores experienced a hardware issue. The first one was still under stress testing.
Temperatures reached 69*C but only briefly before these errors appeared.
I don't think increasing the voltage would help—I didn't see any crashes, my games are running smoothly with normal temperatures, or I might be mistaken and need to address this.
EDIT: I recently ran a Cinebench test for a few minutes. It completed successfully at 60*C max.

D
Dr_Apophis
Junior Member
43
09-27-2016, 08:26 PM
#5
Your CPU is malfunctioning during that overclock. I wouldn't let it continue like this, as it could end up completely failing eventually.
D
Dr_Apophis
09-27-2016, 08:26 PM #5

Your CPU is malfunctioning during that overclock. I wouldn't let it continue like this, as it could end up completely failing eventually.

X
xBohmaNx
Member
123
10-17-2016, 03:27 PM
#6
Your overclock is not stable, you will risk data corruption. Given that you are getting errors, not BSOD and restarts. This would mean you are close to being stable.
X
xBohmaNx
10-17-2016, 03:27 PM #6

Your overclock is not stable, you will risk data corruption. Given that you are getting errors, not BSOD and restarts. This would mean you are close to being stable.

K
KebabIsLife
Member
63
10-17-2016, 08:44 PM
#7
Sorry, the situation isn't stable, Aida was too weak. Running a stress test at version 1.9 caused the system to crash. The issue seems limited to worker 2, with only the second worker reporting an error after a few seconds. I changed from version 1.19 to 1.24 and the problem persists. Should I check if enabling or disabling the CPU's prime and avx options helps?
K
KebabIsLife
10-17-2016, 08:44 PM #7

Sorry, the situation isn't stable, Aida was too weak. Running a stress test at version 1.9 caused the system to crash. The issue seems limited to worker 2, with only the second worker reporting an error after a few seconds. I changed from version 1.19 to 1.24 and the problem persists. Should I check if enabling or disabling the CPU's prime and avx options helps?

O
overcalm
Junior Member
6
10-18-2016, 11:14 AM
#8
I've consistently used pime95 with avx or aida64 cpu FPU. Others avoid it due to heat issues. I have excellent CPU cooling, so it works well. Aida64 is suggested because it checks all instructions. Running aida64's CPU FPU alone is also very demanding.
O
overcalm
10-18-2016, 11:14 AM #8

I've consistently used pime95 with avx or aida64 cpu FPU. Others avoid it due to heat issues. I have excellent CPU cooling, so it works well. Aida64 is suggested because it checks all instructions. Running aida64's CPU FPU alone is also very demanding.

E
ExpertBR
Member
54
10-18-2016, 07:24 PM
#9
I understand clearly... The 4.4Ghz processor with 1.26v cooling increased my CPU temperature to 81°C, which is quite high.
E
ExpertBR
10-18-2016, 07:24 PM #9

I understand clearly... The 4.4Ghz processor with 1.26v cooling increased my CPU temperature to 81°C, which is quite high.

K
Keuh20
Member
54
10-20-2016, 05:33 AM
#10
I accept your decision, no further thanks needed. Restored bios to defaults is fine. Testing the CPU under stress is a good idea, but a full BIOS reset might also help.
K
Keuh20
10-20-2016, 05:33 AM #10

I accept your decision, no further thanks needed. Restored bios to defaults is fine. Testing the CPU under stress is a good idea, but a full BIOS reset might also help.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next