F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Not meeting expectations in CS:GO

Not meeting expectations in CS:GO

Not meeting expectations in CS:GO

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
B
Blureux
Posting Freak
797
06-27-2022, 07:57 AM
#11
Check the game's settings menu to confirm if Multicore Rendering is enabled.
B
Blureux
06-27-2022, 07:57 AM #11

Check the game's settings menu to confirm if Multicore Rendering is enabled.

1
1winnie5
Member
62
07-03-2022, 05:13 PM
#12
It wasn't just me, I got confused too. I tested a new benchmark and reached around 350, still struggling at low settings like 1024x764. The video linked shows an R5 3600 overclocked to 4.2GHz, which might explain the big jump in performance.
1
1winnie5
07-03-2022, 05:13 PM #12

It wasn't just me, I got confused too. I tested a new benchmark and reached around 350, still struggling at low settings like 1024x764. The video linked shows an R5 3600 overclocked to 4.2GHz, which might explain the big jump in performance.

D
Diamondaholic
Member
108
07-04-2022, 09:52 PM
#13
I question whether a 200MHz boost will really add 150 extra frames per second, but honestly I also doubt you'll notice a difference between 350 and 500 FPS while playing. If you're unsure if your overclock is stable, as I mentioned earlier, attempt to run the benchmark at normal speeds again and check if the results shift.
D
Diamondaholic
07-04-2022, 09:52 PM #13

I question whether a 200MHz boost will really add 150 extra frames per second, but honestly I also doubt you'll notice a difference between 350 and 500 FPS while playing. If you're unsure if your overclock is stable, as I mentioned earlier, attempt to run the benchmark at normal speeds again and check if the results shift.

F
fireroster
Member
150
07-10-2022, 02:03 AM
#14
I checked a tutorial on overclocking in Ryzen Master and am getting familiar with it. I’ll share my thoughts soon once I’m done.
F
fireroster
07-10-2022, 02:03 AM #14

I checked a tutorial on overclocking in Ryzen Master and am getting familiar with it. I’ll share my thoughts soon once I’m done.

M
mcmack05
Member
199
07-29-2022, 06:04 AM
#15
Typically it's wiser to boost settings through the BIOS rather than relying on Ryzen Master. Still, Zen 2 chips already have limited overclocking options, so you might be safer setting it to auto and turning on PBO to handle the task. If your adjustments aren't stable, you could avoid crashes like other CPUs but expect slower gains—gradually raise the core multiplier while testing with a solid benchmark such as Cinebench to confirm improvements.
M
mcmack05
07-29-2022, 06:04 AM #15

Typically it's wiser to boost settings through the BIOS rather than relying on Ryzen Master. Still, Zen 2 chips already have limited overclocking options, so you might be safer setting it to auto and turning on PBO to handle the task. If your adjustments aren't stable, you could avoid crashes like other CPUs but expect slower gains—gradually raise the core multiplier while testing with a solid benchmark such as Cinebench to confirm improvements.

Z
zFenix045_
Member
126
08-01-2022, 05:28 AM
#16
Z
zFenix045_
08-01-2022, 05:28 AM #16

D
DuBzM8
Junior Member
14
08-01-2022, 07:08 AM
#17
I've checked my OC and base clock now. They both work similarly. I'm planning to run more tests.
D
DuBzM8
08-01-2022, 07:08 AM #17

I've checked my OC and base clock now. They both work similarly. I'm planning to run more tests.

F
FoxesCanFly
Member
62
08-01-2022, 08:30 AM
#18
Your setup appears to be configured properly with XMP/DOCP enabled and dual-channel support active.
F
FoxesCanFly
08-01-2022, 08:30 AM #18

Your setup appears to be configured properly with XMP/DOCP enabled and dual-channel support active.

S
134
08-04-2022, 07:55 PM
#19
Your display is positioned accurately, though I’m unsure if your BIOS settings are optimal. Check the link provided for reference.
S
skydoestoddler
08-04-2022, 07:55 PM #19

Your display is positioned accurately, though I’m unsure if your BIOS settings are optimal. Check the link provided for reference.

O
ostenvelez
Member
241
08-04-2022, 09:31 PM
#20
The CAs# latency (CL) is actually 22, not 16. My recall might be off.
O
ostenvelez
08-04-2022, 09:31 PM #20

The CAs# latency (CL) is actually 22, not 16. My recall might be off.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next