F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming `````````None of those is correct. You only want to paste the rewritten text here.

`````````None of those is correct. You only want to paste the rewritten text here.

`````````None of those is correct. You only want to paste the rewritten text here.

J
JordyMc1
Junior Member
45
05-21-2017, 01:01 PM
#1
Here’s a rewritten version of the text, aiming for clarity and conciseness:

“I recently upgraded my graphics card from an AMD Radeon RX 380 to an AMD Radeon R9 Fury, hoping to improve performance in Rust. However, I'm seeing minimal impact on FPS despite the significant upgrade. My system consists of an AMD Ryzen 5 1400 CPU, 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT RAM, a 120GB PNY CS1311 SSD, and an MSI Tomahawk b350 motherboard running Windows 10. I’m using a 1600x900 resolution monitor with a refresh rate of 60Hz (without FPS limiting). I've installed the latest AMD Adrenaline drivers. While my CPU usage is around 50% during gameplay, and I experience lag spikes when the drive is active, the R9 Fury’s utilization remains at approximately 60%, suggesting it isn't being fully utilized. The changes to graphics settings don't improve FPS either.”
J
JordyMc1
05-21-2017, 01:01 PM #1

Here’s a rewritten version of the text, aiming for clarity and conciseness:

“I recently upgraded my graphics card from an AMD Radeon RX 380 to an AMD Radeon R9 Fury, hoping to improve performance in Rust. However, I'm seeing minimal impact on FPS despite the significant upgrade. My system consists of an AMD Ryzen 5 1400 CPU, 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT RAM, a 120GB PNY CS1311 SSD, and an MSI Tomahawk b350 motherboard running Windows 10. I’m using a 1600x900 resolution monitor with a refresh rate of 60Hz (without FPS limiting). I've installed the latest AMD Adrenaline drivers. While my CPU usage is around 50% during gameplay, and I experience lag spikes when the drive is active, the R9 Fury’s utilization remains at approximately 60%, suggesting it isn't being fully utilized. The changes to graphics settings don't improve FPS either.”

C
CaveMiner1215
Member
91
06-03-2017, 12:31 AM
#2
You could try the following which may help
- In the command prompt of rust type the following "fps.limit 200" which will uncap the frames which used to help me.
- start > Run > Msconfig > boot tab > Advanced options > tick number of processors and click the drop down to the high available there - This also helped my CPU to use all cores or maintain my system to get better results.
Worth a shot
Kind regards
C
CaveMiner1215
06-03-2017, 12:31 AM #2

You could try the following which may help
- In the command prompt of rust type the following "fps.limit 200" which will uncap the frames which used to help me.
- start > Run > Msconfig > boot tab > Advanced options > tick number of processors and click the drop down to the high available there - This also helped my CPU to use all cores or maintain my system to get better results.
Worth a shot
Kind regards

A
averyreese
Member
163
06-03-2017, 04:33 AM
#3
If changing resolution does not help, then the bottleneck is with the CPU, but keep in mind some games just don't run at high FPS not matter what you run them on.
A
averyreese
06-03-2017, 04:33 AM #3

If changing resolution does not help, then the bottleneck is with the CPU, but keep in mind some games just don't run at high FPS not matter what you run them on.

T
The_Drolli
Member
70
06-03-2017, 06:23 AM
#4
You could try the following which may help
- In the command prompt of rust type the following "fps.limit 200" which will uncap the frames which used to help me.
- start > Run > Msconfig > boot tab > Advanced options > tick number of processors and click the drop down to the high available there - This also helped my CPU to use all cores or maintain my system to get better results.
Worth a shot
Kind regards
T
The_Drolli
06-03-2017, 06:23 AM #4

You could try the following which may help
- In the command prompt of rust type the following "fps.limit 200" which will uncap the frames which used to help me.
- start > Run > Msconfig > boot tab > Advanced options > tick number of processors and click the drop down to the high available there - This also helped my CPU to use all cores or maintain my system to get better results.
Worth a shot
Kind regards

N
Nomachio
Junior Member
49
06-03-2017, 03:12 PM
#5
Possible the memory speed is holding back the CPU, what is the ram specs / model and what does the BIOS detect?
I just put together my 2600x / b450 rig with 3200 ram, and had to set the XMP profile to get it to run at 3200. The default was 2133 or something like that - got lucky I didn't have to update my BIOS or anything to get it to work with XMP. May have to update your BIOS if yours does not boot up at the correct speed.
N
Nomachio
06-03-2017, 03:12 PM #5

Possible the memory speed is holding back the CPU, what is the ram specs / model and what does the BIOS detect?
I just put together my 2600x / b450 rig with 3200 ram, and had to set the XMP profile to get it to run at 3200. The default was 2133 or something like that - got lucky I didn't have to update my BIOS or anything to get it to work with XMP. May have to update your BIOS if yours does not boot up at the correct speed.