F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop no such chips exist because consumer markets prioritize efficiency and cost over niche hardware like quad threads.

no such chips exist because consumer markets prioritize efficiency and cost over niche hardware like quad threads.

no such chips exist because consumer markets prioritize efficiency and cost over niche hardware like quad threads.

M
M_Xx_H
Member
173
10-17-2016, 09:20 AM
#1
I've noticed several quad-core processors available on the market, but they haven't become widely popular yet.
M
M_Xx_H
10-17-2016, 09:20 AM #1

I've noticed several quad-core processors available on the market, but they haven't become widely popular yet.

B
blastmanZ10
Junior Member
40
10-17-2016, 10:07 AM
#2
It seems you're referring to older hardware with just two processing units. Those were common in the past, but today's CPUs typically have multiple cores for better performance. More cores generally mean more threads and improved efficiency.
B
blastmanZ10
10-17-2016, 10:07 AM #2

It seems you're referring to older hardware with just two processing units. Those were common in the past, but today's CPUs typically have multiple cores for better performance. More cores generally mean more threads and improved efficiency.

A
ACeHARDSCOPES
Junior Member
19
10-23-2016, 06:40 AM
#3
I believe @Sree357 is talking about CPUs like IBM's Power9, which supports either 4 or 8 way SMT. POWER9 - Wikipedia This technology is mainly beneficial for specific tasks. With only 2 way SMT on consumer chips, the gains are limited to about 20% per core at best, and in some cases it can even hurt performance. Additionally, increasing the number of SMT threads brings diminishing returns, making it not worthwhile for consumer processors to go beyond the standard 2-way configuration.
A
ACeHARDSCOPES
10-23-2016, 06:40 AM #3

I believe @Sree357 is talking about CPUs like IBM's Power9, which supports either 4 or 8 way SMT. POWER9 - Wikipedia This technology is mainly beneficial for specific tasks. With only 2 way SMT on consumer chips, the gains are limited to about 20% per core at best, and in some cases it can even hurt performance. Additionally, increasing the number of SMT threads brings diminishing returns, making it not worthwhile for consumer processors to go beyond the standard 2-way configuration.

Q
Queffect
Member
219
10-23-2016, 10:37 AM
#4
These systems shine when handling tasks beyond standard desktop capabilities. The extra demands would be incredibly challenging to manage.
Q
Queffect
10-23-2016, 10:37 AM #4

These systems shine when handling tasks beyond standard desktop capabilities. The extra demands would be incredibly challenging to manage.

Y
yojochemhier
Junior Member
37
10-23-2016, 04:38 PM
#5
Relocated to CPUs, motherboards, and memory components
Y
yojochemhier
10-23-2016, 04:38 PM #5

Relocated to CPUs, motherboards, and memory components

F
filcio1234
Member
211
10-30-2016, 11:39 PM
#6
CPU designs typically feature one or two threads per core, which explains why some processors offer 8 cores with 16 threads or 4 threads per core resulting in an 8-core/32-thread configuration. However, not all CPUs provide extra threads, making it less beneficial to go beyond 16 threads. In consumer applications, specialized tasks are needed to fully utilize more threads, which isn't commonly available. Therefore, opting for a higher thread count like 16 per core is generally more advantageous.
F
filcio1234
10-30-2016, 11:39 PM #6

CPU designs typically feature one or two threads per core, which explains why some processors offer 8 cores with 16 threads or 4 threads per core resulting in an 8-core/32-thread configuration. However, not all CPUs provide extra threads, making it less beneficial to go beyond 16 threads. In consumer applications, specialized tasks are needed to fully utilize more threads, which isn't commonly available. Therefore, opting for a higher thread count like 16 per core is generally more advantageous.

M
MrBrights
Junior Member
24
11-11-2016, 06:52 PM
#7
There were too many typos, making it hard to grasp their question.
M
MrBrights
11-11-2016, 06:52 PM #7

There were too many typos, making it hard to grasp their question.