No information on Ryzen 3 CPUs compatible with AM5.
No information on Ryzen 3 CPUs compatible with AM5.
Historically you appreciated the ability to start with an inexpensive processor and upgrade later for better performance. You could move from a basic single-core chip to a high-end model like the Phenom II X6. Your current gaming setup is simple—just a quad-core CPU with integrated graphics for 1080p playback. My own setup is even simpler, using a 1024x768 display connected through a scan converter for basic anti-aliasing. I’d also like a CPU that supports AVX to stream TV or handle streaming sites without excessive overhead.
Intel is providing this benefit, AMD requires you to use the older generation, and the previous socket remains relevant.
AMD keeps releasing top-tier products, similar to Intel. They might introduce more affordable models in the future, just like with the R5, but not anymore targeting R3 levels.
For me, socket versions aren't important. Upgrading your CPU every few years doesn't really add value in my view. It seems unnecessary to stick with the same motherboard if Intel consistently uses two generations per socket.
I interpret this as AM5 offering roughly four additional years of support, with a Ryzen 7 X3D becoming affordable around five years from now, and in another five years, the fastest Ryzen 9 X3D for that platform could be available at a lower price since it would be two socket generations behind.
Intel seems to be moving toward a final generation similar to AM4, much like their present platform won't last long. OP has been thinking about this too and thinks a 4-core AM5 might match the performance of a 6-core AM4. Before the A620 launch and when memory prices drop slightly, AM5 probably isn't worth it for those needing less power. If manufacturing yields are good, they won't be pushed to disable cores and release lower-tier CPUs. I expect AM5 will become more common once top-of-the-line components are widely available. Your idea of buying now and upgrading later makes sense—though only for the tiny 0.01% of users in the past decade who built three systems and delayed upgrades until later. After four years, faster RAM and new features make it worthwhile. Upgrading just the CPU might be an overblown notion, especially if you can reuse or sell the old setup.
With chiplets they can be reused more often. TSMC probably has a process that minimizes waste. Sticking with AM4 and DDR4 works well for upgrades and keeps factory parts affordable. It’s convenient for users who want to upgrade later, and the supply of chipsets, RAM, and memory should stay reasonable. I’m planning to build an iGPU system for office use and can’t justify the extra $200 jump from AM4 6-core to AM5 6-core. Sure, the R7600 is much stronger, but power isn’t the priority right now. Six years ago I bought the top-of-the-line i7-7700K, now I’m saving up for a more basic model that still meets my needs.