F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Network speed limited to 300Mbps on gigabit connections

Network speed limited to 300Mbps on gigabit connections

Network speed limited to 300Mbps on gigabit connections

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
D
dvarela1
Member
87
09-11-2016, 01:48 PM
#1
During file transfers from my server's HDD using SMB over Wi-Fi on my Ubiquiti AP AC PRO (configured at 80MHz channel width), I achieve around 22MB/s, which is near the drive’s maximum of 27MB/s. However, when accessing the SSD via SSH, the speed drops to a maximum of 38MB/s, falling short of the expected 50MB/s or higher. Although Wi-Fi isn’t ideal due to instability and potential speed limits, I anticipate better performance given my current setup.
D
dvarela1
09-11-2016, 01:48 PM #1

During file transfers from my server's HDD using SMB over Wi-Fi on my Ubiquiti AP AC PRO (configured at 80MHz channel width), I achieve around 22MB/s, which is near the drive’s maximum of 27MB/s. However, when accessing the SSD via SSH, the speed drops to a maximum of 38MB/s, falling short of the expected 50MB/s or higher. Although Wi-Fi isn’t ideal due to instability and potential speed limits, I anticipate better performance given my current setup.

H
hdoor20
Senior Member
477
09-12-2016, 02:48 PM
#2
SSH uses significantly more resources compared to SMB when transferring data. For an accurate comparison, ensure both protocols are used consistently in your tests. Have you applied the same protocol for both scenarios?
H
hdoor20
09-12-2016, 02:48 PM #2

SSH uses significantly more resources compared to SMB when transferring data. For an accurate comparison, ensure both protocols are used consistently in your tests. Have you applied the same protocol for both scenarios?

D
DRGNdragsYT
Senior Member
723
09-12-2016, 10:03 PM
#3
The SSD served as both my boot and system storage, not configured for SMB sharing. This made it accessible on my network. I also moved a large file to the server using its GUI file browser, copying it via SSH to the same internal drive, which achieved speeds exceeding 50 MB/s.
D
DRGNdragsYT
09-12-2016, 10:03 PM #3

The SSD served as both my boot and system storage, not configured for SMB sharing. This made it accessible on my network. I also moved a large file to the server using its GUI file browser, copying it via SSH to the same internal drive, which achieved speeds exceeding 50 MB/s.

W
wizugame
Member
117
09-14-2016, 04:10 AM
#4
Great speed! SSH has always been slower than this, even over a wired link. Let's try a quick check. Can you plug in an Ethernet cable to the machine (turn off Wi-Fi) and run an SSH transfer? This should help us figure out if the problem is network-related.
W
wizugame
09-14-2016, 04:10 AM #4

Great speed! SSH has always been slower than this, even over a wired link. Let's try a quick check. Can you plug in an Ethernet cable to the machine (turn off Wi-Fi) and run an SSH transfer? This should help us figure out if the problem is network-related.

T
Tyrex06
Member
63
09-14-2016, 04:23 AM
#5
I believe I ran the test via a cable; I’ll retry now. Just need a laptop with an Ethernet port because my device lacks one (sorry manufacturers).
T
Tyrex06
09-14-2016, 04:23 AM #5

I believe I ran the test via a cable; I’ll retry now. Just need a laptop with an Ethernet port because my device lacks one (sorry manufacturers).

J
John_Mc_Kaine
Junior Member
6
09-15-2016, 09:01 AM
#6
Test completed. Performance wasn't highly consistent during the test, yet it achieved 85 MB/s within the initial moments.
J
John_Mc_Kaine
09-15-2016, 09:01 AM #6

Test completed. Performance wasn't highly consistent during the test, yet it achieved 85 MB/s within the initial moments.

M
McAlden
Member
60
09-16-2016, 06:38 PM
#7
You're choosing SSH over SMB for security reasons, likely because you're connecting from outside your home network or using a different Wi-Fi network.
M
McAlden
09-16-2016, 06:38 PM #7

You're choosing SSH over SMB for security reasons, likely because you're connecting from outside your home network or using a different Wi-Fi network.

T
Terrafin3015
Member
183
09-16-2016, 07:13 PM
#8
Since I mentioned earlier, the SSD is my main storage drive, and openmediavault doesn't allow me to include it in SMB shares easily. Also, I rely on SSH for remote access outside my local network. No, I'm using just one network with no subnets.
T
Terrafin3015
09-16-2016, 07:13 PM #8

Since I mentioned earlier, the SSD is my main storage drive, and openmediavault doesn't allow me to include it in SMB shares easily. Also, I rely on SSH for remote access outside my local network. No, I'm using just one network with no subnets.

H
heroboy17
Senior Member
528
09-20-2016, 12:48 PM
#9
iperf indicates performance metrics rather than actual file transfer rates. Copying files doesn't accurately reflect network speed, as you won't achieve the advertised wifi speeds. Those are link speeds, and typically only a third to half of them are realized during real-world usage.
H
heroboy17
09-20-2016, 12:48 PM #9

iperf indicates performance metrics rather than actual file transfer rates. Copying files doesn't accurately reflect network speed, as you won't achieve the advertised wifi speeds. Those are link speeds, and typically only a third to half of them are realized during real-world usage.

M
Mario70005
Junior Member
17
09-20-2016, 06:44 PM
#10
I haven't configured iperf; it's available for both Windows and Linux by default. For testing speeds, you can run commands like "iperf -c <server> -t 1" from your laptop to compare with the AP or server. Your goal is to achieve around 400 Mbps.
M
Mario70005
09-20-2016, 06:44 PM #10

I haven't configured iperf; it's available for both Windows and Linux by default. For testing speeds, you can run commands like "iperf -c <server> -t 1" from your laptop to compare with the AP or server. Your goal is to achieve around 400 Mbps.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next