F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop MoBo is delivering an insane voltage to the CPU!

MoBo is delivering an insane voltage to the CPU!

MoBo is delivering an insane voltage to the CPU!

S
Stampycat777
Member
66
06-27-2025, 08:03 AM
#1
In my system I have a -0.07V offset. Yes, it tends to exceed 1.4V and jump to 100c during any game, which is similar now too. The Mobo and CPU models are displayed in the attached picture. No overclocking since it's not a K variant. With forced voltage it stays steady at 1.195V (I haven't tested lower). (At that voltage I'm getting around 70-80°C), the problem is that with forced voltage it always stays at 1.195V. Why does the default BIOS setting make the CPU pull such high voltages? I've tried three different BIOS versions, including the latest, but nothing works. Also, even though it's stable at 1.195V when overridden, I can't go below -0.15V with the offset, then the PC won't turn on, but that -0.15V brings me to about 1.3V. Anyone have any advice? (The order is Current / Minimum / Maximum / Average)
S
Stampycat777
06-27-2025, 08:03 AM #1

In my system I have a -0.07V offset. Yes, it tends to exceed 1.4V and jump to 100c during any game, which is similar now too. The Mobo and CPU models are displayed in the attached picture. No overclocking since it's not a K variant. With forced voltage it stays steady at 1.195V (I haven't tested lower). (At that voltage I'm getting around 70-80°C), the problem is that with forced voltage it always stays at 1.195V. Why does the default BIOS setting make the CPU pull such high voltages? I've tried three different BIOS versions, including the latest, but nothing works. Also, even though it's stable at 1.195V when overridden, I can't go below -0.15V with the offset, then the PC won't turn on, but that -0.15V brings me to about 1.3V. Anyone have any advice? (The order is Current / Minimum / Maximum / Average)

Z
Zemboyy
Member
235
06-27-2025, 12:12 PM
#2
You're referring to VID and VCore voltages. VID is the voltage the CPU asks for, while VCore is what the VRM sends to it. By default, they differ slightly, and adjusting VRM settings with offsets makes them even more apart. At 1.4V, it seems reasonable for an 8th generation CPU—it matches typical behavior. It might just mean you're not providing enough power for a 6-core Coffee Lake chip.
Z
Zemboyy
06-27-2025, 12:12 PM #2

You're referring to VID and VCore voltages. VID is the voltage the CPU asks for, while VCore is what the VRM sends to it. By default, they differ slightly, and adjusting VRM settings with offsets makes them even more apart. At 1.4V, it seems reasonable for an 8th generation CPU—it matches typical behavior. It might just mean you're not providing enough power for a 6-core Coffee Lake chip.

1
1Kigzey1
Member
63
06-27-2025, 07:05 PM
#3
Thanks for the update.

It seems the VID voltage was also capped at 1.195V when adjusting the core voltage in BIOS to that level. That’s why I initially thought they were the same. The TDP is 65W, and it’s running around 140W under normal settings—likely due to throttling. It makes sense that cooling isn’t sufficient, but it’s still better than the stock cooler. I’m wondering if this is typical behavior.
1
1Kigzey1
06-27-2025, 07:05 PM #3

Thanks for the update.

It seems the VID voltage was also capped at 1.195V when adjusting the core voltage in BIOS to that level. That’s why I initially thought they were the same. The TDP is 65W, and it’s running around 140W under normal settings—likely due to throttling. It makes sense that cooling isn’t sufficient, but it’s still better than the stock cooler. I’m wondering if this is typical behavior.

P
PotatoePat
Junior Member
11
07-03-2025, 10:52 PM
#4
It seems Intel's turbo mode really boosts performance initially, but after about 43 seconds it reverts to the base clock for the rest of the task. The 100C behaves differently—it feels like the cooler isn't properly secured, because under full load on a Hyper 212 it should take around 10 to 20 seconds to reach 100C.
P
PotatoePat
07-03-2025, 10:52 PM #4

It seems Intel's turbo mode really boosts performance initially, but after about 43 seconds it reverts to the base clock for the rest of the task. The 100C behaves differently—it feels like the cooler isn't properly secured, because under full load on a Hyper 212 it should take around 10 to 20 seconds to reach 100C.

C
CatFlag
Member
53
07-04-2025, 12:03 AM
#5
Unclear what's wrong. I used three different coolers, including an AIO, and changed the mounts over 15 times without any improvement. Is there an issue with the CPU heatsink?
C
CatFlag
07-04-2025, 12:03 AM #5

Unclear what's wrong. I used three different coolers, including an AIO, and changed the mounts over 15 times without any improvement. Is there an issue with the CPU heatsink?

K
Kavenoke
Member
242
07-04-2025, 06:45 AM
#6
They might be facing a few potential issues, though after trying three options I'd lean toward something else. My initial thought would be a thermal paste problem—either the product you're using is of very low quality or you're not applying enough. Still, it shouldn't be this severe. It's also conceivable the CPU has an extremely uneven IHS, which is rare but possible.
K
Kavenoke
07-04-2025, 06:45 AM #6

They might be facing a few potential issues, though after trying three options I'd lean toward something else. My initial thought would be a thermal paste problem—either the product you're using is of very low quality or you're not applying enough. Still, it shouldn't be this severe. It's also conceivable the CPU has an extremely uneven IHS, which is rare but possible.

U
Udlu
Member
193
07-05-2025, 09:55 PM
#7
I think it's possible, though very rare—about one in a million. Maybe I'm the one with the winning insight! The hardware specs say it's fine, and since you're using MX4, it shouldn't be a problem turning on Prime95.
U
Udlu
07-05-2025, 09:55 PM #7

I think it's possible, though very rare—about one in a million. Maybe I'm the one with the winning insight! The hardware specs say it's fine, and since you're using MX4, it shouldn't be a problem turning on Prime95.

B
bluSammla94
Junior Member
30
07-06-2025, 06:27 AM
#8
It's typical with Prime95. You'll need a substantial AIO to maintain the 8700 cool under heavy load, especially given the poor stock TIM between the IHS and die. Even my delidded 7700K behaves similarly in Prime95, reaching around 90°C and holding there instead of spiking to 100°C. When you mentioned hitting instant 100°C, you were probably referring to software like Blender or Cinebench rather than the most demanding CPU tasks. Also, for an IHS issue severe enough to cause visible problems at room temperature, it would definitely be noticeable without equipment.
B
bluSammla94
07-06-2025, 06:27 AM #8

It's typical with Prime95. You'll need a substantial AIO to maintain the 8700 cool under heavy load, especially given the poor stock TIM between the IHS and die. Even my delidded 7700K behaves similarly in Prime95, reaching around 90°C and holding there instead of spiking to 100°C. When you mentioned hitting instant 100°C, you were probably referring to software like Blender or Cinebench rather than the most demanding CPU tasks. Also, for an IHS issue severe enough to cause visible problems at room temperature, it would definitely be noticeable without equipment.

E
ElAlePapuh
Member
141
07-10-2025, 10:13 AM
#9
I installed pirme95 since HT was turned off and games stopped using it. When HT was active, Minecraft Windows Edition with 32+ chunks could launch instantly.
E
ElAlePapuh
07-10-2025, 10:13 AM #9

I installed pirme95 since HT was turned off and games stopped using it. When HT was active, Minecraft Windows Edition with 32+ chunks could launch instantly.

H
Hok_SL
Member
55
07-11-2025, 02:28 PM
#10
Turbo Enhanced should automatically activate as Auto/Enabled. Consider turning it off for improved default performance. These options are typically set by default to deliver better out-of-the-box results.
H
Hok_SL
07-11-2025, 02:28 PM #10

Turbo Enhanced should automatically activate as Auto/Enabled. Consider turning it off for improved default performance. These options are typically set by default to deliver better out-of-the-box results.