F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming minecraft server xeon vs. i9

minecraft server xeon vs. i9

minecraft server xeon vs. i9

P
Proforno
Member
209
09-14-2018, 04:40 PM
#1
Hi all,
I'm exploring the setup of a Minecraft Java Edition server for around 100 players, with likely two dozen scripts running. Minecraft is mainly single-threaded and needs top CPU performance. I'm aiming to distribute the workload across all three base worlds—over-world, nether, and end—so each player's instance handles its own tasks instead of relying on just one. I'm evaluating options like Eater with an i9-9900k on a Z390 board or an Xeon E-2288G on a C246 board. The budget isn't a concern here. What CPU recommendations do you have for this kind of server? Thanks for your help.
P
Proforno
09-14-2018, 04:40 PM #1

Hi all,
I'm exploring the setup of a Minecraft Java Edition server for around 100 players, with likely two dozen scripts running. Minecraft is mainly single-threaded and needs top CPU performance. I'm aiming to distribute the workload across all three base worlds—over-world, nether, and end—so each player's instance handles its own tasks instead of relying on just one. I'm evaluating options like Eater with an i9-9900k on a Z390 board or an Xeon E-2288G on a C246 board. The budget isn't a concern here. What CPU recommendations do you have for this kind of server? Thanks for your help.

B
benbossgaming
Member
65
09-14-2018, 10:03 PM
#2
Minecraft requires sufficient RAM and bandwidth alongside CPU strength.
B
benbossgaming
09-14-2018, 10:03 PM #2

Minecraft requires sufficient RAM and bandwidth alongside CPU strength.

M
m4xesh3pard
Member
177
09-18-2018, 05:10 PM
#3
My Minecraft server uses a lot of RAM. They're heavily modified and I'm running four worlds at once. Managing RAM is the main challenge since only eight cores are available for the server. Everything works fine.

All in all, more RAM and a balanced CPU setup will help.
M
m4xesh3pard
09-18-2018, 05:10 PM #3

My Minecraft server uses a lot of RAM. They're heavily modified and I'm running four worlds at once. Managing RAM is the main challenge since only eight cores are available for the server. Everything works fine.

All in all, more RAM and a balanced CPU setup will help.

O
Orangecassie8
Junior Member
30
09-18-2018, 06:44 PM
#4
It seems you're considering the I9-9900k as your choice. My intention has always been to install 32GB of RAM regardless of the CPU selected. I'm also learning that the 10th generation is expected in May. The i9-10900k offers a faster boost clock compared to the i9-9900k, which might be beneficial for Minecraft. I'm thinking about whether to wait for the 10th generation release or stick with the i9-9900k and start the world in the summer.
O
Orangecassie8
09-18-2018, 06:44 PM #4

It seems you're considering the I9-9900k as your choice. My intention has always been to install 32GB of RAM regardless of the CPU selected. I'm also learning that the 10th generation is expected in May. The i9-10900k offers a faster boost clock compared to the i9-9900k, which might be beneficial for Minecraft. I'm thinking about whether to wait for the 10th generation release or stick with the i9-9900k and start the world in the summer.

L
luluj2015
Member
188
09-20-2018, 04:05 AM
#5
Unless you're planning to run numerous MC servers or worlds on that machine, the i9 (9th Gen) should suffice.
L
luluj2015
09-20-2018, 04:05 AM #5

Unless you're planning to run numerous MC servers or worlds on that machine, the i9 (9th Gen) should suffice.

S
Superlettuce19
Senior Member
370
09-23-2018, 12:05 AM
#6
I manage a Minecraft server for close contacts and relatives (around six players) using an older Athlon processor. I've increased the RAM significantly, but I'm not trying to overburden the CPU performance.
S
Superlettuce19
09-23-2018, 12:05 AM #6

I manage a Minecraft server for close contacts and relatives (around six players) using an older Athlon processor. I've increased the RAM significantly, but I'm not trying to overburden the CPU performance.

R
Redstoner137
Posting Freak
811
09-27-2018, 04:14 PM
#7
I retrieved it from the link by using the available options.
R
Redstoner137
09-27-2018, 04:14 PM #7

I retrieved it from the link by using the available options.

T
240
09-28-2018, 09:54 PM
#8
I note that the suggestion avoids AMD or XEON processors.
I already have a Threadripper (2990wx) and it struggles with heavy single-threaded tasks because of its lower clock speed—around 3.8 OCed, drawing about 400W during testing, and it still fails unexpectedly even after working fine for days.
T
TheDonnelTrain
09-28-2018, 09:54 PM #8

I note that the suggestion avoids AMD or XEON processors.
I already have a Threadripper (2990wx) and it struggles with heavy single-threaded tasks because of its lower clock speed—around 3.8 OCed, drawing about 400W during testing, and it still fails unexpectedly even after working fine for days.