Mac Nano Concept
Mac Nano Concept
When considering refurbished or used options, I can explore lower price points. You can find computers suited for specific tasks under $250 or less for an individual job. Focusing on brand-new hardware provides Apple with a benefit, since their products retain value longer. Still, if you're discussing overall worth, it's a different conversation altogether. For others, the cost hurdle remains too high even when better results are achieved.
You seem to be assuming that poor people can't save money. That's not true. You are right, money is a barrier to entry. PCs are not affordable to some people. For some people a R Pi will break the bank. Affordable is a relative term and there isn't a hard number to define it for a computer. But I am and know "poor people" that have a Mac. Sorry to burst your bubble, but we exist. You claimed, "apple is allergic to affordability" which is untrue as evidenced by past and current products.
It seems we use various interpretations of "affordability." I thought it referred to a low cost, but another person in the discussion shared my view. Perhaps we should discuss with @ToboRobot whether "affordability" means "low price" or "fair value." These ideas aren't the same, and I never intended them to be.
Affordability varies depending on the perspective. What seems cheap can often be costly in the long term. It's unfair to expect low-income individuals to overlook these factors and simply choose lower-priced items without considering quality or durability. Strategic purchasing decisions should be based on value, not just initial cost.
I noticed what you did. You mentioned apples don't have affordable options, which I didn't agree with and pointed out iPads are reasonably priced, though that's not necessarily a clear sign of low cost. I also said the Mac Mini is available, suggesting it was within budget even if other cheaper models exist. Yes, I understand that low price can mean affordability and good value, but it isn't always the case. Sometimes lower upfront costs lead to higher expenses over time and reduced overall value. I've bought shoes that were inexpensive but ended up costing more when replacements were needed. Computers work the same way. I hope you can see this point, as it's a tricky idea to grasp—maybe real-life experience will help clarify it.
I’ve emphasized that the products offer strong worth. My journey shifted from financial hardship to building a solid savings base, ready to sell my home soon. Through real-life lessons, I’ve learned that low cost doesn’t always equal true value. What matters is whether something fits within the broader market price range. Many people struggle to meet basic expenses, yet they can easily access other tech alternatives or custom solutions. For me, true affordability isn’t just about immediate spending—it’s about having the means to invest in quality without debt.