F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks M.2 slot with E Wireless card compatible with AMD chipset

M.2 slot with E Wireless card compatible with AMD chipset

M.2 slot with E Wireless card compatible with AMD chipset

D
dehunter456
Member
237
07-04-2016, 03:36 PM
#1
I checked the available wireless cards for my motherboard and noticed one labeled "Intel only." Upon closer inspection, I didn’t find any that supported AMD. It seems I might have missed something—maybe an AMD board with an M.2 slot for WiFi exists but isn’t listed?
D
dehunter456
07-04-2016, 03:36 PM #1

I checked the available wireless cards for my motherboard and noticed one labeled "Intel only." Upon closer inspection, I didn’t find any that supported AMD. It seems I might have missed something—maybe an AMD board with an M.2 slot for WiFi exists but isn’t listed?

S
slayer__is
Senior Member
521
07-11-2016, 05:58 PM
#2
Today’s Wi-Fi 6 devices rely on the Intel AX200 chipset for both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. With a Key E slot available, it makes sense to source the component directly from Intel. This choice works regardless of whether you’re using an AMD or Intel processor.
S
slayer__is
07-11-2016, 05:58 PM #2

Today’s Wi-Fi 6 devices rely on the Intel AX200 chipset for both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. With a Key E slot available, it makes sense to source the component directly from Intel. This choice works regardless of whether you’re using an AMD or Intel processor.

S
SpookyJay
Member
203
07-11-2016, 07:44 PM
#3
Generally, any Intel wireless card should function with devices that support PCIe and USB for Bluetooth, provided the necessary drivers are installed. For instance, I recently purchased an Intel AX200 and successfully connected it to my Ryzen system, achieving Wi-Fi 6 performance instantly. Note: My setup uses an 8260 module, not the AX200, which is the latest 802.11ac model.
S
SpookyJay
07-11-2016, 07:44 PM #3

Generally, any Intel wireless card should function with devices that support PCIe and USB for Bluetooth, provided the necessary drivers are installed. For instance, I recently purchased an Intel AX200 and successfully connected it to my Ryzen system, achieving Wi-Fi 6 performance instantly. Note: My setup uses an 8260 module, not the AX200, which is the latest 802.11ac model.

J
JONNTHENOOB
Member
194
07-14-2016, 05:30 PM
#4
We have two versions of the Intel WiFi components—one uses PCIe and the other uses CNVio. The CNVio version needs a specific Intel chipset since the MAC is built into the chipset. Any PCIe variant that isn't CNVio should be compatible.
J
JONNTHENOOB
07-14-2016, 05:30 PM #4

We have two versions of the Intel WiFi components—one uses PCIe and the other uses CNVio. The CNVio version needs a specific Intel chipset since the MAC is built into the chipset. Any PCIe variant that isn't CNVio should be compatible.

Q
queenie988
Junior Member
4
07-14-2016, 10:56 PM
#5
It explains why some people focus solely on Intel while others ignore hardware issues. Thanks!
Q
queenie988
07-14-2016, 10:56 PM #5

It explains why some people focus solely on Intel while others ignore hardware issues. Thanks!

D
Darkeos
Senior Member
538
07-15-2016, 05:01 AM
#6
Can I swap the external antennas with the internal ones?
D
Darkeos
07-15-2016, 05:01 AM #6

Can I swap the external antennas with the internal ones?

J
jamous1
Member
197
07-15-2016, 06:52 AM
#7
Sure, I can rephrase that. You could add those antennas, but a metal box will greatly reduce range and performance. Desktop computers aren’t built with internal antennas unless it’s an OEM model with them integrated into the plastic casing. For clarity, this isn’t something people typically do or ask about in PCs—especially after 15 years in this field.
J
jamous1
07-15-2016, 06:52 AM #7

Sure, I can rephrase that. You could add those antennas, but a metal box will greatly reduce range and performance. Desktop computers aren’t built with internal antennas unless it’s an OEM model with them integrated into the plastic casing. For clarity, this isn’t something people typically do or ask about in PCs—especially after 15 years in this field.

S
SSGSS_54
Member
85
07-15-2016, 11:06 AM
#8
The AX210 offers stronger performance with WiFi 6e and generally works better than the AX200. I’d strongly recommend it over the earlier suggestion. Back antennas are problematic from the start unless your router is directly in front of your PC. Using a desk-mounted or magnetic antenna gives more flexibility, ensuring better reception regardless of your PC’s position.
S
SSGSS_54
07-15-2016, 11:06 AM #8

The AX210 offers stronger performance with WiFi 6e and generally works better than the AX200. I’d strongly recommend it over the earlier suggestion. Back antennas are problematic from the start unless your router is directly in front of your PC. Using a desk-mounted or magnetic antenna gives more flexibility, ensuring better reception regardless of your PC’s position.