F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Low performance scores on Cinebench and similar tests despite overclocking. Need assistance.

Low performance scores on Cinebench and similar tests despite overclocking. Need assistance.

Low performance scores on Cinebench and similar tests despite overclocking. Need assistance.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
X
Xikam20
Member
65
09-27-2020, 04:22 AM
#11
post a screenshot of HWInfo64?
X
Xikam20
09-27-2020, 04:22 AM #11

post a screenshot of HWInfo64?

M
MooMoo2011
Senior Member
690
09-27-2020, 05:34 AM
#12
Sure, I can check R23 instead. Please let me know if you'd like the clock speed, PPT, EDC, or TDC values recorded.
M
MooMoo2011
09-27-2020, 05:34 AM #12

Sure, I can check R23 instead. Please let me know if you'd like the clock speed, PPT, EDC, or TDC values recorded.

F
flarbi
Member
199
10-04-2020, 01:20 PM
#13
Not every processor is identical, and recent advancements mean some designs perform better than others.
F
flarbi
10-04-2020, 01:20 PM #13

Not every processor is identical, and recent advancements mean some designs perform better than others.

J
Jerrex
Member
175
10-04-2020, 09:32 PM
#14
PPT, EDC and TDP were configured as "motherboard" (PPT 1000, TDC 160, EDC 190). This setup produced: R23 Multi Core 22433, R23 Single Core 1609. I also tested PPT 165, TDC 115, EDC 150, which gave: R23 Multi Core 22521, R23 Single Core 1590. Any tips on optimizing PPT, EDC and EDC values for better performance and temperatures?
J
Jerrex
10-04-2020, 09:32 PM #14

PPT, EDC and TDP were configured as "motherboard" (PPT 1000, TDC 160, EDC 190). This setup produced: R23 Multi Core 22433, R23 Single Core 1609. I also tested PPT 165, TDC 115, EDC 150, which gave: R23 Multi Core 22521, R23 Single Core 1590. Any tips on optimizing PPT, EDC and EDC values for better performance and temperatures?

T
TwoPunch
Junior Member
14
10-05-2020, 02:32 AM
#15
Your performance is solid, adjusting PL doesn't seem necessary. You might boost a few percentage points, though it could hurt overall stability on single-core tasks—bad for gaming. The best approach would be to apply -30 PBO to all cores except the top four.
T
TwoPunch
10-05-2020, 02:32 AM #15

Your performance is solid, adjusting PL doesn't seem necessary. You might boost a few percentage points, though it could hurt overall stability on single-core tasks—bad for gaming. The best approach would be to apply -30 PBO to all cores except the top four.

J
jokuhr
Junior Member
26
10-06-2020, 08:22 PM
#16
That seems unusual. The 1000 PPT isn't typical. It looks like you're referring to your most recent R23 performance.
J
jokuhr
10-06-2020, 08:22 PM #16

That seems unusual. The 1000 PPT isn't typical. It looks like you're referring to your most recent R23 performance.

K
kaaskotskikker
Posting Freak
795
10-07-2020, 05:01 AM
#17
I’m not entirely sure, but I’m trying to calm your concerns. I can share some evidence if that helps.
K
kaaskotskikker
10-07-2020, 05:01 AM #17

I’m not entirely sure, but I’m trying to calm your concerns. I can share some evidence if that helps.

A
Az_iSnOwZz
Member
132
10-07-2020, 10:18 AM
#18
1000w is the configuration that sets the board to "limitless." The EDC and TDC numbers won’t let the CPU reach it. I’ve never seen a 5900x go over 220w.
A
Az_iSnOwZz
10-07-2020, 10:18 AM #18

1000w is the configuration that sets the board to "limitless." The EDC and TDC numbers won’t let the CPU reach it. I’ve never seen a 5900x go over 220w.

P
P1NG3S
Member
50
10-28-2020, 05:17 AM
#19
Suggesting it's still achievable, though no current cooling solution can reach that level.
P
P1NG3S
10-28-2020, 05:17 AM #19

Suggesting it's still achievable, though no current cooling solution can reach that level.

C
cfmitch
Junior Member
40
10-28-2020, 06:06 AM
#20
To find the optimal configuration, compare your needs against the available options. Look at the two Ryzen results you see—those showing the top performance. Consider whether a lower negative offset (like -20) with fewer but better-performing cores is more valuable than a higher negative offset (like -15) with more cores that are less efficient. The goal is to balance performance and efficiency for your specific use case.
C
cfmitch
10-28-2020, 06:06 AM #20

To find the optimal configuration, compare your needs against the available options. Look at the two Ryzen results you see—those showing the top performance. Consider whether a lower negative offset (like -20) with fewer but better-performing cores is more valuable than a higher negative offset (like -15) with more cores that are less efficient. The goal is to balance performance and efficiency for your specific use case.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next