F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Low latency in high performance RAM

Low latency in high performance RAM

Low latency in high performance RAM

Y
YellowDevs
Member
170
03-03-2018, 10:23 PM
#1
I tested my RAM and found the latency to be high at 59. Anyone have ideas on how to fix this? My system uses Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB with a 3600MHz clock speed.
Y
YellowDevs
03-03-2018, 10:23 PM #1

I tested my RAM and found the latency to be high at 59. Anyone have ideas on how to fix this? My system uses Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB with a 3600MHz clock speed.

C
csige791
Posting Freak
818
03-24-2018, 04:23 PM
#2
You performed a specific diagnostic test. XMP was activated, and your RAM is operating at 3600 MHz instead of the default 2133 MHz.
C
csige791
03-24-2018, 04:23 PM #2

You performed a specific diagnostic test. XMP was activated, and your RAM is operating at 3600 MHz instead of the default 2133 MHz.

T
Tommy4413
Junior Member
3
03-27-2018, 07:50 PM
#3
Yes, my bio is current and I have the latest system specifications.
T
Tommy4413
03-27-2018, 07:50 PM #3

Yes, my bio is current and I have the latest system specifications.

A
Angeli4234
Member
158
04-04-2018, 09:18 PM
#4
What processor are you using? The Aida64 performance figures you're seeing vary a lot depending on the CPU you have—Rocket Lake chips will show much lower latency than Alder Lake or Ryzen models. If you're running XMP profiles on devices like the 12600K or R5 3600, the 59ns value fits what you'd expect. However, with higher-end CPUs such as the 10700K or 7600K, you'd likely see around 30ns or less for this configuration. This difference is due to variations in both CPU architecture and memory system setups between Rocket Lake, DDR4, and newer platforms. Also, many RAM latency tests focus on core-to-core communication rather than the full memory controller path, so results can differ noticeably based on your operating system and background processes. If you're aiming for 10ns or 8.89ns like theoretical values, those won't be achievable under typical usage conditions.
A
Angeli4234
04-04-2018, 09:18 PM #4

What processor are you using? The Aida64 performance figures you're seeing vary a lot depending on the CPU you have—Rocket Lake chips will show much lower latency than Alder Lake or Ryzen models. If you're running XMP profiles on devices like the 12600K or R5 3600, the 59ns value fits what you'd expect. However, with higher-end CPUs such as the 10700K or 7600K, you'd likely see around 30ns or less for this configuration. This difference is due to variations in both CPU architecture and memory system setups between Rocket Lake, DDR4, and newer platforms. Also, many RAM latency tests focus on core-to-core communication rather than the full memory controller path, so results can differ noticeably based on your operating system and background processes. If you're aiming for 10ns or 8.89ns like theoretical values, those won't be achievable under typical usage conditions.

D
Da_Shui_Bi
Member
52
04-11-2018, 12:16 PM
#5
You're running a Ryzen 5600X processor.
D
Da_Shui_Bi
04-11-2018, 12:16 PM #5

You're running a Ryzen 5600X processor.

J
Jonny_T_
Member
122
04-11-2018, 01:44 PM
#6
CPU R5 5600X from ASUS B550M with 3070 MHz
J
Jonny_T_
04-11-2018, 01:44 PM #6

CPU R5 5600X from ASUS B550M with 3070 MHz

P
pauli05
Member
71
04-11-2018, 03:42 PM
#7
In BIOS EZ mode the RAM shows 2666MHz, yet external programs report 3600MHz.
P
pauli05
04-11-2018, 03:42 PM #7

In BIOS EZ mode the RAM shows 2666MHz, yet external programs report 3600MHz.

B
brunolb02
Junior Member
13
04-13-2018, 08:41 AM
#8
The 59ns figure fits well for a chip intended for Aida, especially given the inherent delays from the chiplet architecture. It's slightly above what I'd normally anticipate—just a few nanoseconds extra—which might be due to Aida64's irregular behavior or background Windows updates.
B
brunolb02
04-13-2018, 08:41 AM #8

The 59ns figure fits well for a chip intended for Aida, especially given the inherent delays from the chiplet architecture. It's slightly above what I'd normally anticipate—just a few nanoseconds extra—which might be due to Aida64's irregular behavior or background Windows updates.

J
Jopy
Member
65
04-13-2018, 12:53 PM
#9
alr thks
J
Jopy
04-13-2018, 12:53 PM #9

alr thks