F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Low-end Minecraft shaders running smoothly at 30 frames per second

Low-end Minecraft shaders running smoothly at 30 frames per second

Low-end Minecraft shaders running smoothly at 30 frames per second

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
F
FoolishJ
Junior Member
Find
31
06-13-2023, 12:00 PM
#1
Your FPS stays around 30 because the graphics settings and shader complexity are limiting performance, even though you're using optimized tools. The CPU-heavy shaders might be causing the issue despite your efforts.
Reply
Reply
F
FoolishJ
06-13-2023, 12:00 PM #1

Your FPS stays around 30 because the graphics settings and shader complexity are limiting performance, even though you're using optimized tools. The CPU-heavy shaders might be causing the issue despite your efforts.

Reply
Reply
T
ttreed
Junior Member
Find
15
06-19-2023, 01:31 AM
#2
But the bottleneck is the CPU plus shaders, man—fps is barely there like in Arma 3
Reply
Reply
T
ttreed
06-19-2023, 01:31 AM #2

But the bottleneck is the CPU plus shaders, man—fps is barely there like in Arma 3

Reply
Reply
R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
Find
821
06-19-2023, 02:32 AM
#3
Minecraft shaders can push your CPU to its maximum performance, particularly when using high settings.
Reply
Reply
R
ReborntoKill
06-19-2023, 02:32 AM #3

Minecraft shaders can push your CPU to its maximum performance, particularly when using high settings.

Reply
Reply
I
Ix_Tha_God_xI
Member
Find
96
06-19-2023, 10:47 AM
#4
It is bottleneck but with my setup I don't get over 60 fps most of the time with seus ultra shaders. Mine craft isn't optimized to handle that
Reply
Reply
I
Ix_Tha_God_xI
06-19-2023, 10:47 AM #4

It is bottleneck but with my setup I don't get over 60 fps most of the time with seus ultra shaders. Mine craft isn't optimized to handle that

Reply
Reply
O
Ozwego
Member
Find
191
06-21-2023, 11:29 AM
#5
I also use this. Just Sphax 128x with the SOS shaders.
Reply
Reply
O
Ozwego
06-21-2023, 11:29 AM #5

I also use this. Just Sphax 128x with the SOS shaders.

Reply
Reply
3
3gilad3
Senior Member
Find
735
06-21-2023, 04:09 PM
#6
They require a lot of processing power from your CPU. It seems like your system might be limited. Minecraft can be unpredictable and often gives inconsistent frame rates.
Reply
Reply
3
3gilad3
06-21-2023, 04:09 PM #6

They require a lot of processing power from your CPU. It seems like your system might be limited. Minecraft can be unpredictable and often gives inconsistent frame rates.

Reply
Reply
L
LeCrafteur974
Member
Find
174
07-04-2023, 03:00 PM
#7
shaders really impact every aspect of your setup, and the FX6300 might be the first to show signs of stress. if you commit 10 minutes, I'll check how Ultra and OptiFine perform at 4790K—though OptiFine isn't doing much well anymore.
Reply
Reply
L
LeCrafteur974
07-04-2023, 03:00 PM #7

shaders really impact every aspect of your setup, and the FX6300 might be the first to show signs of stress. if you commit 10 minutes, I'll check how Ultra and OptiFine perform at 4790K—though OptiFine isn't doing much well anymore.

Reply
Reply
B
Bella0810
Member
Find
129
07-04-2023, 04:57 PM
#8
It's due to Minecraft's rendering approach where you see 182 FPS initially, but moving forward reduces the frame rate to 20.
Reply
Reply
B
Bella0810
07-04-2023, 04:57 PM #8

It's due to Minecraft's rendering approach where you see 182 FPS initially, but moving forward reduces the frame rate to 20.

Reply
Reply
W
whatuppants
Junior Member
Find
47
07-22-2023, 11:06 PM
#9
It's mainly due to 1.8, which is the simplest option claiming better performance but actually harms the game's overall optimization.
Reply
Reply
W
whatuppants
07-22-2023, 11:06 PM #9

It's mainly due to 1.8, which is the simplest option claiming better performance but actually harms the game's overall optimization.

Reply
Reply
C
COLIN20052012
Posting Freak
Find
857
07-28-2023, 09:32 AM
#10
Correct
Reply
Reply
C
COLIN20052012
07-28-2023, 09:32 AM #10

Correct

Reply
Reply
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next